- Joined
- Oct 18, 2011
- Messages
- 6,715
- Reaction score
- 1,911
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
I love it! :lol: http://news.yahoo.com/-obama-does-not-favor-changing-pot-laws%E2%80%A6%E2%80%9Dat-this-point%E2%80%9D-184905783.html;_ylt=A2KJjalaOhVS8GYA5CDQtDMD
So on the one hand:
But, on the other:
And:
Then again:
Obviously, someone doesn't understand "supply and demand".
So The Pres says he doesn't want to make an effort going after the demanding abusers, but:
Okay .. so it's obvious Obama is attempting to placate a many vote-panderable segments of the issue as possible. We get that. So what he truly wants from a national-best-interest perspective is simply unknown.
Too bad, as we would like to think The Pres would be clear about what he thinks is in the nation's best interest in the matter.
Still, abusers of
And the DEA should know, obviously, as they are the experts in the matter, and not likely to lie about the damaging deadly effects of these drugs like, oh, the drug abusers would.
Yet Obama wants to be lax with these criminals and illegals and the like, as, you know, they tend to vote for his liberal Democrats.
For the drug abuser, however, though Obama won't be riding the neighborhood range and rustling up stray addicts, he will be cracking down on their feed source, meaning the so-called "drug war" is still in full-force under our executive-order-happy despot.
So addicts would do well not to push, or they could easily get caught in the crossfire and sent to the pokey.
Yippee ki-yay, druggies!
So on the one hand:
President Barack Obama doesn’t think cracking down on individual pot smokers is a good use of federal dollars, but he also doesn’t think it’s time to loosen the country’s marijuana laws
But, on the other:
at least ”at this point.”
And:
“The priority in terms of the dedication of law-enforcement resources should be targeted towards drug kingpins, drug traffickers and others who perpetrate violence in the conduct of the drug trade,”
Then again:
and not individual users
Obviously, someone doesn't understand "supply and demand".
So The Pres says he doesn't want to make an effort going after the demanding abusers, but:
“the president does not, at this point, advocate a change in the law.”
Okay .. so it's obvious Obama is attempting to placate a many vote-panderable segments of the issue as possible. We get that. So what he truly wants from a national-best-interest perspective is simply unknown.
Too bad, as we would like to think The Pres would be clear about what he thinks is in the nation's best interest in the matter.
Still, abusers of
are still abusing a schedule I class drug, a federal offense, because“Aunt Mary, BC Bud, Blunts, Boom, Chronic, Dope, Gangster, Ganja, Grass, Hash, Herb, Hydro, Indo, Joint, Kif, Mary Jane, Mota, Pot, Reefer, Sinsemila, Skunk, Smoke, Weed, and Yerba”
Those are “drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Schedule I drugs are the most dangerous drugs of all the drug schedules with potentially severe psychological or physical dependence,” the DEA says.
And the DEA should know, obviously, as they are the experts in the matter, and not likely to lie about the damaging deadly effects of these drugs like, oh, the drug abusers would.
Yet Obama wants to be lax with these criminals and illegals and the like, as, you know, they tend to vote for his liberal Democrats.
For the drug abuser, however, though Obama won't be riding the neighborhood range and rustling up stray addicts, he will be cracking down on their feed source, meaning the so-called "drug war" is still in full-force under our executive-order-happy despot.
So addicts would do well not to push, or they could easily get caught in the crossfire and sent to the pokey.
Yippee ki-yay, druggies!
Last edited: