- Joined
- Jan 16, 2019
- Messages
- 23,439
- Reaction score
- 29,643
- Location
- Near Boise, ID
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Which one of the Trump's will be the first to go on dancing with the stars?
Not at all. That's a different topic, and has nothing to do with people, at best, improperly handling ballots in a system that we want no question of integrity over.
You are rationalizing things that are clearly suspicious. Nothing suspicious should happen in the first place.
Please stay focused on the topic, and stop trying to derail it.
They will not be regarded ar poorly as those who still thing Al Gorre won, or Kerry won. At least here, there is very suspicious things on record. Unless these can be proven not to be tampering, tthen this will prevail in many peoples minds as a stolen election.So in 8, 10, 12 years when folks are still arguing that Trump won reelection what are we to call them, besides "idiots", you know like Truther's and Birther's?
How about Duncer's?
And we can call Biden the Trouncer.So in 8, 10, 12 years when folks are still arguing that Trump won reelection what are we to call them, besides "idiots", you know like Truther's and Birther's?
How about Duncer's?
I watched the video. After everyone left, there were only 5 people there. They were all counting ballots. So, where was this mysterious 6th person overseeing the counting? Where were these poll watchers they claim were there after the counting "closed for the night".Yes, sort of. In the thread that was closed, I mentioned that, when I was watching the data come in. There was a sharp change in momentum. I wouldn't say 100% went to Biden, since other precincts were reporting too.
Deny reality all you want. We all see it.There's nothing suspicious. Your boy got slaughtered. Life goes on.
They will not be regarded ar poorly as those who still thing Al Gorre won, or Kerry won. At least here, there is very suspicious things on record. Unless these can be proven not to be tampering, tthen this will prevail in many peoples minds as a stolen election.
Well so far a judge cant see it. LolDeny reality all you want. We all see it.
Deny reality all you want. We all see it.
Can you show a single example of that or you are just making up crap?They will not be regarded ar poorly as those who still thing Al Gorre won, or Kerry won.
Only the really small minded and low intellect people.this will prevail in many peoples minds as a stolen election.
I watched the video. After everyone left, there were only 5 people there. They were all counting ballots. So, where was this mysterious 6th person overseeing the counting? Where were these poll watchers they claim were there after the counting "closed for the night".
Where is the election observer in the video? What is his/her name? If not in video, why not? How were the ballots allowed to be processes when observers/police/ etc. told to go?
Anybody can lie.
What happened is most certainly against state law.
Well, this one will most certainly make it to the courts. The eye witnesses will testify then. You are correct in that there might be a logical reason, but I don't see it.
There have been so many people who have testified of election irregularities and illegal actions. Did you see the video regarding Detroit? Very compelling evidence.
No, my dad is harvey firestone, i have never worked a day in my life. Tell me why that mattersthere was 2 observers. They left when they saw most of the workers leaving since no more ballots were going to be processed, which is the part they are required to be there for.
have you never had a job?
No, my dad is harvey firestone, i have never worked a day in my life. Tell me why that matters
To what point would you call or convene some costly, real bipartisan hearing, before what pertinent body, to have folks testify about what they might have or not have heard and might have or might have not misunderstood, all to satisfy some curious notions of disinterested parties in regards something that is totally irrelevant in the first place? Why they left is irrelevant because what took place in that room after they had gone was in no way nefarious, corrupt, illegal, sneaky, fraudulent or untoward but was legal and above board SOP.
Were they to go to those lengths what might might be the outcome if discovered an Election Unit Manager had directly told them to leave, perhaps only mistakenly, or with some overt intent? That Elections Unit Manager might be fired? Might be reprimanded? Might simply be told "don't do that again"? It certainly would not in any way shape or form be evidence of any voting fraud or corruption. It certainly would not result in any vote tally changes.
Why should the good people of Georgia foot the bill for such a needless hunt for some guilty party, that if found, would not change a thing regarding the fact Joe Biden won the right to the Georgia Electoral College votes?
This is a good question and i hate to do what I'm gonna do but how would you feel about leaving it up to a public ademidum. If more then a certain number agree on an audit, one takes place. Cool?To what point would you call or convene some costly, real bipartisan hearing, before what pertinent body, to have folks testify about what they might have or not have heard and might have or might have not misunderstood, all to satisfy some curious notions of disinterested parties in regards something that is totally irrelevant in the first place? Why they left is irrelevant because what took place in that room after they had gone was in no way nefarious, corrupt, illegal, sneaky, fraudulent or untoward but was legal and above board SOP.
I notice jail time isn't included in your options. Why not? Where do you rank election fraud on the justice scale, big deal or not?Were they to go to those lengths what might might be the outcome if discovered an Election Unit Manager had directly told them to leave, perhaps only mistakenly, or with some overt intent? That Elections Unit Manager might be fired? Might be reprimanded? Might simply be told "don't do that again"? It certainly would not in any way shape or form be evidence of any voting fraud or corruption. It certainly would not result in any vote tally changes.
Why should the good people of Georgia foot the bill for such a needless hunt for some guilty party, that if found, would not change a thing regarding the fact Joe Biden won the right to the Georgia Electoral College votes?
I'm fine with feds financing it but that creates s problem of separation of powers. Its the states responsibility to provide reliable votes so it should be on them to finance audits.
Well, this one will most certainly make it to the courts. The eye witnesses will testify then. You are correct in that there might be a logical reason, but I don't see it.
There have been so many people who have testified of election irregularities and illegal actions. Did you see the video regarding Detroit? Very compelling evidence.
I have shifted my mind from believing that Biden did squeek in an unexpected win, to now believing there was a mass conspiracy. And I am no conspiracy theorist.
That is why some of them want Trump to declare Martial law and after he does that seeing most of the Constitution is suspended he can declare him self KINGthey already have done this. multiple times.
they have nothing left to prove.
you people will never be happy till Trump is made president for life
The problem is it was a lie they obviously told them so they would to leave, that way they could run ballots through the machines without being observed.
.
having a hard time coping, huh?OK... Lets redux the complete election. All of it
exactlyProve it.
yepThis isn't going to happen. We are not redoing the election because Trump is a sore loser and Trump supporters believe in crazy conspiracy theories.