NY Times 11/21/22 - Hitler's anti-Semitism is "not so genuine"

[j brown's body]

Sound familiar?

 

[bomberfox]

That turned out to be a big oofh. I tend to not care about waxing the crystal ball about how people really feel.

 

[bomberfox]

With that said, there is the possibility that Hitler could have actually believed all of it yet still know what antisemitism does. The reason nazis tie the jews to civil rights, gay rights, and women’s liberation is because they hate the advancement of human rights as an affront to the place in the hierarchy they believe they are owed for some nebulous reason. The tie in with jews is not only a belief but also a tool.

 

[TheParser]

I have read that the New York Times (until the United States was forced into the war) consciously tempered its criticism of Herr Hitler's antisemitism.

The reason, it is said, was that the Jewish owners of that newspaper did not want its readers to think that the Times was biased in its reporting on Germany.

 

[Integrityrespec]

View attachment 67402772

Sound familiar?

Yeah, several politicians praised Hitler, many denied the holocaust was happening, some still deny it ever happened. Chamberlain declared "peace in our time" after giving in to Hitlers demands in 1938. Appeasement doesn't make good policy.

 

[Ouroboros]

View attachment 67402772

Sound familiar?

Nope. What’s your comparison?

 

[j brown's body]

I have read that the New York Times (until the United States was forced into the war) consciously tempered its criticism of Herr Hitler's antisemitism.

The reason, it is said, was that the Jewish owners of that newspaper did not want its readers to think that the Times was biased in its reporting on Germany.

Very much the same thing about their reporting on Trump and the Republicans and their interest in patriarchal white supremacy.

 

[Eriech]

I have read that the New York Times (until the United States was forced into the war) consciously tempered its criticism of Herr Hitler's antisemitism.

The reason, it is said, was that the Jewish owners of that newspaper did not want its readers to think that the Times was biased in its reporting on Germany.

And the NYTimes has been lying ever since.

 

[TheParser]

And the NYTimes has been lying ever since.

Oh, yeah!

The straw that broke the camel's back occurred when a young lady dancer accused a fraternity of abusing her.

The Times immediately believed her because of her ethnicity.

And it immediately considered the fraternity boys guilty because of their ethnicity.

The woke D.A. also believed the accuser.

He was so biased that he was eventually sentenced to a symbolic one day in jail.

Disgusting and sickening!

(Until The Donald won, that rag was going bankrupt. Then he appeared, and it became the voice of The Resistance -- gaining a huge number of digital subscribers.)

 

[NolanVoyd]

Oh, yeah!

The straw that broke the camel's back occurred when a young lady dancer accused a fraternity of abusing her.

The Times immediately believed her because of her ethnicity.

And it immediately considered the fraternity boys guilty because of their ethnicity.

The woke D.A. also believed the accuser.

He was so biased that he was eventually sentenced to a symbolic one day in jail.

Disgusting and sickening!

(Until The Donald won, that rag was going bankrupt. Then he appeared, and it became the voice of The Resistance -- gaining a huge number of digital subscribers.)

Why do actual nazis always show up at conservarive/republican causes and on the same side as conservatives.?

Why was the rally in Charlottesville, organized by actual nazis, called the "unite the RIGHT" rally, not the Unite the left rally?

Please answer.

I'll wait.

 

[Jredbaron96]

While this is obviously a harsher in hindsight issue, given this was more than a decade before Hitler took power a misjudgement isn't that surprising.

 

[Eriech]

Oh, yeah!

The straw that broke the camel's back occurred when a young lady dancer accused a fraternity of abusing her.

The Times immediately believed her because of her ethnicity.

And it immediately considered the fraternity boys guilty because of their ethnicity.

The woke D.A. also believed the accuser.

He was so biased that he was eventually sentenced to a symbolic one day in jail.

Disgusting and sickening!

(Until The Donald won, that rag was going bankrupt. Then he appeared, and it became the voice of The Resistance -- gaining a huge number of digital subscribers.)

Saw this classic lie today:

 

[Oozlefinch]

View attachment 67402772

Sound familiar?

An article, in 1922.

Too bad that was all proven to be completely wrong after Kristallnacht six years later.

 

[joluoto]

View attachment 67402772

Sound familiar?

Yes, very. Antisemitism as alive and well I'm afraid. They just code the word now, try to pretend they don't say Jew. Sometimes they slip though, like in Charlotteville. And people still say they don't mean what they say. They mean every word of it.