One hell of a difference between the US President and a local election in one of 50 states of the union....
Well.. did they cut away to breaking news? No. Did they break away to start the criticism of the speech that was not finished? yes. So it must be they did not like what they were hearing and wanted to "spare" their viewers from more.
***** That's WHY he did it. He wanted the photo op.
The GOP took the high road and took Obama up on his offer. I think they scored by having a discussion with Obama. Politically they can say they presented him with alternative policies, and now have a right to block everything he does that is outside their suggestions.
Harshaw, he was complaining this past year about the republican unwillingness to work with democrats on health care. I don't believe he ever said that republicans had no plans. The problem is, while democrats did put some republican ideas into the bills, republicans where not willing to compromise at all. "The Party of no" is a talking point, and it is not entirely accurate, but it is not entirely inaccurate either. While democrats and Obama have to do better, republicans have to actually show a willingness to not reject out of hand.
President Obama walked into the lions’ den Friday and came out with limbs still in place. In fact, to many who watched the spectacle, the lions were left sulking and hungry.
This was the GOP House Issues Conference in Baltimore, to which Obama had been invited as a guest speaker. And to those who watched, it was high political drama – very much like the weekly “Questions to the Prime Minister” sessions in the British House of Commons, an energetic and entertaining debate on policy matters that is unscripted, unrehearsed, and there for all the world to watch on live TV.
As the Monitor’s Dave Cook reported, the interchange was lively, civil, and substantive.
Questions were asked respectfully (for the most part), although some questioners took long minutes of speechifying to get there. As in the House of Commons, the questions were blunt and sometimes pointed. But Obama came right back at them, citing chapter and verse from legislation and nonpartisan government reports, appearing to be at his wonkish best.
“I’m having fun,” he said at one point.
The GOP took the high road and took Obama up on his offer. I think they scored by having a discussion with Obama. Politically they can say they presented him with alternative policies, and now have a right to block everything he does that is outside their suggestions.
I also wonder where all those Republicans who claim that they honestly want health care reform were when they had both Houses and the Presidency.
BUSH: I’m absolutely opposed to a national health care plan. I don’t want the federal government making decisions for consumers or for providers. I remember what the administration tried to do in 1993. They tried to have a national health care plan, and fortunately it failed. I trust people; I don’t trust the federal government. I don’t want the federal government making decisions on behalf of everybody.
BUSH: Step one is to reform the Medicare system. I want to call upon Republicans and Democrats to take care of a senior prescription drug program. I think it’s important to have what’s called Immediate Helping Hand, which is direct money to states so seniors don’t have to chose between food and medicine.
Bush proposed spending an additional $67 billion over the decade to search for cures for age-old afflictions, including Alzheimer’s disease. “As president, I will fund and lead a medical moonshot to reach far beyond what seems possible today.’’ Specifically, Bush would complete a five-year plan already in progress in Congress to double NIH funding by 2003, to about $27 billion.
The Bush plan will:Modernize Medicare.Give seniors a greater choice in plans with more options & access to the latest medical technology.
Provide a prescription drug benefit now.Underwrite at least 25% of the cost of prescription drug premiums for all seniors.
Provide catastrophic Medicare coverage. Ensure seniors suffering from life-threatening illnesses will never pay more than $6,000 annually for Medicare costs.
Provide patients a bill of rights.Provide patient protections, like those in Texas, to ensure quality of care from health care providers.
Provide access to health care for the uninsured and underserved.
Refundable health credit of $2,000 to help purchase health insurance.
Commit $3.6 billion over five years to build 1,200 new Community Health Centers.
Support caregivers and long-term care. Additional exemption ($2,750 in 2000) for each elderly relative; plus 100% tax deduction for long-term care insurance premiums.
Since Democrats oppose everything conservatives support, how would that happen?And what if they block things that are consistent with their own policy positions?
Since Democrats oppose everything conservatives support, how would that happen?
Right where we are today.
Patient control and portability, patients bill of rights, driving down costs allowing interstate competition and tort reform, a health care savings account initiative, realizing medicare and medicaid responsibilities, funding medical research, putting patients first and empowering the individual rather than government, supporting health care happening between patient and doctor rather than government and patient.
You are amazingly unaware as is the thanker of this post of yours, your "wonder" here, is it sincere?
Perhaps I can find something on Google, Groucho, I'm bothered by this "wonder" of yours, I think this is Al Gore and Bush in a 2000 debate, lets return 10 years and see where Republican thought processes are on health care, Obama a spokeperson for Lib plans in 2010, where were Bush and Repubs, I'm saddened so by your 'wonder' and confusion.
Perhaps it is because we had (and still have) a far more pressing issue than government-run healthcare, and that is National Security.No, no, you miss the point, but maybe I wasn't clear enough.
Some conservatives absolutely say no health care reform at all. They are being consistent.
Others say "Hey, we care about health care reform! We want to do something! So listen, instead of the democrat's plan, let's do ours instead!"
My point is toward this second group: If you really truly cared about health care reform, why didn't you do anything about it when you had the power to? Why are you only acting on it now?
I seem to recall Onumbnuts bragging about his win and rubbing it in??well, it's 24 hours later, so, naturally, the white house has a completely new line and spin
all over the sunday talks they're repeating the mantra this morning that THEY'VE BEEN OPEN TO AND HAVE ACTUALLY ADOPTED QUITE A NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN IDEAS
My sentiment exactly!LOL!
david gregory asked axelrod on mtp, do you think republicans want you and the economy to fail?
ask john boehner (gregory's next guest), they've been sitting on the sidelines, we use their ideas
on health care, gregory showed a clip of obama last year proclaiming loud and proud, "health care NOW"
ax: the american people want it, lower premiums, costs, pre existings, rescission, outta pocket, we've incorporated republican ideas
gibbs on cnn, asked by king about their once huge agenda now boiling down to jobs, jobs, jobs
we talked about this in baltimore, we've done small biz tax cuts, infrastructure, gonna use money recovered from tarp to lend to small biz, the engine of jobs creation, in the range of a 100B jobs bill, d's and r's work together, hope r's meet us halfway
gibbs' overall impression of baltimore---the recovery act (the admin's new term for "stimulus") had 300B in tax cuts, the recovery act implemented a lot of republican ideas, r's need to find something they like
evan bayh on fns---i voted against the administration on medicaid funding, on reimbursement of doctors, the freeze is a good start, a wake up call
john mccain and i actually wrote up parts of jim ryan's legislation, we're heading in a better direction
it looks like the white house mantra about "party of no" is turning universally into "we're open to republican ideas, we've always been open to republican ideas"
unbelievable
the drama queens in the white house change their minds like teenage girls
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?