• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Neocons are wrong - Iranians Want Democracy

Catz Part Deux

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
28,721
Reaction score
6,738
Location
Redneck Riviera
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Moderate
For thos who think that this is a battle between fundamentalist Islamics and even more fundamentalist Islamics, and are tempted to dismiss the goals of these protests...they're wrong.

Commentary: Iranians want more democracy - CNN.com

 
Re: Neocons are wrong - Iraqis Want Democracy

Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite:

1984 – tehranbureau

 
Re: Neocons are wrong - Iraqis Want Democracy

What's a neocon?
 
Re: Neocons are wrong - Iraqis Want Democracy

Moderator's Warning:
Thread moved as its Commentary/Opinion. Additionally, this thread is not "What are neocons". No actions taken immedietely, but if posters try to derail this thread into a long discussion of what is or isn't a neocon instead of actually discussing the meat of this topic they will be booted and invited to make a new thread, or join the dozens of others, that are actually dedicated to that question.
 
Re: Neocons are wrong - Iraqis Want Democracy

Thanks dude, and sorry for posting in the wrong place.
 
It would help if the ever eloquent President Obama would use that eloquence for something more than a political Hallmark card and stake a stand, stop hedging his bets and do what the always inarticulate President Bush did during the Ukrainian Orange revolution, unequivocally support the Iranian democratic movement.

He will get no brownie points from the theocratic thugs should they hang on for attempting to play the all wise friend of all sides.
 
As long as it involved no physical intervention from the US I agree
 
Catz-With all do respect what does being a NEO-Con have to do with Iran, as a matter of fact it's the NEO-Cons who have been backing this whole uprising and trying to get Mr. Obama to be more firm on it.

As for the question what is a NEO-Con I give you this answer via Wiki,
[ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism]Neoconservatism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]
 
She could be referring to the Iranian N/C, neocons are not the sole domain of America
 
Last edited:
As long as it involved no physical intervention from the US I agree

Absolutely. Obama has a unique opportunity here, his verbal support for the democratic movement can not be played as an US militarist ploy against Iran as he opposed the Iraq war and offered the Iranian theocrats and olive branch.

But Obama needs to learn how to use the rhetorical stick as well as talk softly.

There is no military solution here on behalf of the Iranian democratic movement, they have to fight their own fight, but we can let them know we are on their side. Which is really, our side.

Just support for those brave Iranians who want to determine their own future.

Afterall, what does human rights mean if not that?
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…