• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Musk declines seat on Twitter board.

Luce

Weaponized Funk
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 31, 2020
Messages
27,476
Reaction score
17,990
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Twitter’s largest investor, billionaire Elon Musk, is reversing course and will no longer join the company’s board of directors less than a week after being awarded a seat.

Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal announced the news, which followed a weekend of Musk tweets suggesting changes to Twitter, including making the site ad-free. Nearly 90% of Twitter’s 2021 revenue came from ads.

However, a number of the tweets posted by Musk over the weekend regarding potential changes at Twitter no longer appear on the platform.

“Elon’s appointment to the board was to become officially effective on 4/9, but Elon shared that same morning that he would not be joining the board,” Agrawal wrote in a reposted note originally sent to Tesla employees. “I believe this is for the best.”

Agrawal didn’t offer an explanation for Musk’s apparent decision. He said the board understood the risks of having Musk, who is now the company’s largest shareholder, as a member. But it, “believed having Elon as a fiduciary of the company, where he, like all board members, has to act in the best interests of the company and all our shareholders, was the best path forward,” he wrote.

Poor Trump. He's STILL not getting his twitter account back.
 

GummyVitamins

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
7,541
Reaction score
5,435
Location
ve, ver, vis, vis, verself
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I was surprised he was expected to accept it in the first place. There's a reason he bought 9.x% of the company and not over 10%. With 10% you have to be beholden to different rules as a shareholder. Additionally, as a board member, he would have separate rules as well. However, as the largest minority shareholder, he has shareholder rights that he can use as leverage to fight Twitter. He can sue Twitter for violating the rights of shareholders when they do things like violate their own terms of service to ban popular revenue-generating users from their platform. He has more power and has more of an ability to be a thorn in their side if he doesn't join the board.
 

RaleBulgarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2018
Messages
35,053
Reaction score
19,056
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I was surprised he was expected to accept it in the first place. There's a reason he bought 9.x% of the company and not over 10%. With 10% you have to be beholden to different rules as a shareholder. Additionally, as a board member, he would have separate rules as well. However, as the largest minority shareholder, he has shareholder rights that he can use as leverage to fight Twitter. He can sue Twitter for violating the rights of shareholders when they do things like violate their own terms of service to ban popular revenue-generating users from their platform. He has more power and has more of an ability to be a thorn in their side if he doesn't join the board.
Cite, with links, proof of any instances when Twitter violated it’s terms of service in banning any users.
 

RaleBulgarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2018
Messages
35,053
Reaction score
19,056
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent



Poor Trump. He's STILL not getting his twitter account back.
Loser #45 isn’t going to be allowed back on Twitter. So many sad Trumpsters. 😭
 

Jkca1

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 10, 2021
Messages
1,013
Reaction score
709
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
This was an intelligent decision. I applaud it.
 

Helix

Administrator
Moderator
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
84,079
Reaction score
74,888
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
He said it out loud when he bought the stock. Trump's name wasn't mentioned, but he said he'd disallow bans for the very sorts of things Trump got banned for.
Tweety broke the ToS. If it's OK to break ToS if you are a cult leader or take iodine baths, the rules should say that.
 

itstony

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 16, 2019
Messages
3,152
Reaction score
4,177
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
I was surprised he was expected to accept it in the first place. There's a reason he bought 9.x% of the company and not over 10%. With 10% you have to be beholden to different rules as a shareholder. Additionally, as a board member, he would have separate rules as well. However, as the largest minority shareholder, he has shareholder rights that he can use as leverage to fight Twitter. He can sue Twitter for violating the rights of shareholders when they do things like violate their own terms of service to ban popular revenue-generating users from their platform. He has more power and has more of an ability to be a thorn in their side if he doesn't join the board.
Don't you mean insurrection raising members? I think that's what this was all about.
 

Airyaman

New Druid
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 4, 2018
Messages
20,135
Reaction score
17,790
Location
AL
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Damn, with this and the sinking ship of Truth Social, how ever will the deplorable masses be able to hear from their messiah?

More rallies!
 

Luce

Weaponized Funk
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 31, 2020
Messages
27,476
Reaction score
17,990
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
I still have no idea how this ever tied in to Trump. Did Musk bitch about Trump losing his twitter once?

Musk was part of Trump's science thingie, and as far as I can tell, Musk would have no other reason to care.
 

Cardinal

Respected On All Sides
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
97,987
Reaction score
82,937
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Musk was part of Trump's science thingie, and as far as I can tell, Musk would have no other reason to care.
And so aggrieved was he that he purchased $2.9 billion in stock just to give Trump’s account back. Rrrrright.
 

Luce

Weaponized Funk
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 31, 2020
Messages
27,476
Reaction score
17,990
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
And so aggrieved was he that he purchased $2.9 billion in stock just to give Trump’s account back. Rrrrright.

I expect he'll be wanting some dividends, too.

Can you think of a better reason for him to do it, given that he stated the reason he got involved was because "some people" were banned for TOS violations?
 

Cardinal

Respected On All Sides
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
97,987
Reaction score
82,937
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I expect he'll be wanting some dividends, too.

Can you think of a better reason for him to do it, given that he stated the reason he got involved was because "some people" were banned for TOS violations?
I think I’d have to have at least 4000 billion in the bank before it would even occur to me to spend 3 billion to get some dumbass his twitter account back. And if that was his motive, then he’s much crazier than I ever imagined.
 

HangLow

BUFF 52 Nav
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 27, 2020
Messages
12,983
Reaction score
10,191
Location
KCMO & 50K Feet Up 4Reagan4Perot4Obama
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other

sanman

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Messages
9,835
Reaction score
3,351
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Poor Trump. He's STILL not getting his twitter account back.
How the **** did you connect this to Trump?
Don't you remember how Elon was the first to quit the panel of experts Trump had assembled for technology issues, because he had major differences with him?

But to you, everyone is connected to Trump -- and to Putin. Musk is the guy who immediately got Starlink satellite terminals for Ukraine following the invasion. What did you do by comparison?

Neo-McCarthyites only show themselves to be completely morally & intellectually bankrupt. All they can think of is to make up any desperate taunt, like the desperate idiots they are.
 

CaughtInThe

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 4, 2017
Messages
83,609
Reaction score
67,571
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
maybe he can sit on the board here?
 

TheDoctorWasIn

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 6, 2019
Messages
7,796
Reaction score
6,425
Location
In the center of it all.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I was surprised he was expected to accept it in the first place. There's a reason he bought 9.x% of the company and not over 10%. With 10% you have to be beholden to different rules as a shareholder. Additionally, as a board member, he would have separate rules as well. However, as the largest minority shareholder, he has shareholder rights that he can use as leverage to fight Twitter. He can sue Twitter for violating the rights of shareholders when they do things like violate their own terms of service to ban popular revenue-generating users from their platform. He has more power and has more of an ability to be a thorn in their side if he doesn't join the board.

"Revenue-generating users?"

I'm not sure you're grasping Twitter's business model.
 

sanman

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Messages
9,835
Reaction score
3,351
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative

************
View attachment 67385345
*************​


:rolleyes:

you-didnt-build-that.jpg
 
Top Bottom