- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 52,184
- Reaction score
- 35,955
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
How is it a narrow picture? Conservatives always call for a fairer, flatter tax. So how is it acceptable when the wealthy pay a lower rate? The lengths conservatives will go to protect the wealthy is unbelievable.
Is it your attention span, or are you intentionally being obtuse? What does that have to do with your claims of sacrifice? Oh, Romney's Daddy was rich? From what i understand, Romney started at the bottom of a very small investment firm. He delivered mail to the executives.. Doesn't sound like Ole Dad was very helpful, perhaps it was due to the fact that his Dad was a conservative as well? Just like my kids.. I mad ethem go out and shovel snow from driveways last weekend. Why? because they need to know how to earn their own way, and exactly how value is placed on money and hard work.
Tim-
Its a narrow picture as it only looks at it from one vantage point.
I'd suggest you avoid stereotyping, especially incorrect stereotyping. Conservatives in general call for a flatter INCOME tax system typically. For myself, I don't mind a progressive income tax system though I believe significant reform would need to be done for it. I also think that comparing INCOME tax to CAPITAL GAINS tax, when the two things are taxing ENTIRELY Different things that contribute to the economy in entirely different ways is an illegitimate comparison, especially when one attempts to act like they're speaking of the exact same thing.
You missed the point. Why would an individual paying 14% of his $24 million income, represent more of a hardship than an individual paying 22% of his $50,000 income?
You are implying that he is somehow making more of a sacrifice that someone who makes $50,000 that pays a greater proportion of his income in taxes and that is BS.
I want you to re-read what you just said about "values" and "hard work", then tell us again exactly how Mitt Romeny "earned" his money.
I agree with your latter point that we need to find ways to reduce the cost of our entitlement programs and reduce military spending, but my point here is for a political party that's so eager to cut federal spending, the policies each candidate would follow would actually increase federal spending.
Better hope Rick stays in.He's right, though, on Gingrich being a lobbyist. I say this as a guy who will never pull the lever for Mitt. It amazes me what Newt is able to get away with.
With 10 months to go, you can claim that, because you saw one hour and forty minutes of television.
omg Romney sounds like a spoiled brat that isn't getting his way. He sounds horrible IMO, he is imploding. Romney needs to get back to attempting to show Republicans how he can lead conservatively. Holy crap I can't believe it is degenerating into a ****fest. These guys need to stop its starting to look bad for all of them.
Interesting take you guys had.
My initial impression was that Gingrich had a bad night. He seemed old and a bit weak tonight. He was under attack, and never really got going.
Romney looked a lot stronger to me. He's not a great debater, so he's not going to pump a lot of people up, but this performance was night and day from last week. He looked like a leader.
Santorum had a good night, but he's still Rick Santorum. He's just not going to be the guy.
Oh, and Ron Paul was there too.eace
Poor debate performance from the whole field, IMO.
Meh.
It appears the candidates are going to destroy any chance the GOP had of winning the presidency by tearing each other apart like harpies in debate after debate. Do they not realize that many undecided voters are watching these debates and deciding Obama isn't so bad after all? This debate was particularly damaging to Romney - and I still feel he was the only candidate that could have realistically beaten Obama, but after the last two debates I feel that chance is gone. Newt has too many skeletons that Obama will be able to bring out one at a time and dance before the public for months and months. Santorum is, well he is Santorum. And there is no way the GOP would let Paul win the nomination.
I seriously have heartfelt sympathy for the GOP.
I can make that claim because each of the GOP candidates exposed the hypocrisy of Conservatism from the Right.
You'll be voting for Obama, so what's your point?omg Romney sounds like a spoiled brat that isn't getting his way. He sounds horrible IMO, he is imploding. Romney needs to get back to attempting to show Republicans how he can lead conservatively. Holy crap I can't believe it is degenerating into a ****fest. These guys need to stop its starting to look bad for all of them.[/QUOTE]
So, let's spell out what we've learned from last night's debate.
Ron Pau. Definitely without a doubt the GOP outsider! He totally and utterly EXPOSED THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN PARTY by saying their policies have led us to where we are today, but stating that Republicans are not ready to govern, that the party is in a mess and needs to change. HE SAID THAT. Those were Ron Paul's words (or atleast in summary).
Newt Gingrinch. Talk about the consumate Washington insider! Not only has Newt followed in the footsteps of Conservatism since 1964 - HIS OWN ADMISSION - but he lead the charge for instituting conservative policies, as well as ushering in this latest montely crew of misfits Tea Parties that has John Boehner having nightmares! Again, BY HIS OWN ADMISSION, Newt Gingrinch was intimately involved with those issues - policies that Ron Paul openly admitted have the country in the economic condition it's in NOW! Moreover, Newt was a lobbyist! No way he can deny this now. Mitt Romney effectively and totally exposed him! Talk about crony capitalism at its best! My God!! Unless you just went deft at that point, how do you ignore the obvious conflict of interest there? YOU CAN'T!!!
Mitt Romney. For all the finger pointing he did towards Newt, he didn't do himself any favors either. His tax policy was so damned stupid! How the hell are middle-class wage earners to take advantage of the tax policies he'd usher in, i.e., tax credit on savings, investing, etc. Does he really think the middle-class has the kind of "investment dollars" he has? Clearly not since his tax cut would start at the upper level = $200K. Not so sure his ideas are good ideas, but people will hear that and shift alittle to his side without really thinking it through because...well, it sounds nice.
Santorum. This guy is a piece of work. He's isolate the U.S. from any other nation he believes is "hostile" to America. That's half the world right there (atleast if you listen to Conservative Republicans tell it). No working with Cuba, for example, at all until the Casto family line is completely gone! What an assinine foreign policy to have....just wait until the ruling family line dies off, then we'll talk. Thank God the Russians killed Hilter before he and Eva Brown could have kids. :roll: And let's not forget that HE IS THE MOST CONVERSTIVE CANDIDATE ON THE PANEL...following in lock-step with the Tea Party. YES! The same political group that once again has caused Speaker Boehner fits AND led to the first credit rating downgrade this country has ever experienced!! Come on, people! Wake up!!
Not one of these candidates is fit to lead this nation. NONE!!! Again, listen to what they say and put their words in their proper context where economic, domestic and foreign policy is concerned in relation to where our society is today and then it will all start to make sense. Obama couldn't have done better to expose the hypocrisy of the Republican Party than these guys did by themselves.
Thats a lie. 86% of all americans pay taxes.And I want to examine how 47% of the US population pay no taxes. And then apply that to your overall philosophy. What do the 47% do to contribute? What do the folks on welfare who are perfectly capable of working do to earn their welfare checks?
We can do this all day?
Tim-
The capital gains tax is an "investment tax".
The income tax is a "wage tax".
The payroll tax is a "labor tax".
If you combined the wage tax with the labor tax and compare their rates to the capital gains tax rate, most people will very likely discover that they pay a much higher overall tax rate than Mitt Romney does and they put in HARD WORK...LABOR for less earnings. How the hell is that fair?
I can make that claim because each of the GOP candidates exposed the hypocrisy of Conservatism from the Right.
You'll be voting for Obama, so what's your point?
Ignoring the fact that his capital investments could've potentially lead them to have the oppertunity that allowed them to do said "HARD WORK". That said, when did I say that it was "fair". If you'd like I could link you to my comments in another thread concerning what my view is in regards to the attempt to be "fair" with regards to a tax system.
I find that hard to believe when you factor in tax credits and exemptions. Where are the statistics to support that?
Then lobby for a tax overhaul? What is your idea of a fair tax system? Do you believe only successful people should pay taxes?
Tim-
I'm implying no such thing; you're simply inferring it based on your own prejudiced view of what you believe conservatives think or stand for. I am not implying that he is making more of a scarifice, I'm stating that speaking about his impact in the scheme of things regarding taxes simply by looking at the percentage of his total monetary intake is a ridiculously narrow way to view it.
I don't get your point then, other than he is very wealthy. He is paying a smaller portion of his income in taxes than are millions of Americans. How do you justify that?
How do you jump from my position - that those who's income is primarily from investments shouldn't pay a lower tax rate than someone making $50,000,
to your strawman that "only successful people should pay taxes?"
Do you read your own links, pal? I am correct, and YOU are wrong. 47% of American's FY09 paid no federal income tax, PERIOD..
Tim-
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?