• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New York to pay unemployed illegals up to a one-time $15,600 stimulus payment

surfguy74

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 6, 2020
Messages
165
Reaction score
153
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative

The total cost to taxpayers amounts to $2.1 Billion. Word is that it would not be payed through new taxes but backfilled from the tens of millions that NY is getting from the $2.1 Trillion Stimulus Bill

Americans should be outraged!
 

The total cost to taxpayers amounts to $2.1 Billion. Word is that it would not be payed through new taxes but backfilled from the tens of millions that NY is getting from the $2.1 Trillion Stimulus Bill

Americans should be outraged!
Well, when you give a big tax break to the rich it screws the little guy right up the ***hole.

So I guess the perverts got to reciprocate.
 

The total cost to taxpayers amounts to $2.1 Billion. Word is that it would not be payed through new taxes but backfilled from the tens of millions that NY is getting from the $2.1 Trillion Stimulus Bill

Americans should be outraged!


Breitbart is your source?

:LOL:

extremeright061.png

Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda as well as numerous false claims.
 

The total cost to taxpayers amounts to $2.1 Billion. Word is that it would not be payed through new taxes but backfilled from the tens of millions that NY is getting from the $2.1 Trillion Stimulus Bill

Americans should be outraged!
If study's are to be believed, NYC had a net loss of 70,000 residents in 2020 with avg income of new residents lower than that of outgoing residents. If payouts such as this go through, it will certainly burden the taxpayer so should be interesting.
 

The total cost to taxpayers amounts to $2.1 Billion. Word is that it would not be payed through new taxes but backfilled from the tens of millions that NY is getting from the $2.1 Trillion Stimulus Bill

Americans should be outraged!
1-No such thing as an illegal
2-Americans are too busy taking advantage of the benefits derived from American employers employing undocumented workers to be outraged.
 
If study's are to be believed, NYC had a net loss of 70,000 residents in 2020 with avg income of new residents lower than that of outgoing residents. If payouts such as this go through, it will certainly burden the taxpayer so should be interesting.
It's not going to burden the taxpayers of NY if the money is covered by funds received by NY under the Federal $2.1 Trillion Stimulus Bill. It's comes out of all our pockets.
 
There is no limit to how much the Democratic Party will steal from disabled and fixed income American seniors on social security to give it to illegal immigrants.
 
I forgot that this is a Liberal Forum. It's alright if it's reported by the NYT vs Breitbart. Excuse me but I'm not a stinking Liberal
Breitbart is an unreliable highly rightwing biased source, while the NYT is a moderately biased leftwing source. Both Breitbart and the NYT reporting this shows that it's not something Breitbart made up. From mediabiasfactcheck.com:
Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on word and story selection that moderately favors the left but highly factual and considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well-respected journalists/editors.
 
Breitbart is an unreliable highly rightwing biased source, while the NYT is a moderately biased leftwing source. Both Breitbart and the NYT reporting this shows that it's not something Breitbart made up. From mediabiasfactcheck.com:
The last desperate attempt to derail a top is citing the fake blog "Media Bias Fact Check" - designed only for THE most gullible.

Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is a website founded in 2015 by editor Dave Van Zandt. The website has been described as an amateur effort to rate news media sources based on +factual accuracy and political bias.
Media Bias/Fact Check - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Alexandra Kitty, in a 2018 book on journalism, described MBFC as an apparent "amateur/civic outfit" and wrote that its founder's only qualification was a degree in communications.When Journalism was a Thing. Zero Books. p. 158.

The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst." The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2018/heres-what-to-expect-from-fact-checking-in-2019/

Media Bias Fact Check is either inept and/or dishonest.
Siewert goes on to write that Just Facts is “a deceptive site because they do use facts, but not all the facts in order to mask their right Bias.” As proof of this, she cites two articles that take issue with the Stanford Law Review paper cited by Just Facts. Neither of these articles appeared in a journal, and one of them is from a publication “written and published entirely by Harvard undergraduates.” Siewert does not even attempt to prove whether the critiques have any factual or logical value.

Media Bias Fact Check: Incompetent or Dishonest? - Just Facts
“Media Bias Fact Check,” a media outlet that claims to be “dedicated to educating the public on media bias and deceptive news practices,” is either inept or dishonest.
www.justfactsdaily.com

Anyone citing Media Bias Fact Check might as well be citing The Onion.
 
There is no limit to how much the Democratic Party will steal from disabled and fixed income American seniors on social security to give it to illegal immigrants.
You got that right. And now Biden wants to send $4 Billion to the corrupt governments of El Salvador, Guatamala and Hondures with a hope and prayer that they will provide enough assistance to their citizens so they won't head to the US Border. That's what Kamala is meeting with them about.
 
I guess Republicans still want slaves. Not that this is a surprise. Racists gonna be racist.

Key word here is "workers."
...the first tier of the program, which provides $15,600 to undocumented workers who can meet strict eligibility requirements, according to the analysis. Additionally, 199,000 workers would qualify for the second tier of the program that pays $3,200 per worker, the analysis found.

The first tier portion of the program is meant to pay what an undocumented worker would have received in federal unemployment benefits, while the second tier pays what those workers would have gotten from the three rounds of stimulus payments.
 
You got that right. And now Biden wants to send $4 Billion to the corrupt governments of El Salvador, Guatamala and Hondures with a hope and prayer that they will provide enough assistance to their citizens so they won't head to the US Border. That's what Kamala is meeting with them about.
Maybe that's a better plan than building a leaky wall.
 
Democrats prioritize illegals over American workers every time. Yes, they are illegal; they broke the law coming in and should be sent back. Follow the damn laws. It's not rocket science.
 
Only one REASON democrats want illegals here-VOTES!!! Their policies are not popular with American citizens, so they have to bus a lot of illegals from other countries.
 
Back
Top Bottom