Trump was right again. The idiots at team Biden made the cure worse than the virus.
So we have already been shown that mask don’t work but dam the torpedoes.
Wear 3 of them.
Then the lockdowns so valued in the blue states. Well guess what? A John’s Hopkins study has found they didn’t work either.
Brilliant
============
A new study out of the renowned Johns Hopkins University has concluded that global lockdowns have had a much more detrimental impact on society than they have produced any benefit, with researchers urging that they “are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.”
The study was authored by Jonas Herby, special advisor at Center for Political Studies in Copenhagen, Denmark; Lars Jonung, professor emeritus in economics at Lund University, Sweden; and Steve H. Hanke, a Professor of Applied Economics and Founder & Co-Director of The Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise.
The authors wrote that “While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted.”
True believers will never admit they were wrong...even after the mask mandates, social distancing, and killing the economy were all proven to be agenda and not science driven.Next time I get sick I'm going to an economist, I mean who needs medical professionals!
Trump is dumb as a bag of rocks and so are his followrs.
The study is a working paper that isn’t peer-reviewed; authors of the paper are economists with no expertise in epidemiology
The paper was described by several outlets as a “Johns Hopkins study”. This description is problematic for several reasons. One reason is that only one of the three authors, Steve Hanke, is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University.
The second is that the study wasn’t endorsed by the university. Finally, describing the paper as a “study” could mislead readers into believing that the paper is a peer-reviewed published study, which it is not. Even the authors themselves described it as a working paper, meaning that it is still a work in progress and hasn’t been peer-reviewed by other scientists
Misrepresents source: The working paper’s analysis included some studies that actually concluded lockdowns to be beneficial in reducing COVID-19 mortality. But the paper’s authors instead represented these studies as showing that lockdowns were detrimental.
Misleading: Several reports about the working paper labeled it as a “Johns Hopkins study”. However, only one of the paper’s three authors is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University and the paper wasn’t endorsed by the university. Experts also pointed out certain issues in the paper’s methodology that call the reliability of its conclusions into question
Claims that a "Johns Hopkins study" showed lockdowns are ineffective at reducing COVID-19 mortality are based on a working paper with questionable methods
A lockdown is a non-pharmaceutical intervention that is typically defined as a measure that requires people to stay at home and avoid activity outside the home involving public contact. A lockdown can comprise different restrictions, ranging from stay-at-home orders to business closures. The...healthfeedback.org
Debunk my a$$This was already debunked.
Authors were economists and not epidemiologists
Paper has not been peer reviewed.
Its not from Johns HopkinsDebunk my a$$
Yea, so many here can debunk Johns Hopkins studies. LMAO
Trump was right again. The idiots at team Biden made the cure worse than the virus.
So we have already been shown that mask don’t work but dam the torpedoes.
Wear 3 of them.
Then the lockdowns so valued in the blue states. Well guess what? A John’s Hopkins study has found they didn’t work either.
Brilliant
============
A new study out of the renowned Johns Hopkins University has concluded that global lockdowns have had a much more detrimental impact on society than they have produced any benefit, with researchers urging that they “are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.”
The study was authored by Jonas Herby, special advisor at Center for Political Studies in Copenhagen, Denmark; Lars Jonung, professor emeritus in economics at Lund University, Sweden; and Steve H. Hanke, a Professor of Applied Economics and Founder & Co-Director of The Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise.
The authors wrote that “While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted.”
Trump was right again. The idiots at team Biden made the cure worse than the virus.
So we have already been shown that mask don’t work but dam the torpedoes.
Wear 3 of them.
Then the lockdowns so valued in the blue states. Well guess what? A John’s Hopkins study has found they didn’t work either.
Brilliant
============
A new study out of the renowned Johns Hopkins University has concluded that global lockdowns have had a much more detrimental impact on society than they have produced any benefit, with researchers urging that they “are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.”
The study was authored by Jonas Herby, special advisor at Center for Political Studies in Copenhagen, Denmark; Lars Jonung, professor emeritus in economics at Lund University, Sweden; and Steve H. Hanke, a Professor of Applied Economics and Founder & Co-Director of The Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise.
The authors wrote that “While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted.”
And this is where the paid trolls hobble off to find another whopper to use for another dumb thread.Its not from Johns Hopkins
"The views expressed in each working
paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the institutions that the authors are
affiliated with." -- page 2
But from independent researchers hijacking JH's good name and were not endorsed by JH.
Sorry VySky, you were bamboozled yet again.
He just looks for any propaganda he can push.Sorry VySky, you were bamboozled yet again.
Actually, the poster read the title, did no cross referencing.He just looks for any propaganda he can push.
he plays the Fox News game.Actually, the poster read the title, did no cross referencing.
Ignorant post to appeal to the ignorant
He believes eye doctor Rand Paul over actual epidemiologists when it comes to COVID.He just looks for any propaganda he can push.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?