what makes you think NYPD have the right to make an arrest outside of New York?
guess what....they don't.
when they leave New York State, they are regular citizens.....and have no right to carry their guns or make arrests.
And Mayor Michael Bloomberg said his police department's monitoring of Muslims - even outside the city at colleges in Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and upstate New York - was "legal," "appropriate" and "constitutional."
Effing prick. There really is nothing more I can add.
I never said they could make an arrest... However, they could legally detain anyone in an act of committing a crime, ANYWHERE it was taking place, just like you and I could in most circumstances.
Tim-
sure, if we see someone being mugged, killed, raped, or a house or car being robbed.
So, like I said, as much as you may not like it, Bloomberg was correct in his statement to the media. Now, go out and try and have ole Bloomy removed from office and see how far that get's ya....
yes, there is a crime of "terrorism", in the NYS penal code.
dude, terrorists have been striking this city since the early 20th century.
Wall Street bombing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thanks, Thunder, Va does not have an anti terrorist law as far as I know or can find.
It does bring up an interesting point: If Arizona cannot make their own laws to stop illegal border invaders from coming into the state on the grounds that it is a federal function, why, then, does NYC have the right to have their own anti terrorist laws? Even in their own state, let alone elsewhere.
The government has always infiltrated groups seen as potentially dangerous. I remember on person joking he suspected that there were more government agents in the KKK than KKK members.
Besides, it's Columbia U. I don't put any stock coming out of that source.
what makes you think NYPD have the right to make an arrest outside of New York?
guess what....they don't.
when they leave New York State, they are regular citizens.....and have no right to carry their guns….
sure, if we see someone being mugged, killed, raped, or a house or car being robbed.
or a terrorist plot being hatched
due to illegal surveillance?
the charges would be tossed out of court.
why?
............
what constitutes illegal surveillance? that they obtained all or a portion of it outside the boundary of NYC. foolish conceptwhy would charges based on evidence collected during illegal surveillance, get tossed out of court??
:lamo
what constitutes illegal surveillance? that they obtained all or a portion of it outside the boundary of NYC. foolish concept
try again
are you just asking silly questions?
its kinda looking that way.
keep trying to ask a question you might be able to answer. appears i was wrong
i'll try again; this time don't avoid the question by asking one of your own. explain why information obtained outside the boundaries of NYC would cause such evidence to be dismissed in court
sorry bud, but some things are self-explanatory.
so, you would want the information to be fund unacceptable but you have no basis to expect that result
got it
ok man.
since you folded on that point, let me make another one
glad you arrived to take his placeFolded? Yeah right, he folded to your inability to answer a question.
glad you arrived to take his place
you tell us why evidence collected by the surveillance group would be excluded by the courts because it was collected outside the boundary of NYC
this should be rich
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?