- Joined
- Jul 13, 2012
- Messages
- 47,695
- Reaction score
- 10,467
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Straw, I said "control", the fed does not control the stock markets, there is not a 1 to 1 relation to interest rates/money supply and the indices. There have been crashes without fed moves, again, not 1 to 1.
Weird, now you are back to using "control". No, the POTUS can influence the FED decisions, he can put his man or woman in charge, he can ask that they use their influence to effect credit/banking stabilization, interest and money supply.
Sorry, I missed the part where you showed it to be false.
Actually, they are up since the bottoming of the Bush Recession.
Good grief, here you are, Mr. Oil, asking me to educate you on the history of US oil corporations.
Hint: Look it up for yourself.
This is the typical denier response still not coming to term with the depths of the Bush Recession.
Now I see why you don't know about the early history of oil industry subsidization (and probably not the current amounts either), it is because you don't read what is in front of you. Here, let me repeat and see if you get it the second time:
Detroit saw massive declines in 2000 in manufacturing and along with it massive declines in population with some of the highest levels of unemployment. Manufacturing in the US has tumbled in the same time period, unions existed long before 2000. Find a better meme.
PS....I see you have abandoned the whole "Has anyone heard of, seen, read anything about the Earthquakes, the ground water pollution and the horrors of Fracking that Obamabots are are complaining about" meme.
Was not that the a main argument point along with the denial that oil deposits are not an act of "god"?
Everything you are saying is word games and proof that you don't seem to understand words.
I was only responding to what your delusional rants have touched on. Have you heard of any of the things highlighted in red cropping up in NoDak?