- Joined
- Sep 17, 2013
- Messages
- 48,281
- Reaction score
- 25,273
- Location
- Western NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Yup. That's why I keep pointing out that the people who are "hijacking" religion are the people who DON'T do what their supposed holy books say.
An interesting take, basically calling the vast majority of humanity apostates, but OK.
Religious people are idiots no matter how you spin it. I'm just pointing out the absurdity of Obama's position, and yours.
Please. It's not a "victim" thing at all. What else would YOU call someone who does nothing but baselessly smear "the left" 24-7? I thought conservatives actually fought for conservative principles, rather than sitting around whining about liberals.
Apparently, since you keep defending Obama, your position is similar.
You didn't answer either of my questions.
Obama's position regarding the association of radicals to mainstream Islam dates back to the Bush administration. It's called managing the messaging.
That's because they are not Muslims, they are barbarians.
First the 'problem' isn't a religion but a few terrorists who pervert a religion in an attempt to gain cover for their incredible vicious power grab.
Second, that a few CONs are hellbent on calling these terrorists Muslim doesn't change the equation.
Third, calling the Japanese slurs during WWII didn't 'help' in the final victory... amazing science did...
Fourth, the President did 'dare utter the problem'- that he didn't phrase it the way a few way out CONs wished is on you....eace
But they are following the Koran and the teachings of Mohammed. That's the point. Whether you and Obama agree with them or not, or their interpretations, is beside the point.That's not what Obama is trying to say. From what I'm understanding, Obama is saying ISIS does not represent Islam because they're not actually following the teaching of that faith. They are twisting it to empower themselves, much like the KKK did in America.
Did anyone not know who he was referring to, for the most part.
I say most part as presently terror is present in India, Myanmar where Buddhists are killing Muslims.
Or did it not fit a particular agenda.
Myanmar Buddhists Threaten to Kill Muslims
Hindu-Muslim Clashes In Muzaffarpur District In India's Bihar State Kill 3, Police Arrest 14 People
Muslims burned to death in India attack - Al Jazeera English
Hindus attack Muslims in India, 15 killed | Asia-Pasific | Worldbulletin News
Did anyone not know who he was referring to, for the most part.
I say most part as presently terror is present in India, Myanmar where Buddhists are killing Muslims.
Or did it not fit a particular agenda.
Myanmar Buddhists Threaten to Kill Muslims
Hindu-Muslim Clashes In Muzaffarpur District In India's Bihar State Kill 3, Police Arrest 14 People
Muslims burned to death in India attack - Al Jazeera English
Hindus attack Muslims in India, 15 killed | Asia-Pasific | Worldbulletin News
Nah, most of these people consider international news propaganda. FOX is real news.
Were the IRA classed as Roman Catholic terrorists?
And in India, Hindus are killing Buddhists. Same s**t, different religion.
Not sure why my post prompted that question.
The post did not - the OP did- Obama not using the term Muslim.
No offence was intended.
It's all good, I wasn't offended, just didn't understand it. You posted several good links from international news agencies on Muslims being oppressed, and I was just pointing out that many here won't accept a news story from non American news media.
Im saying we have a leader who wont dare utter the problem. His PC spin prevents this.
President Lincoln didn't recognize the Southern rebel uprising as a "war" either. If he had it would have legitimized the Southern seccession. It's the same with Obama refusing to give the jihadists any recognition for their uprising as well. In fact, we shouldn't even be calling them a state.
First the 'problem' isn't a religion but a few terrorists who pervert a religion in an attempt to gain cover for their incredible vicious power grab.
Second, that a few CONs are hellbent on calling these terrorists Muslim doesn't change the equation.
Third, calling the Japanese slurs during WWII didn't 'help' in the final victory... amazing science did...
Fourth, the President did 'dare utter the problem'- that he didn't phrase it the way a few way out CONs wished is on you....eace
Just because you want to give ISIS what it wants, worldwide recognition that it is Islam's true representative and is fighting a muslim holy war against the west, does not mean Obama will go along with it. You can praise ISIS to the rooftops for their "religious purity" if you want but sane people will recognize them for the thugs and criminals they are.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?