Not sure why republicans say anything but according to the supreme court it is left to each state to decide. Leave it at that.
Because states won't leave it at that.
Republicans went to the courtroom of one of the
most notorious Trump judges in the country and asked to join the lawsuit that could revoke FDA approval of the abortion pill, mifepristone. That suit was filed almost a year ago, and we’re currently waiting to see if the Supreme Court will
take up the case on appeal. Experts agree that the anti-abortion doctors don’t have standing to sue, and many people think the court will agree to hear the case and then rule against the doctors.
That fact may explain why, on Friday, Nov. 3, the Republican attorneys general from Missouri, Kansas, and Idaho
filed a motion to intervene in Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk’s court, claiming their states are
also being injured by the approval of the abortion pill back in 2000. These Republican AGs are swooping in to join the case at the eleventh hour, and it certainly looks like they’re worried about SCOTUS ruling against the plaintiffs, doctors from the
shadowy Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine.
This is desperately cynical.
The Post-Dobbs Legality of Out-of-State Abortion Travel Bans
On June 24, 2022, with the case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , the U.S. Supreme Court overturned its 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade , setting off a cascade of abortion bans in 26 states. [1] However, lawmakers in several states, such as Arkansas, South Dakota, Texas, and Missouri, are
Ohio’s voters approved a constitutional amendment guaranteeing an individual right to abortion and other kinds of reproductive health care.
Despite victory at the polls, abortion rights advocates are expecting legislative challenges about the amendment’s language. “That’s not going to end the fight,” Mann says.
Where I live the decision has zero impact on women.
Can you cite a source for that?