No, actually your exposition was pretty lousy. What you said was "there are no Christian fundamental Christian groups", which one interprets as meaning you said "there are no Christian fundamental Christian groups". If you wanted it to reflect the particular context that you meant to include, then you should word it better instead of later washing your posts down with polysllabics explaining it. Infact, I could dissect most of your previous postings and show a heap of such paltry constructions. Second of all, you're one of the most usless people I've ever seen argue a point. You're far less of one that is armed with a wealth of knowledge than you are a cheap little mud-slinger armed with a thesaurus and your above friend clapping in glee when you read from it.
As for your so-called warnings. I don't know where and to whom your attention goes and I care even less.
This debate has quickly degenerated into the idea of throwing **** around because it's an apparent particular favourite of yours knowing you've got more chance of making that stick than your whole argument itself. And, constantly, it's been the same thing from you: "oh, you're obtuse! oh, you appeaser!, oh, it's all so obtuse!" here and elsewhere and so on and so on reapeating your entire boring eposide, again. The only unfortunate position I left myself was bothering to debate with you in the first place. As a consequence from here on, I think you ought to be left alone, for elementary sakes of bypassing complete boredom.