• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"Not What We Are Seeing" - US Intel Officials Reject Biden's "Genocide" Claims

Antiwar said:
USG militarism is the antithesis of liberalism. You're neoliberal, at best; probably closer to neoconservative.
Click to expand...
Nope. Most liberals support the military, and support using the military. Just ot in every case.

Iraq, for example, didn't make much sense.

But regardless, the US is not worse then Russia when it comes to war crimes. Not even close. Not even in the same ballpark. The facts don't support it. It is a ridiculous falsehood.
 
VySky said:
More Biden lies.

False flag Joey.

———

The comments sparked reactions from around the diplomatic world.

French President Emmanuel Macron was the most outspoken, refusing to back Biden’s claim that Russia is committing “genocide” in Ukraine. The French leader instead warned that an escalation of rhetoric wouldn’t bring peace.

On the same day Biden accused Russia of genocide, Newsweek published an article quoting a senior official from the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency who said the civilian casualties in Ukraine are typical of modern warfare and “hardly” amount to genocide.

The DIA official: said "I am not for a second excusing Russia's war crimes, nor forgetting that Russia invaded the country."

"But the number of actual deaths is hardly genocide. If Russia had that objective or was intentionally killing civilians, we'd see a lot more than less than .01 percent in places like Bucha," the official emphasized.

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com www.zerohedge.com
Click to expand...

President Trump said our intelligence agencies are not to be believed. He stood up in Helsinki and said Vladimir Putin is more trustworthy and believable than the intelligence agencies. Did that suddenly change?

I noticed everyone cited in the article is anonymous. Are we believing articles that cite anonymous sources now too?
 
tres borrachos said:
President Trump said our intelligence agencies are not to be believed. He stood up in Helsinki and said Vladimir Putin is more trustworthy and believable than the intelligence agencies. Did that suddenly change?

I noticed everyone cited in the article is anonymous. Are we believing articles that cite anonymous sources now too?
Click to expand...
Anonymous sources are to be believed only if they say bad things about democrats. Under no circumstances are they to be believed otherwise.

Republicans have no shame when it comes to hypocrisy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom