- Joined
- Nov 11, 2011
- Messages
- 14,208
- Reaction score
- 5,144
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Actually a good idea. I'm for that.There was big news last night, and at least three threads were created about it. I posted in a couple of them, starting the first on the topic. I went back to look for one of the others this morning, only to find it wasn't there, and my thread on the topic was much, much longer than it had been.
Suggestion: when duplicate threads are merged, a tag should be placed in the thread title, along the lines of the warning notifications. [Merged] would be my suggestion.
Just so everyone knows what's going on.
As long as the title is titled right, that works. "He Lied!" wouldn't match up (just an example)Taking a few minutes to check if a thread already exists should take care of them having to merge.
That’s too much work. People are generally smart enough to figure it out.Addendum: perhaps include the number of threads that were merged as well. Last night's example: [Merged: 3] or [3 Merged]
The number can be updated, I presume, as new merges are completed.
I agree. But it still happens, as evidenced by the (at least) two threads created after mine.Taking a few minutes to check if a thread already exists should take care of them having to merge.
"Too much work?"That’s too much work. People are generally smart enough to figure it out.
It’s more work than just merging multiple threads, which is already a job and a half when news breaks. We don’t need to pile on the busy work by requiring personal notifications so you aren’t confused."Too much work?"
Multiple threads are most likely breaking news.This should applyAs long as the title is titled right, that works. "He Lied!" wouldn't match up (just an example)
Exact same title as the cited article
There was big news last night, and at least three threads were created about it. I posted in a couple of them, starting the first on the topic. I went back to look for one of the others this morning, only to find it wasn't there, and my thread on the topic was much, much longer than it had been.
Suggestion: when duplicate threads are merged, a tag should be placed in the thread title, along the lines of the warning notifications. [Merged] would be my suggestion.
Just so everyone knows what's going on.debatevpokitucsbis too busy keeping
ok, consider me properly schooled.Multiple threads are most likely breaking news.This should apply
No, I just checked. It looks like most are avoiding breaking news and start the threads in other forums.ok, consider me properly schooled.
The presumably trivial burden of things that are dismissed as "too much work" continues to astound.It’s more work than just merging multiple threads, which is already a job and a half when news breaks. We don’t need to pile on the busy work by requiring personal notifications so you aren’t confused.
That's too hard for some people apparently.Taking a few minutes to check if a thread already exists should take care of them having to merge.
We interrupt Hunter's crack session to bring you the following.
.Obviously there was far more to nail the Biden's asses to the wall.
. Does this cover his coke baggy in the White House? They have desperately tried to get the evidence destroyed. It does. It said "any crimes".
. Will he pardon the entire crime family next?
I hate to bring it up because of how ruffled some feathers like to get over cross-platform comparisons, but I'm pretty sure this was (or could be made) automatic on other software like vBulletin. I know I recall seeing bolded, differently-colored forum-applied notices similar to the one I suggested on other forums. Perhaps they use other forum software?A site where I used to post did this fairly easily.It really cleaned up the clutter. Posters didn't have to jump from one thread to another to engage in the same conversation. I don't know why they don't do it here.
Like comprehending that sometimes threads get merged.The presumably trivial burden of things that are dismissed as "too much work" continues to astound.
I don't think anyone has indicated they struggle with either the concept or the rationale.Like comprehending that sometimes threads get merged.
I just can't comprehend how much you require your hand held. It's rather odd. The warnings in a thread title serve a purpose. Warn people of the existence of a warning so they can behave on entering. Putting merged in thread titles serves no purpose that I can conceive of. It's a forum, duplicate threads get merged, and it isn't necessary to highlight every time it happens.I don't think anyone has indicated they struggle with either the concept or the rationale.
All that's being suggested here is a one- or two-word notice when it happens. But, evidently, this is a task at which Hercules himself would give the side-eye.
You can see your own posts in those threads, even when they get merged into other threads.There was big news last night, and at least three threads were created about it. I posted in a couple of them, starting the first on the topic. I went back to look for one of the others this morning, only to find it wasn't there, and my thread on the topic was much, much longer than it had been.
Suggestion: when duplicate threads are merged, a tag should be placed in the thread title, along the lines of the warning notifications. [Merged] would be my suggestion.
Just so everyone knows what's going on.
How about you chill the **** out? It's a simple suggestion that some kind of notification be made when threads are merged so people know what happened to a thread they may have been watching.I just can't comprehend how much you require your hand held.
As would thread merge notifications.The warnings in a thread title serve a purpose.
Notify people multiple threads were merged so they know where one went after it vanishes.Warn people of the existence of a warning so they can behave on entering.
It would "notify people multiple threads were merged so they know where one went after it vanishes."Putting merged in thread titles serves no purpose that I can conceive of.
It's a forum. Warnings in threads are issued, and it isn't necessary to highlight every time it happens.It's a forum, duplicate threads get merged, and it isn't necessary to highlight every time it happens.
I can only see my posts in the merged thread if I posted in one of the pre-merger threads.You can see your own posts in those threads, even when they get merged into other threads.
I can only see my posts in the merged thread if I posted in one of the pre-merger threads.
I think all threads solely with the purpose of bashing Trump should be merged...or given their own forum.
How about you chill the **** out? It's a simple suggestion that some kind of notification be made when threads are merged so people know what happened to a thread they may have been watching.
As would thread merge notifications.
Notify people multiple threads were merged so they know where one went after it vanishes.
It would "notify people multiple threads were merged so they know where one went after it vanishes."
It's a forum. Warnings in threads are issued, and it isn't necessary to highlight every time it happens.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?