• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mussolini and Hitler were right wing dictators

Whoever added 'right-wing' to the description was simply wishing because that is certainly NOT conservative.
Facts matter.

Fascists and nazis have always been right wing, they have always been defined as such, and nazis and Fascists today still consider themselves right wing.

As I have proved to you.
 
No, they were much closer to the left than the right: expansive government, centralized political authority, national industrial policy, anti-competition, anti-markets, and largely intolerant of differing political views.
this is true if you treat the "right" as classical liberalism when liberalism is actually in the center of politics. This is incredibly basic political knowledge and you just don't get it.
 
this is true if you treat the "right" as classical liberalism when liberalism is actually in the center of politics. This is incredibly basic political knowledge and you just don't get it.
I've clarified my use of the term "right" in this thread to mean small government conservatism. I accept there are people on the right who are not for small government, just big government with different policy objectives.
 
I've clarified my use of the term "right" in this thread to mean small government conservatism. I accept there are people on the right who are not for small government, just big government with different policy objectives.
Do you admit fascists are right wing?
 
I've clarified my use of the term "right" in this thread to mean small government conservatism. I accept there are people on the right who are not for small government, just big government with different policy objectives.
"small government conservatism" is liberalism. Get it right
 
Do you admit fascists are right wing?

I admit they're commonly labeled as right wing. I maintain that in practice their methods are closer to liberals than they are small government conservatives.
 
Try as you might, they were right wing dictators. Even communism was rightwing despite the word play. As soon as one becomes a dictator it doesn't matter what they claim to be, they're far right. When freedom is taken away, Far Right...
 
Try as you might, they were right wing dictators. Even communism was rightwing despite the word play. As soon as one becomes a dictator it doesn't matter what they claim to be, they're far right.
Sorry, I don't accept dogma as valid reasoning.
 
All I can tell you is the democracy is the worst form of govt. besides all the others. You want to take us out of the frying pan and into the fire.
 
Sorry, I don't accept dogma as valid reasoning.
& I don't take faux political science as truth. When they take away freedom, they're Far Right. Stalin didn't run a communist country. He dictated what was to be with no intent of making the proles partners in the endeavor. Plus there was an elite group who didn't share in the deprivation. As is Pooten, now. Dictators may pay lib service to left wing ideals, but y'all gotta look at the reality.
 
I admit they're commonly labeled as right wing. I maintain that in practice their methods are closer to liberals than they are small government conservatives.
Yet the self avowed fascists and Nazis that organized the Charlottesville rally, called it the "Unite the Right" rally, not the Unite the left rally.

They know which side they are on, why don't you?
 
Try as you might, they were right wing dictators. Even communism was rightwing despite the word play. As soon as one becomes a dictator it doesn't matter what they claim to be, they're far right. When freedom is taken away, Far Right...
Bingo. The right are the ones that want to take away rights and see the people as nothing but pawns in their quest for absolute power. They try to trick them into liking being pawns with empty promises and demonizing the opposition by projecting their evil ambitions on them.
 
I admit they're commonly labeled as right wing. I maintain that in practice their methods are closer to liberals than they are small government conservatives.
Which is untrue unless you try to redefine the meanings of the terms
 
I admit they're commonly labeled as right wing. I maintain that in practice their methods are closer to liberals than they are small government conservatives.
Stop beating a dead horse. There is no such thing and small Govt. conservatives. That is a myth that only rears its ugly head when the right is out of power.
 
No, they were much closer to the left than the right: expansive government, centralized political authority, national industrial policy, anti-competition, anti-markets, and largely intolerant of differing political views.
Sounds like trump
 

Well....DUH.
 
Were Stalin’s methods closer to big government liberals or small conservatives?
 
Which is untrue unless you try to redefine the meanings of the terms
What is “untrue?” Don’t paraphrase. Quote the words I wrote that you believe are false and explain why you believe they’re false.
 
I've clarified my use of the term "right" in this thread to mean small government conservatism.

You're conflating libertarian conservatism with the commonly-understood meaning of "right", and really, as it applies to fascism, we're talking about "ultra-right" or "far-right" politics. Libertarian conservatism is where liberalism meets conservatism.

I accept there are people on the right who are not for small government, just big government with different policy objectives.

Good, because when we're discussing fascism or right-wing authoritarianism (i.e., Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, etc), we're not talking about Ludwig von Mises, Jeffersonian, or Milton Friedman conservatism; we're talking about police states and regimes that basically allow for-profit capitalism to exist provided that enterprises are aligned with the regime's political agenda first. Such regimes tend to award government contracts and award or pull businesses licenses on that basis.
 
What is “untrue?” Don’t paraphrase. Quote the words I wrote that you believe are false and explain why you believe they’re false.
That a mythical creature if your own invention is closer to fascists than a unicorn
 
That a mythical creature if your own invention is closer to fascists than a unicorn
And with that you’ve demonstrated you’re lying. You didn’t quote anything I said because you know if you did you wouldn’t be able to prove it to be untrue.

You might want to run along now.
 
No, you simply have that wrong. Were I attempting to define the entirety of the right as being small government conservatives you would have a point, but I’m not, so you don’t. “The right” does include small government conservatism, but the right is not defined exclusively by small government conservatism. I made this point earlier.

You’re clinging to labels without thinking about how degrees of government authority create similarities and differences. But thanks for brining up for-profit capitalism being “aligned with the regime’s political agenda,” i.e. government exercising its authority and dictating what businesses should and should not do as opposed to the more limited role of maintaining open and fair markets. That is a specific example of what the progressive left has in common with totalitarian regimes: politically motivated industrial policy. Small government conservatives reject that.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…