- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 34,478
- Reaction score
- 17,282
- Location
- Southwestern U.S.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Seriously folks... Read this story and tell me, is there a snowballs chance in hell that any news network or newspaper would have sat on such a story if it were a republican running for office? If your answer is "yes", seek help immediately from the closest mental health facility in your area and please for Christ's sake... drink something else besides Kool-Aid 24/7.
Why Did NBC News Sit on Explosive Story About Clinton’s Alleged Hacked Email Server For Weeks? | LawNewz
Why Did NBC News Sit on Explosive Story About Clinton’s Alleged Hacked Email Server For Weeks?
by Chris White | 11:24 pm, May 4th, 2016
<Key Excerpt>
As you can see from the transcript, Lazar is openly admitting to hacking Clinton’s private e-mail account. The same private e-mail account where federal officials found over 2,000 e-mails that contained classified information, including at least 22 deemed to contain “Top Secret” information. That is pretty explosive information. To note, Clinton’s campaign has already fired back, in a statement saying “There is absolutely no basis to believe the claims made by this criminal from his prison cell.”
Now, this is where things get a little strange. As was noted earlier, NBC News says Lazar made these claims to McFadden during an interview in a Bucharest prison and we know Lazar was extradited to the United States on or about March 31, 2016. So, it stands to reason that McFadden conducted the interview before he was extradited to the U.S. which means NBC News was sitting on these explosive claims for more than one month. Which begs the question, why would a major news network sit on such an explosive allegation — especially when the claim directly relates to a presidential candidate and the biggest story the 2016 presidential election cycle?
Why Did NBC News Sit on Explosive Story About Clinton’s Alleged Hacked Email Server For Weeks? | LawNewz