• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mussolini and Hitler were right wing dictators


Is North Korea a democracy? They’ve got the word Democratic in their name, after all?

No, they acted like a far right movement and were supported by the far right across the continent.
 
They were pro capitalist which is why the large capitalists were backing them
Hitler once said to Otto Wagener that the problem with the politicians of the Weimar Republic was that they “had never even read Marx.” He believed that the problem of German Communists was that they didn’t understand the difference between principles and tactics. He referred to them as mere pamphleteers, whereas “I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun.” He stated plainly that “the whole of National Socialism” was based on Marx
 

What “Marxist” fills his high command with noblemen and aristocrats?
 
Hitler had the support of capitalists because he was pro capitalist
Your attempts to pretend that they weren't fail because reality disproves your silly claim
 
Hitler had the support of capitalists because he was pro capitalist
Your attempts to pretend that they weren't fail because reality disproves your silly claim
And yet you can’t . Because you are wrong.
 
Hitler had the support of capitalists because he was pro capitalist
Your attempts to pretend that they weren't fail because reality disproves your silly claim
And yet you can’t . Because you are wrong
Hitler was very much supported by big business and industrialist capitalists.

View attachment 67482400

Hitler was very much supported by big business and industrialist capitalists.

View attachment 67482400
George Sorros is a ? Who supports leftwing Socialism. And your point is?
 
George Sorros is a ? Who supports leftwing Socialism. And your point is?

Nobody in 1930s Germany was confused over whether the Nazis were right wing or not. It was well known they were.
 
I've not limited the definition of anything to "fit" my world view. Small government conservatives are who they are. Modern American liberals are who they are. And Nazis were who they were. Which of those terms do you think I somehow defined so narrowly as only to match only my worldview?
 
I've not limited the definition of anything to "fit" my world view. Small government conservatives are who they are.

"Small government conservatives" exist as you think they do only in your mind.

Modern American liberals are who they are. And Nazis were who they were. Which of those terms do you think I somehow defined so narrowly as only to match only my worldview?

All of them, really. You only want to view conservatism as you think it *should* exist, while the Nazis and liberals exist in a way you find convenient.

The Nazis ran on a political platform that said their way of life was under attack by a shadowy international clique of wealthy people who were using their money and influence to undermine their culture and society.

That describes the increasingly vocal "alt right" to a T, and while that doesn't make them the equivalent of Nazis, it perfectly illustrates where the relationship lies.
 
"Small government conservatives" exist as you think they do only in your mind.
No, not just there, but now you're having to change your argument. First I was redefining terms and now, suddenly, you're saying people like me don't exist.

Make up your mind.

All of them, really. You only want to view conservatism as you think it *should* exist, while the Nazis and liberals exist in a way you find convenient.
I will go so far as to say more of them should exist, yes.

The Nazis ran on a political platform that said their way of life was under attack by a shadowy international clique of wealthy people who were using their money and influence to undermine their culture and society.
And there's another parallel, George Soros and Jeffrey Epstein.

That describes the increasingly vocal "alt right" to a T, and while that doesn't make them the equivalent of Nazis, it perfectly illustrates where the relationship lies.
Sounds like you're defining the right to fit your world view.
 
No, not just there, but now you're having to change your argument. First I was redefining terms and now, suddenly, you're saying people like me don't exist.

That wasn't a change in argument, that was pointing out that what you believe exists as a political reality is in fact just a figment of your imagination.

"Small government conservaties" as a whole voted for increased military budgets want to go after businesses for political reasons, and enshrine abortion bans on the national level.

*You* may not believe that, but that doesn't matter, your word does not invalidate the voting habits of hundreds of politicians.

I will go so far as to say more of them should exist, yes.

Sure, we all want more people to fit our worldview. It would be great if more Americans realized that Republicans are responsible for less job growth and more recessions on average than Democrats.

And there's another parallel, George Soros and Jeffrey Epstein.

^Case in point.

Sounds like you're defining the right to fit your world view.

not at all. The alt right does not encompass all the right or I would argue even a majority of conservatives.

I would actually argue the contrast between the noninterventionist protectionist nationalist alt right, the likes of MGT and such, and their clash against the more Reaganite neoconservatives of McConnel and such are the biggest problems facing the American right.