And how do you figure that? They had land that they used, farmed, hunted, and lived on. Then they couldn't use that land anymore and in the vast majority of cases were not compensated in any way.
That's not what he said. He said discuss this on social media, while went straight to you remark about be forced to host. Two completely different things.
tres,
I based my comment off the quotes in the article which implied to me cracking down on both sharing the content of mass shooters (as we know that inspires other shooters) and the people spreading the great replacement theory. I have a different interpretation of the article than you perhaps?
There is missing information: Does the job market hold both of them, do they take the same wage, are we wanting "Americans" to do better than counterparts or are we just concerned about filling the slot?
Do you have another net work? Glen Becks The blaze closed down years ago, meanwhile you have 500 liberal channels to choose from
This is the question you can never answer
They had a culture that didn't value land ownership. It (the land and their culture) was definitely taken from them though.
They believed no man owned the land, that it was there for all to use. I guess we showed them differently.
Entertainment....
Yeah I guess you guys will remain weak and powerless in media
Republicans aren't the party of identity politics though. Trump was/is a symptom of the disease. A disease most people willingly overlook due to personal bias and or what they deem important. HOW they get those things is extremely important. Kindness is gone, compromise is gone and that is NOT on one party, no matter what the media or others say.
If you want to read his meanderings, just buy Tucker Carlson's book, or read the manifesto from the Christchurch shooter.So, a killer wrote a 180 page "screed" (which I can't find anywhere, and I'd like to read it, so I could know what the hell the guy was writing, rather than rely on the media to tell me what they think it says), and so NY Governor Hochul thinks that nobody should be allowed to talk about "replacement theory."
Buffalo shooting spurs Gov. Hochul to call for crackdown of social media: ‘instruments of evil’
Citing the vile online manifesto attributed to the Buffalo shooter, Gov. Hochul on Sunday urged social media companies to crack down on hate speech— calling the sites“ instruments of ev…www.bostonherald.com
All we apparently get to know, though, is that the 180 pages consisted of racist memes and slurs, and that he repeatedly talked about "the great replacement" or something. We don't get to read it ourselves now. And, now Hochul wants to make it illegal to refer to any "replacement," which, of course, to Democrats means that nobody should be able to say that illegal immigration is a problem because it's changing American demographics quickly and unsustainably. If you say that, then it's a form of "replacement theory."
One can already see where this is going. They'll take a psycho's "manifesto" of a seriously mentally ill person who shot people in a tragic and horrid incident, and they'll overlay that on anything "conservative" or "right wing" (which nowadays is anything right of Mao, and that will be called "hate speech" which must be censored from the internet, lest someone act violently.
Social media isn't the government and yes, this shows that there should be some responsibility held by social media sites when this stuff happens....making them civilly liable for allowing nonsense like this on their platform isn't regulating speech.So, a killer wrote a 180 page "screed" (which I can't find anywhere, and I'd like to read it, so I could know what the hell the guy was writing, rather than rely on the media to tell me what they think it says), and so NY Governor Hochul thinks that nobody should be allowed to talk about "replacement theory."
Buffalo shooting spurs Gov. Hochul to call for crackdown of social media: ‘instruments of evil’
Citing the vile online manifesto attributed to the Buffalo shooter, Gov. Hochul on Sunday urged social media companies to crack down on hate speech— calling the sites“ instruments of ev…
All we apparently get to know, though, is that the 180 pages consisted of racist memes and slurs, and that he repeatedly talked about "the great replacement" or something. We don't get to read it ourselves now. And, now Hochul wants to make it illegal to refer to any "replacement," which, of course, to Democrats means that nobody should be able to say that illegal immigration is a problem because it's changing American demographics quickly and unsustainably. If you say that, then it's a form of "replacement theory."
One can already see where this is going. They'll take a psycho's "manifesto" of a seriously mentally ill person who shot people in a tragic and horrid incident, and they'll overlay that on anything "conservative" or "right wing" (which nowadays is anything right of Mao, and that will be called "hate speech" which must be censored from the internet, lest someone act violently.
bullshit
Of course it is regulating speech, it just isn't the government regulating speech (unless of course the government calls for it ...)
then it isn't regulating free speech under the 1st amendment...which prohibits the government from regulating it. The private platform can be lawfully held liable and yelling fire in a theatre isn't free speech.