I feel it is in the interests of our nation to extend that power to the federal government.
I feel it is in the interest of our nation to keep the power of the federal government limited to it's defined powers and goals while maintaining emphasis on the rights and liberties of the individual.
Because it makes it harder to acquire firearms anonymously and it helps combat illegal importation of firearms.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
How does it do anything you've just said? Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Prove it. Fact is, we have some huge boarders and smuggling into this country isn't hard. Furthermore, there can be theft of legally purchased (and registered if the fascists have their way) guns. Point is, there is well enough illegal guns out there to provide enough supply. All you need to do is know the right guy. And guess what? Most criminals intent on violent gun crime...they know the right guy.
Face it, you ain't gonna do **** other than infringe upon the proper rights and liberties of the individual.
I refuse to believe that any functioning human with brain intact would in honesty ask this question. You have a list of who has guns and what guns they have. Can you honestly not see how that would aid in confiscation?
I dont see that Hawaii is a valid testing ground for a nation-wide network.
So you reject the only real data there is and accept your made up fantasy world which you have no data, statistics, or proof for. Yet even in the absence of any of this, you will still call for government force against the rights and liberties of the individual. Wow.
That's why we have government oversight and controls to prevent this from happening.
Tell that to the oil oversight folk who were doing cocaine off hookers asses and taking bribes left and right from the oil companies.
Make it a requirement for CC permits, purchasing, trading, and exchanging of any firearms that their registration be checked against the database.
So basically, infringe against the 4th to practice the 2nd eh? That's real great.
For reasons I have already outlined.
And none in which you logically gave any reason why the 2nd and 4th amendment rights of the individual should be infringed upon.
Maybe you should ask. I dont support civilian disarming, I support reasonable allowances for civilian firearm ownership but I dont support disarming civilians.
I could claim I'm anti-gravity, but pro letting go of puppies from the top of a building. Doesn't change the reality of what I'm doing. These sorts of fascist attempts at the rights and liberties of the individual lead only one place....slavery.
This kind of rhetoric I rather expected: mildly paranoid and entirely un-supported.
If you're speaking of your own arguments, then yes.