• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NFL Fines/Suspensions for legal hits

RedAkston

Master of Shenanigans
Administrator
Moderator
Dungeon Master
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Oct 12, 2007
Messages
54,141
Reaction score
40,124
Location
MS Gulf Coast
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
This is a gross over-reaction to players getting injured. Of all the "questionable" hits this past week, only one would fall under "excessive" IMO and that was the Meriweather hit. These guys make an outrageous amount of money to play a game. They know the risks involved and they are over-compensated for it financially. Does a police officer working in South Central LA make the money that the lowest paid NFL player does? Isn't his job more dangerous? Do members of our armed services make anywhere near the money that NFL players make? Isn't their job more dangerous? Does a teacher working at an inner city public school in Detroit make anywhere near the money that the NFL players make? Isn't their job more dangerous?

I'm completely OK with going after excessive helmet-to-helmet hits, such as Meriweather's, but I see this as nothing more than an over-reaction. Football is a violent sport and it's violence is a big reason that it is so popular. Football has surpassed basketball and baseball in terms of popularity long ago primarily for this reason. But football can learn a valuable lesson from baseball. When a player gets hit by a pitch intentionally in baseball, there is retaliation from the other pitcher. When a player gets taken out due to a violent hit in football, you take out one of theirs. Let the players work this out and keep the fines out of it.
 
I think the reaction we are dealing with right now is simply that a reaction to something violent. There were a lot of players hurt Sunday from helmet to helmet and to avoid Congress getting involved (for some reason) the NFL took a harsh stance. I think once the outrage that has seem to come out from this goes away then the penalty will die down.
 
It is stupid and gonna mess up game:(
 
I think it really depends on how the NFL draws the lines here. I have no problem with fining or suspending players for hits that are clearly and egregiously illegal. To the best of my knowledge, that's all they've said they're planning on doing. If they tried to expand it to punish players for hits that are borderline or legal but painful, I'd have a problem. That's not happening yet, so I'm not too concerned.
 
O man who remembers chuck ceceil? that guy was the man. He was vicious! We need more players like him!
1011_large.jpg
 
That's nothing. Put Ray Lewis next to the likes of Lambert or Butkus. He'd look like a *****.
 
In Charlotte they are putting some type of tracking devices in senior football players helmets so they can track what these hits do to the players.

Wondering if this is just in Charlotte, NC or everywhere..
 
Back
Top Bottom