From the article:
(The pact mentioned was signed by Bush)
It was, but Obama is not bound by an agreement signed by Bush, as Congress did not sign off on it.
And that does still does not change the fact that Bush ordered us to war with Iraq and Obama ordered the Pentagon to withdraw from Iraq.
That is the way it will be remembered in 2012.
With that said, I would prefer a much quicker withdrawal, but I had a choice between 16 months that one candidate offered versus 50, maybe 100 years that the other candidate offered.
Sorry, wrong again.
"Marines end Iraq mission as Army begins accelerated withdrawal"
It took the Pentagon 4 months to develop plans from Obama's Jan 21 order. !6 months from when withdrawal plans were ready has the last of the combat troops out by Aug. 2010.
Are any of you gentlemen repuclicans?
New Poll Results Are Proof That Republicans Don't Think | | AlterNet
Are any of you gentlemen repuclicans?
New Poll Results Are Proof That Republicans Don't Think | | AlterNet
Are any of you gentlemen repuclicans?
New Poll Results Are Proof That Republicans Don't Think | | AlterNet
Nah ,the Republican party is extinct,all that is left is the wingers. :2wave:
:rofl now that is funny, a poll by the Daily Kos. Shows exactly the kind of sources you read and thus why you lack credibility. I have seen no evidence that liberals think at all, they only feel. When confronted with facts they go into destroy mode, destroy the person and ignore the message.
You have to do better than this.
You would probably prefer a Michael Savage poll.:roll:
Keep projecting and showing that you haven't a clue. I have never listened to Michael Savage but that doesn't stop you from assuming.
I am a conservative that learned to "trust but verify" something apparently foreign to you. You cite the Daily Kos poll and seem to believe that has credibility. All polls depend on the questions asked and the form of those questions. You assume they are accurate because you want them to be accurate. The only true poll that matters are the results from the election polls.
Obama and the radical left appeal to a declining base today as evidenced by the election results from MA., N.J., and Va. Keep spouting the leftwing rhetoric as it appears to be working for you. The support for Obama continues to drop as does the support for the radical leftwing agenda.
You really lean right,. I think. I could say the same thing about the right wing and reagan who cut taxes for the rich and took from the poor. As far as the link I provided it had other links to back up what was reported. It is only a blog. Take it or leave it. Read it, or don't read it, I don't give a darn. Put me on your ignore button if you do not like what I post. Nobody is twisting your arm, you know.
I see, so Reagan who is ranked as one of our top Presidents gave a tax cut to only the rich and took money from the poor? How does allowing people to keep more of THEIR money take money from the poor? How did he take money away from the poor? Do you think your money belongs to someone else?
From your age, you should have been working during the 80's. Were you one of those rich people that got to keep more of what they earned? If so did you do your civic duty and send that tax refund to the poor? Or were you among the poor that Reagan took away from?
This is liberal logic that I will never understand
LiberalAvenger;1058551746]We have a graduated tax system. Reagan took the exreme of graduated taxes and perverted it into trickle down economics.
I was one of those blue collar workers who was triying to catch some of reagans greese drippings.
I don't see an answer to the question, did you or did you not get a tax cut during the Reagan years?
How did Reagan take money from the poor as a result of allowing individuals to keep more of what they earned?
The rest of your post is just more diversion. I wish I could type slower for you so you can understand the questions.
I had no recourse but to accept the tax cut. I would have been a fool not to accept it. I used that money to contribute money to the poor.
LiberalAvenger;1058551817]You are disregarding the payroll tax where the rich stop paying it after a certain amount. Sure, I got a tax cut but I was not for one. I was willing to pay more in taxes for social programs for the needy.
Do you understand where the payroll tax goes? think about it instead of reading leftwing blogs that make you look foolish.
If you are willing to pay more why don't you send the IRS more? Better yet stop expecting the Federal govt. to do more and get your state and local govt. to do more.
I am still waiting for how Reagan took money from the poor? Stopping the payroll tax only affects SS contributions which are supposed to go back to the individual who "contributed" to the fund.
Great, now shouldn't that be the choice of others as well instead of "forced" contribution by the Govt.?
No, Read the 16th Amendment.
It was, but Obama is not bound by an agreement signed by Bush, as Congress did not sign off on it.
And that does still does not change the fact that Bush ordered us to war with Iraq and Obama ordered the Pentagon to withdraw from Iraq.
That is the way it will be remembered in 2012.
With that said, I would prefer a much quicker withdrawal, but I had a choice between 16 months that one candidate offered versus 50, maybe 100 years that the other candidate offered.
Look, it is obvious to me that you will not answer the question because to do so would force you to admit that you were wrong, AGAIN.
Reagan tax cuts went to all individuals. Payroll taxes go to SS and Medicare which come back to the individual therefore Reagan did NOT take anything away from the poor.
You are good at parsing and sophism. See and hear what you want to. No matter what I say you will disagree.
The world is round./
You made the claim that Reagan gave a tax cut to the rich which took money away from the poor. I refuted that and you agreed that you got a tax cut and aren't rich. Tax cuts allow people to keep more of what they earn thus have no impact on the poor.
You then went off on a tangent regarding payroll taxes which obviously you don't understand either.
There was no parsing just ignorance on your part and you cannot admit you were wrong. That is the problem with liberals today, they buy what they are told from leftwing sites and ignore actual facts and even personal experiences all for a political ideology. That is cult like following.
"I know you are but what am I" "Pee Wee's Big Adventure":roll:
Keep trying to divert from the claim you made, I won't allow that to happen. You screwed up and know it. Reagan tax cuts provided more revenue to the govt. and even if it didn't allowing people to keep more of their money doesn't take money away from the poor. Liberals seem to have a problem with accuracy and always make wild claims they cannot back up.
:bunny::beatdeadhorse
During reagan's reign the corporations left america for cheaper labor bordering on slave wages. Because of him we have no industrial base as we did during wwII. When we finally get into a big war what are we going to do? Import tanks from china? Reagan's policies created millions of new jobs but who wants to be a burger flipper>
You are like the enigizer bunny, you just keeep going and going and going....:monkeyarm
Oops, wrong bunny
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?