- Joined
- Dec 15, 2012
- Messages
- 19,139
- Reaction score
- 11,731
- Location
- New York
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Mods: I posted this under Gun Control since the court's decision is based on a 2nd Amendment argument. If this isn't the best place for this please feel free to move it.
A US Federal district judge ruled yesterday that New York State's long term ban on possession of nunchaku violates the 2nd amendment. NY outlawed nunchaku back in the 70s out of fear that, with the growing popularity of martial arts films, that kids and gangs would start using them to commit violent crimes. NY used a similar rational to outlaw switchblade knives in the 50s. Both were cases of real life politicians enacting legislation based on movies and in neither case did the presumed wave of violent crimes ever become reality.
Two points.
1. As you might imagine from my comments above I think the nunchaku ban was idiocy. It was and I'm glad to see it go and would be happy to see the switchblade law overturned as well. Perhaps as well the state will finally take up an overhaul of it's knife laws that in practice leave in the hands of the police whether or not common work tools like leathermen are illegal. NYC is notorious for arresting tradesmen for possessing leathermen and other multitools because the locking blade, if loosened enough, can be made to act like a "gravity knife" which is also illegal to possess in NY - for the same spurious reasons that make switchblades illegal.
2. The case began in 2003, went to supreme court and initially was lost. However in 2010 the SC remanded the case to the lower court in light of the recent incorporation of the 2A against the states. It took 8 years to reach a decision? Really. There is something seriously wrong here if it took 8 years to rehear the case.
Link to the AP article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/federal-court-says-ny-ban-on-nunchucks-unconstitutional/2018/12/17/2bc16590-0258-11e9-958c-0a601226ff6b_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.be298696448c
A US Federal district judge ruled yesterday that New York State's long term ban on possession of nunchaku violates the 2nd amendment. NY outlawed nunchaku back in the 70s out of fear that, with the growing popularity of martial arts films, that kids and gangs would start using them to commit violent crimes. NY used a similar rational to outlaw switchblade knives in the 50s. Both were cases of real life politicians enacting legislation based on movies and in neither case did the presumed wave of violent crimes ever become reality.
Two points.
1. As you might imagine from my comments above I think the nunchaku ban was idiocy. It was and I'm glad to see it go and would be happy to see the switchblade law overturned as well. Perhaps as well the state will finally take up an overhaul of it's knife laws that in practice leave in the hands of the police whether or not common work tools like leathermen are illegal. NYC is notorious for arresting tradesmen for possessing leathermen and other multitools because the locking blade, if loosened enough, can be made to act like a "gravity knife" which is also illegal to possess in NY - for the same spurious reasons that make switchblades illegal.
2. The case began in 2003, went to supreme court and initially was lost. However in 2010 the SC remanded the case to the lower court in light of the recent incorporation of the 2A against the states. It took 8 years to reach a decision? Really. There is something seriously wrong here if it took 8 years to rehear the case.
Link to the AP article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/federal-court-says-ny-ban-on-nunchucks-unconstitutional/2018/12/17/2bc16590-0258-11e9-958c-0a601226ff6b_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.be298696448c