teacher said:
Before we get started, you seem ok. Nonetheless, I'm contractually obligated to pick on everyone.
That's like claiming you can embarrass a Christian Fundlementalist when they qute scripure to back up their bullshit. They just claim God told them so.
So you see no difference between my humor and calling them sand ******s? You're going on my "Those without a sence-o-humor" list. Poor thing.
Whatever.
On a political website? Tells me you don't know much about politics.
That will win a lot of debates.
Guess you haven't noticed the replies/views in my own personal "troll" thread.
About me?
My bad.
Oooooh. Just got a call to arms. I'll get to rest of your post another time.
I want the “Christian” Fundlementalist [sic] to “post their weak azz rhetoric,” because if there is a Christian out there they need the embarrassment if they don‘t show up to correct their brothers and sisters. The reality is that groups define themselves. When the Arab can not condemn Hamas I know what they are, and I can judge that individual on the content of their character, and if we vote for politicians that “make edicts for usury, to support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act established against the rich, and provide more piercing statutes daily to chain up and restrain the poor,” the Arab can judge our electorate on the content of its character: as we judge the Arab electorate, they can judge us.
Don’t you think the Nazi rooted Baathist Arab looks at your humor as an excuse?
Teacher I am not a politician, so you are right, I do not understand politics.
We need to do more than win a debate in our own mind. We have to win the people.
*****
“You have probably caught that Visa credit card commercial in which a wily wife hides her many shopping sprees under the bed and up in the attic, all out of sight from her clueless husband.
The punch line is that she could have won all that stuff she rung up on the plastic. But the reality behind such behavior is hardly a laughing matter.”
http://www.mysanantonio.com/business/consumernews/stories/MYSA010705.1P.compulsive.7e477ff1.html
We the people seem to think two separate branches of government (married to each other) having the power to increase the national debt at their whim, without the knowledge and consent of the government as a whole, is a definition of “household management.” Do you understand? Aristotle is turning in his grave.
“Democratic Platform STRONG, HEALTHY FAMILIES”
http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=119128&postcount=1
Do they really care to debate?
“Care for us! True, indeed! They ne'er car'd for us yet. Suffer us to famish, and their storehouses cramm'd with grain; make edicts for usury, to support usurers; repeal daily
any wholesome act established against the rich, and provide more piercing statutes daily to chain up and restrain the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and there's all the love they bear us.”
http://shakespeare.thefreelibrary.com/Tragedy-of-Coriolanus/1-1
Nothing has changed.
“[2.280] And if (the debtor) is in straitness, then let there be postponement until (he is in) ease; and that you remit (it) as alms is better for you, if you knew.”
“(ii) You are the nation that permits Usury, which has been forbidden by all the religions. Yet you build your economy and investments on Usury. As a result of this, in all its different forms and guises, the Jews have taken control of your economy, through which they have then taken control of your media, and now control all aspects of your life making you their servants and achieving their aims at your expense; precisely what Benjamin Franklin warned you against.”
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/worldview/story/0,11581,845725,00.html
If the Arab wins that debate, will we be better off?