Obama said:It's those hardliners chanting "Death to America" who have been most opposed to the deal. They're making common cause with the Republican Caucus.
I really like the part where he equated Republicans with terrorists that shout "Death to America". Super classy.
President Barack Obama acknowledged Wednesday that Iran might use cash coming its way under sanctions relief to fund "terrorist organizations" but argued this is preferable to allowing it to develop nuclear arms.
"The truth is, that Iran has always found a way to fund these efforts," Obama said, in a speech to defend the Iran nuclear deal.
"And whatever benefit Iran may claim from sanctions relief pales in comparison to the danger it could pose with a nuclear weapon."
I don't care what was in his speech...I don't listen to political speeches anymore from the major parties (now that Ron Paul has retired)...complete waste of time.
But no matter what his motives were, bravo to Obama for getting (sort of) something right.
This deal will actually help the Middle East AND America AND Israel (in the long run).
It is high time that Iran became part of the world again...or at least, started to become part of the world again.
Obama did squat for the economy..but he did good on Cuba and Iran, IMO.
He such a friken liar..
He said during the negotiations that the Grand Supreme Leader issued a " Fatwa " on Nuclear weapons.
Today he said if Congress doesn't ok this deal Iran will have Nuke in 6 months.
He's such a hack, desperate to carve out some semblance of a legacy that doesn't include economic incompetence and Foreign Policy disasters.
1. if you think people will be thanking Obama for the Iran deal in 10 years you are in Colorado smoking something
2. I love people who think they know more about Iran than Israel does. They LIVE THERE. you are on the other side of the planet. but YOU know better; and YOU know this deal will be good for them even if they don't. what pomposity.
Yeah, who does that Obama think he is? Everyone knows that inconsistent threats of Iran getting the bomb are the domain of conservatives, christian fundies and Bibi. He should let them have their silly little argument.
Yeah tell that to the 50,000 US and Allied troops that have been posted to South Korea for the last 60 years... Why are they there anyway? Silly little troops
Jesus the ignorance on the left is astounding!
Tim-
On October 9, 2006, North Korea announced it had successfully conducted its first nuclear test. An underground explosion was detected, its yield was estimated as less than a kiloton, and some radioactive output was detected.[6][7][8]
On January 6, 2007, the North Korean government further confirmed that it had nuclear weapons.[9]
In April 2009, reports surfaced that North Korea has become a "fully fledged nuclear power", an opinion shared by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Mohamed ElBaradei.[10] On May 25, 2009, North Korea conducted a second nuclear test, resulting in an explosion estimated to be between 2 and 7 kilotons.[11] The 2009 test, like the 2006 test, is believed to have occurred at Mantapsan, Kilju County, in the north-eastern part of North Korea.[12]
On February 11, 2013, the U.S. Geological Survey detected a magnitude 5.1 seismic disturbance,[13] reported to be a third underground nuclear test.[14] North Korea has officially reported it as a successful nuclear test with a lighter warhead that delivers more force than before, but has not revealed the exact yield. Multiple South Korean sources estimate the yield at 6–9 kilotons, while the German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources estimates the yield at 40 kilotons.[15][16][17]
*bolded relevant text1. if you think people will be thanking Obama for the Iran deal in 10 years you are in Colorado smoking something
2. I love people who think they know more about Iran than Israel does. They LIVE THERE. you are on the other side of the planet. but YOU know better; and YOU know this deal will be good for them even if they don't. what pomposity.
You do know North Korea has had nuclear weapons for... 6 years right? And posting 50K troops at the DMZ has done absolutely nothing to stop that from happening. Right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korea_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction
I said nothing about why we had troops there, but the main point is that they are a rogue, unpredictable nation.. Hence the need for military power!~ The one glaring point you fail to observe though is that China did have nukes, and they are good buds with N. Korea.. And we had weak kneed leaders not willing to engage them when we should have, and like we should do now with Iran!
Or, we could continue to leverage our economic power to keep sanctions on Iran via our allies and of course China and Russia. No one was going to pull out of sanctions if we threatened them with economic sanctions of their own. Unlike most nations in Europe, we are self-sustaining economy (Or could be) if we wanted too.
Tim-
*bolded relevant text
Yes, but these are sovereign nations (The U.S. & Israel)), each having their own interests - Israel's interests are not necessarily ours.
We will deal with Iran in our own way, just as they do. If there's any commonalty, it's by accident - not design.
It's not even about how WE see Israel. It's how their enemies see them: as a U.S. representative in their own land. They symbolize the Great Satan. Don't you see that? THAT is more than enough "commonality" for me to beg for their protection.
and name me a U.S. President more suspicious and standoff-ish towards Israel than Obama has been. All of this works in Iran's favor, which means it's BAD for us.
I said nothing about why we had troops there, but the main point is that they are a rogue, unpredictable nation.
. Hence the need for military power!~ The one glaring point you fail to observe though is that China did have nukes, and they are good buds with N. Korea.. And we had weak kneed leaders not willing to engage them when we should have, and like we should do now with Iran!
Or, we could continue to leverage our economic power to keep sanctions on Iran via our allies and of course China and Russia. No one was going to pull out of sanctions if we threatened them with economic sanctions of their own. Unlike most nations in Europe, we are self-sustaining economy (Or could be) if we wanted too.
Tim-
Are you really suggesting that the United States threaten other countries with sanctions in order to keep the pressure on iran?
can't think of one, It's refreshing and about time.
Rogue seems a tad hyperbolic seeing as they seem to be interested in doing business with many nations outside of the US.
Mmkay, and? I doubt China is looking to start a nuclear war. It's bad for business.
Sorry, I'm not down with silly bully tactics like the ones you're proposing. :shrug:
The way I see it, we're stuck with Israel.It's not even about how WE see Israel. It's how their enemies see them: as a U.S. representative in their own land. They symbolize the Great Satan. Don't you see that? THAT is more than enough "commonality" for me to beg for their protection.
and name me a U.S. President more suspicious and standoff-ish towards Israel than Obama has been. All of this works in Iran's favor, which means it's BAD for us.
They way I see it, we're stuck with Israel.
They may be strategically important to our interests in the region, but sometimes I don't know if they're worth the troubles they cause:
- From the very get-go of their nation they did a land-grab, setting the tone & alienation towards them even further back - something that festers until today.
- They refuse to join the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty, thumbing their noses at us.
- They refuse to implement (or even acknowledge) a two-state solution, again thumbing their nose at us (and the entire region).
So like I said, "They have their interests, and we have ours". I just wish our interests weren't so intertwined with theirs.
People like you and Obama, and progressive liberals really think if the US just pulls away from being the world super power that everything will all fall into place. That IS moronic.. I can't even begin to explain it to you, you're too far gone bruh..
Tim-
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?