• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Navy to name aircraft carrier after Ford

Navy Pride

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
39,883
Reaction score
3,070
Location
Pacific NW
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
This is great to see and well deserved.....Its a great honer to have and aircraft carrier named after you.......

Lets see now we have Aircraft Carriers named after Reagan, George HW Bush and Gerald Ford........

The question that begs to be asked is why was Clinton skipped? I think we all know the answer for that......

Navy to name aircraft carrier after Ford - Yahoo! News


WASHINGTON - The Navy will name its next aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford in honor of the president who was buried Wednesday in his home town of Grand Rapids, Mich., officials said.
 
This is great to see and well deserved.....Its a great honer to have and aircraft carrier named after you.......

Lets see now we have Aircraft Carriers named after Reagan, George HW Bush and Gerald Ford........

The question that begs to be asked is why was Clinton skipped? I think we all know the answer for that......

Navy to name aircraft carrier after Ford - Yahoo! News


WASHINGTON - The Navy will name its next aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford in honor of the president who was buried Wednesday in his home town of Grand Rapids, Mich., officials said.
Ford, Reagan, George HW Bush....

The question is why was Carter Skipped.....
They just haven't made it to Clinton yet.... :rofl
 
Ford, Reagan, George HW Bush....

The question is why was Carter Skipped.....
They just haven't made it to Clinton yet.... :rofl

Yeah I forgot about "Peanut".......I wouldn't hold your breath on Clinton if I were you..
 
I would be proud to serve on any ship named after our former president, Jerry Ford..... (just as long as it was West Pac;) )

May he rest in peace. An exemplary man who reminded us all what a president is supposed to be.

It's a shame we really haven't seen one like that since.

I bet he'd roll over in his grave if Mr. Bush arranged for a "Mission Accomplished" banner to be displayed on his namesake ship's bulkhead. He had some pretty strong opinions about all that it has been reported.
 
II bet he'd roll over in his grave if Mr. Bush arranged for a "Mission Accomplished" banner to be displayed on his namesake ship's bulkhead.
Are you suggesting Bush has arranged for such a banner in the past?
 
I would be proud to serve on any ship named after our former president, Jerry Ford..... (just as long as it was West Pac;) )

May he rest in peace. An exemplary man who reminded us all what a president is supposed to be.

It's a shame we really haven't seen one like that since.

I bet he'd roll over in his grave if Mr. Bush arranged for a "Mission Accomplished" banner to be displayed on his namesake ship's bulkhead. He had some pretty strong opinions about all that it has been reported.

That Mission Accomplished sign was put up by ships company on the carrier signifying their deployment was complete.............
 
And yet, all the evidence debunks that lie. Whatever.







White House spokesman Scott McClellan told CNN that in preparing for the speech, Navy officials on the carrier told Bush aides they wanted a "Mission Accomplished" banner, and the White House agreed to create it.

"We took care of the production of it," McClellan said. "We have people to do those things. But the Navy actually put it up."





and now, the rest of the story...

CNN.com - White House pressed on 'mission accomplished' sign - Oct. 29, 2003
 
you conveniently forgot this part

"The banner was a Navy idea, the ship's idea," Chun said.

"The banner signified the successful completion of the ship's deployment," he said, noting the Abraham Lincoln was deployed 290 days, longer than any other nuclear-powered aircraft carrier in history.


Regardless of how the left tried to spin it (unseuccessfully I might add. Voters didn't fall for it), the banner was not trying to suggest that our war on terror was accomplished.
 
That is left wing spin and you know it...............






CNN.com - White House pressed on 'mission accomplished' sign - Oct. 29, 2003

White House spokesman Scott McClellan told CNN that in preparing for the speech, Navy officials on the carrier told Bush aides they wanted a "Mission Accomplished" banner, and the White House agreed to create it.

"We took care of the production of it," McClellan said. "We have people to do those things. But the Navy actually put it up."
 
you conveniently forgot this part

"The banner was a Navy idea, the ship's idea," Chun said.

"The banner signified the successful completion of the ship's deployment," he said, noting the Abraham Lincoln was deployed 290 days, longer than any other nuclear-powered aircraft carrier in history.


Regardless of how the left tried to spin it (unseuccessfully I might add. Voters didn't fall for it), the banner was not trying to suggest that our war on terror was accomplished.



The banner (produced by the White House) President Bush so fondly stood under was indeed conveniently trying to suggest something... :cool:
 
Better be careful Kid:

Current Affairs will post the administration's spin and then claim that he made "Mincemeat" out of you....in some manufactured debate.
The very link that kidrocks provided (from CNN, not the administration) makes the mincemeat for me. It clearly says what the banner stood for. All you two have to do is read it.
 
The very link that kidrocks provided (from CNN, not the administration) makes the mincemeat for me. It clearly says what the banner stood for. All you two have to do is read it.

Again....I love how you think that this post proves your point. I don't think you understand what "Mincemeat" is.

So....what about the part from Scott McClellan that says that the banner was produced by the whitehouse?

You can accept an after the fact statement from the Navy that it had nothing to do with the President declaring major military action complete and the first Victory on the "war on terror"......I find it rather ironic that the whitehouse gives contradictory statements prior to this.....and then when it turns into yet another major blunder for Bush....this Navy spokesman comes out with this explanation....

But that aside.....even if you accept the statement as truthful.....The speech by Bush was clearly intended for political purposes.....and you would have to find it highly coincidental that the Administration spin doctors didn't decide to take complete advantage of using the banner.....even if you accept the explanation that it wasn't its intended purpose....

It just so happened to be a really stupid political move.....and it backfired....thats all.....thats politics.
 
Yeah I forgot about "Peanut".......I wouldn't hold your breath on Clinton if I were you..
Wasn't Ford President BEFORE Carter and didn't he have to die first? Didn't Reagan have to die first? Didn't Bush 41 have to have his son cut the line for him?

DUMB, DUMB, and DUMBER....
 
Again....I love how you think that this post proves your point. I don't think you understand what "Mincemeat" is.

So....what about the part from Scott McClellan that says that the banner was produced by the whitehouse?

You can accept an after the fact statement from the Navy that it had nothing to do with the President declaring major military action complete and the first Victory on the "war on terror"......I find it rather ironic that the whitehouse gives contradictory statements prior to this.....and then when it turns into yet another major blunder for Bush....this Navy spokesman comes out with this explanation....

But that aside.....even if you accept the statement as truthful.....The speech by Bush was clearly intended for political purposes.....and you would have to find it highly coincidental that the Administration spin doctors didn't decide to take complete advantage of using the banner.....even if you accept the explanation that it wasn't its intended purpose....

It just so happened to be a really stupid political move.....and it backfired....thats all.....thats politics.
It backfired for those who wish to believe it backfired. Those who know better don't fall for the rhetorical spin. I knew what the banner was for - even before the left tried to turn it into a big election year flap.
 
Why are you allowed to call others names so often?
Read it again...I wrote that the post's conclusions concerning Ford, Reagan and Bush 41 were Dumb, Dumb and Dumber because the claim was that Carter was passed over having a boat named after him...simply because he's not dead or do you have some incredible proof to disprove my claim?

Did you conveniently forget that Carter was in the Navy and was highly decorated? Did you?

Prove me wrong.....
 
Read it again...I wrote that the post's conclusions concerning Ford, Reagan and Bush 41 were Dumb, Dumb and Dumber because the claim was that Carter was passed over having a boat named after him...simply because he's not dead or do you have some incredible proof to disprove my claim?

Did you conveniently forget that Carter was in the Navy and was highly decorated? Did you?

Prove me wrong.....
It was clear that you called Navy Pride dumb, despite your backpeddling.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Sorry NP, but this is no longer classified as Breaking News....read the rules, it must be from within the past 48 hours.

EVERYONE....knock it off with the bickering. This thread is about Ford...not Champs...not disneydude...not CurrentAffairs....FORD.

Keep it that way.
 
Back
Top Bottom