- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Messages
- 110,044
- Reaction score
- 27,592
- Location
- Houston, in the great state of Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
I suggest you watch a little bit of it don't worry they're not going to program you. And then every definitive thing they say fact check it.Excellent post and something I had not considered. I don't watch liberal shows so I wasn't aware but it makes perfect sense. Pfizer withheld its vaccine discovery until after the election because they didn't want to help Trump. They are the same company that donated 7 million to the CDC in one year and continues. YES, the CDC can and does get donations.
Accusations that are actually confessions aren't interesting. Maybe a strawman with an appeal to emotion would be more entertaining. Either way, it just doesn't seem to be happening here.And you said something rather ignorant and got called out on it
Even if you have already had covid you can still get it again.You folks always conveniently forget about those who already had covid.....we are not talking about those who have not had it. Why is this?
So can you. However, some studies say natural immunity is stronger and lasts far longer.Even if you have already had covid you can still get it again.
The point is natural immunity is a long term thing and in the mean time you are taking unnecessary risks.
Vaccinations are the best option by far.
And some studies don't.So can you. However, some studies say natural immunity is stronger and lasts far longer.
And some studies don't.
Still striving for natural immunity is taking a much higher risk.
And some studies don't.
Still striving for natural immunity is taking a much higher risk.
You are not getting it at all. I am referring to those who already HAD covid and the study done in Israel and just plain ole common sense.And some studies don't.
Still striving for natural immunity is taking a much higher risk.
Seems like you feel the stingAccusations that are actually confessions aren't interesting. Maybe a strawman with an appeal to emotion would be more entertaining. Either way, it just doesn't seem to be happening here.
An even if you have the vaccine you can get Covid.Even if you have already had covid you can still get it again.
The point is natural immunity is a long term thing and in the mean time you are taking unnecessary risks.
Walking On The Moon is a favorite. If we're talking solo stuff, then it's definitely Fortress Around Your Heart.Seems like you feel the sting
And in either case the symptoms are going far less dangerous than relying only on developing natural immunity.An even if you have the vaccine you can get Covid.
WeakWalking On The Moon is a favorite. If we're talking solo stuff, then it's definitely Fortress Around Your Heart.
Neither of those tracks even approaches weak.Weak
But if survival is dependant on the vaccine than it has to be.
An even if you have the vaccine you can get Covid.
Tracks like train tracks or deer tracks?Neither of those tracks even approach weak.
Tracks like King Of Pain.Tracks like train tracks or deer tracks?
It's that anything like kingfish?Tracks like King Of Pain.
You don't like King Of Pain? It's a great song.It's that anything like kingfish?
Here we go again. Here's a tip; stay away from ALL hospitals, clinics, doctors, nurses, paramedics and anyone who isn't as paranoid as you clearly are, and who actually knows what they're talking about. And don't call an ambulance when you get sick; call a faith healer and dose yourself with some homeopathic sugar pills.Anyone hospitalized with covid might receive damaging treatments, such as steroids.
Considering Sweden's record is considerably worse than her Scandinavian neighbours I suggest hindsight isn't necessary. Sweden's approach failed, infection rates soared.From your link above: "The authors do say, however, that only once the pandemic and impact of measures taken are fully understood, after one or two years at least, can we begin fairly then to judge what was done correctly."
Hindsight will be better than foresight and I suspect we will learn Sweden's approach was in some ways preferable to the more intrusive lockdowns most other countries attempted, but there is little doubt their approach led to more people be infected and more older and sicker people dying with COVID. But comparing Sweden to the US, Italy or the USA suggests it is too early to conclude what was the best approach. We have to look at the pros and cons of mitigation efforts and I do not believe we know enough yet to draw any frim conclusions about what was and was not reasonable public policy.
Really, then perhaps you can explain why Sweden faired significantly better than the USA, UK, Italy, Belgium, and many other countries in terms of infections and deaths per capita from COVID?Considering Sweden's record is considerably worse than her Scandinavian neighbours I suggest hindsight isn't necessary. Sweden's approach failed, infection rates soared.
Get the shot and stay alive.
Because people took the disease seriously, behaved responsibly, isolated themselves, kept social distances and didn't waste their breath whining about 'freedom' or some 'right' they think is being violated?Really, then perhaps you can explain why Sweden faired significantly better than the USA, UK, Italy, Belgium, and many other countries in terms of infections and deaths per capita from COVID?
Really, then perhaps you can explain why Sweden faired significantly better than the USA, UK, Italy, Belgium, and many other countries in terms of infections and deaths per capita from COVID?
Or dont get the shot and stay alive.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?