HeteroDefenseLeague said:
It is interesting to notice how homosexuals extremists,
Exactly who are these "Homosexual extremists?"
I keep hearing this term, but never a definition of what exactly makes a homosexual an extremist. Is it homosexuals who actually utilize their FREEDOM OF SPEECH? Or is it homosexuals who simply disagree with you?
HDL said:
who claim they are so proud of their abnormal behavior,
Ok, here we go again. What is SO wrong with a behavior that is "adnormal?" Does it harm you or anyone else? Does it infringe on your rights or make a victim or you or others? No.
Liking licorice could be concidered an "abnormal behavior." Being left-handed an easily fall into the same catagory of "abnormal."
HDL said:
can't seem to try to describe their sexual behaviors in a correct term, i.e., "homosexual".
Ah, so when heterosexuals call themselves "straight" even though it really means errect, is that simply an Oxymoron? Concidering most of them behave more like Cromagna man!
HDL said:
Instead they take a term that is defined as meaning: "happy", and attempt to co-opt then redefine it, and even get stupid, mindless heterosexual lemmings to go along with their little political propaganda terms.
"lemmings" you mean those of the ultra-right-wing who, even when faced with facts, can't seem to let go their religious beliefs and impose them upon EVERY citizen?
Those are the REAL lemmings.
As far as the word; "Gay" being used to mean a homosexual, if you read the paragraph bellow, it will become quite ovbious that it was "reclaimed" by homosexuals after having been pinned with that term by HETEROSEXUALS!
Several possibilities exist, but the acronym for Good As You is not one of them.
The most likely explanation is that it derives from gaycat or geycat, a slang term for a tramp or hobo who is new to the road. Gaycats were commonly in the company of older tramps, implying a homosexual relationship. The term, according to Lighter, dates to at least the 1890s. Gaycats were employed as lookouts while other hoboes committed crimes. The OED2 cites the 1935 Underworld & Prison Slang by N. Ersine as defining geycat as a homosexual boy. The origin of gaycat is unknown. Green, however, says a gay cat was a tramp who offered sexual services to women.
Another possible origin is the late nineteenth century slang usage of gay to mean promiscuous. A gay house meant a brothel. This sexual sense of the term could have become associated with homosexual promiscuity and the heterosexual sense lost.
http://www.wordorigins.org/wordorg.htm
So, don't go blaming GAYs for the word...
HDL said:
This is done in an attempt to "sanitize" then repackage their behaviors for marketing purposes. So much for "gay pride".
Word "repackaging" is a phenominon that has existed throughout time.
BTW: the Nazi's claimed they were "sanatizing" their country when they EXTERMINATED as many as 5,000 to 15,000 homosexual (or PERCEIVED homosexual) men.
In 1977, Lautmann and his co-authors established that between 5.000 and 15.000 men had been sent to concentration camps because of homosexual offenses, while about half of them died or were murdered there. Before, this persecution had often been denied while, at the pro-gay side, the Protestant Church of Austria had claimed 220.000 murdered homosexuals.(2) Rainer Hoffschildt is preparing a list of the names of all men persecuted for homosexual offenses by the Nazis. In the book of essays edited by the Heinrich Böll Foundation, he expects to come to a number of 5-7000 men but does not speak out about the number that died in these camps of death. He warns also not to use the number of cases of homosexual offenses persecuted by the Nazis in the period 1933-1945 (about 50.000) as equalling the number of victimised men because many were repeat offenders. At the other hand, gay men as well as lesbian women were persecuted under other legal provisions for example against asocials, insane people or vagrants.
http://www.triangles-roses.org/persecution_gays.htm
HDL said:
Interesting how a homosexual extremist feels that if they are denied just a couple of rights,
A COUPLE? You call being denied nearly 1,100 rights and protections...A COUPLE?
Here's the list...you tell me if you would now like to continue this lie?
(the list starts on page 2 of this PDF file)
List of rights and protections attached to marriage.
HDL said:
just like society denies the right to people to engage in drunk driving, zoophilia and heroin use,
You truly have a twisted way of looking at things. How many times do you need to be told; drunk driving, zoophilia and heroin use...ALL CREATE VICTIMS! Being homosexual DOES NOT.
No matter how much spin you put on it, the fact remains, someone BEING homosexual causes no harm to anyone, creates no victims (unless you count the persecution, extermination, murder and other crimes of HATE perpetrated against homosexuals themselves!)
HDL said:
they think that all the other responsibilities to all the other rights they all have all of a sudden should be suspended....
Responcibility of marriage is to "Love, honor and cherrish; in sickness and in health; for richer and for poorer; until death do us part." Where in that does it say anything different than what we homosexuals WANT to take part in?
What laws decree responcibilities of which homosexuals are saying they don't want to take part in?
HDL said:
Using their false logic, since homosexual extremists actively work to deny heterosexual people their rights to freedom of association and to be left alone,
How's that?
Exactly how are homosexuals denying you any rights whatsoever?
How is "freedom of association" linked to "freedom to enact laws which discriminate based on religious beliefs?"
HDL said:
all heterosexuals should have no responsibilities.
Talk about your "false logic." Again, as has been said before:
All Eagles are birds, all penguins are bird. But all eagles are NOT penguins.
Your line of logic skips quite a few steps here.
HDL said:
Homosexual extremists, as long as they don't break laws, have all the rights associated with being a citizen,
Wait for it....here it comes...the big "BUT"
HDL said:
they just don't get any of the rights to marry like heterosexuals get,
Therein lies the problem!
Are you simply not seeing it?
You said it yourself. Homosexuals are NOT afforded the right to marry! Therefor curbing a right to "freedom of association" which you whine about, but actually have and take completely for granted.
HDL said:
so they have all the responsibilities associated with citizenship with the exception of any of the responsibilities that allegedly come from being married.
Who exactly died and made you all Gawd? Since when do we, as citizens of this country, have the right to make the choice for anyone else?
If it does not cause harm, creates no victims, why do so much to make sure homosexuals can't gain access to it?
All I see is your failed logic trying to justify your religious hate as a means in which to base laws.
Sorry, but our government is SECULAR, not "Christian" as so many of your kind try to pawn off.
Zoophiles still have to pay taxes....
Zoophiles aren't trying to gain access to marriage laws. Zoophilia creates victims.
Don't even try that bit of truly flawed logic, it just won't fly.