• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mueller Must Be Investigated For Destruction Of FBI Evidence: Giuliani

Tanngrisnir said:
He already was investigated for this, and they cleared him.
Click to expand...

Really? Link to that, "investigation of Mueller", than KNOW ONE ON THE INTERNET KNOWS ABOUT, or has links to.
 
Grokmaster said:
Zero Hedge, citing Rudy Guiliani's interview with The Hill, where he claimed that Mueller, the Grand Buffoon, ALLOWED THE DESTRUCTION of Strzok's text messages, texts that showed ," show the state of mind and tactics of his lead anti-Trump FBI agent at the start of his probe,"...according to the former NYC Mayer/Federal Prosecutor.


Question for the Pro-Mueller DP members: IF HE DID , INDEED DO THIS...what say you?

(Odds of that question being actually answered, instead of A.) Ad homs on me, B.) desperate deflections, C.) ridiculously invalid "analogies", D.) all other responses other than answering the question asked.....1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Roughly).



Mueller Must Be Investigated For Destruction Of FBI Evidence: Giuliani


Special counsel Robert Mueller needs to be investigated for destruction of FBI evidence, President Trump's attorney Rudy Giuliani said in an interview with Hill.TV's John Solomon and Buck Sexton

Referencing recent reports that Mueller's office allowed text messages from former FBI employees Peter Strzok and Lisa Page to be destroyed, Giuliani levied harsh accusations at the special counsel.

"Mueller should be investigated for destruction of evidence for allowing those text messages from Strzok to be erased, messages that would show the state of mind and tactics of his lead anti-Trump FBI agent at the start of his probe," said Giuliani.

The Inspector General of the DOJ revealed in a report this month that it found large gaps in text message records between Strzok and Page, the top FBI agents in charge of investigating both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump during the 2016 US election. Of note, the two agents harbored extreme animus against then-candidate Trump, while supporting Hillary Clinton - bias which the DOJ claims never made its way into their work.

After Strzok was kicked off the special counsel investigation following the discovery of anti-Trump text messages between he and Page, his Mueller's Records Officer scrubbed Strzok's iPhone after determining "it contained no substantive text messages," reported the Conservative Review's Jordan Schachtel in mid-December.

Referencing recent reports that Mueller's office allowed text messages from former FBI employees Peter Strzok and Lisa Page to be destroyed, Giuliani levied harsh accusations at the special counsel.

"Mueller should be investigated for destruction of evidence for allowing those text messages from Strzok to be erased, messages that would show the state of mind and tactics of his lead anti-Trump FBI agent at the start of his probe," said Giuliani.

The Inspector General of the DOJ revealed in a report this month that it found large gaps in text message records between Strzok and Page, the top FBI agents in charge of investigating both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump during the 2016 US election. Of note, the two agents harbored extreme animus against then-candidate Trump, while supporting Hillary Clinton - bias which the DOJ claims never made its way into their work. After Strzok was kicked off the special counsel investigation following the discovery of anti-Trump text messages between he and Page, his Mueller's Records Officer scrubbed Strzok's iPhone after determining "it contained no substantive text messages," reported the Conservative Review's Jordan Schachtel in mid-December.
From the article:



View attachment 67247171









https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018...T798O8e_PrsORqrDJoua2bpnOmSM0BnYKz0bNt6TAacnA
Click to expand...

What say I?

Nothing will happen.

Tell me...who do you think will investigate Mueller? The DOJ? Congress?
 
beefheart said:
You read zero-hedge?

Nuff said...:lamo
Click to expand...

"Zero Hedge, citing Rudy Guiliani's interview with The Hill," :lamo




Question for the Pro-Mueller DP members: IF HE DID , INDEED DO THIS...what say you?


 (Odds of that question being actually answered, instead of A.) Ad homs on me, B.) desperate deflections, C.) ridiculously invalid "analogies", D.) all other responses other than answering the question asked.....1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Roughly).


Yaawnnn….
 
Cardinal said:
Why do you follow Tyler Durden? What other fictional movie characters do you get your news from?
Click to expand...

Question for the Pro-Mueller DP members: IF HE DID , INDEED DO THIS...what say you?

(Odds of that question being actually answered, instead of A.) Ad homs on me, B.) desperate deflections, C.) ridiculously invalid "analogies", D.) all other responses other than answering the question asked.....1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Roughly).



Right again.


Yawwwwwnnnnn…..
 
Grokmaster said:
"Zero Hedge, citing Rudy Guiliani's interview with The Hill," :lamo




Question for the Pro-Mueller DP members: IF HE DID , INDEED DO THIS...what say you?


 (Odds of that question being actually answered, instead of A.) Ad homs on me, B.) desperate deflections, C.) ridiculously invalid "analogies", D.) all other responses other than answering the question asked.....1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Roughly).


Yaawnnn….
Click to expand...

What if 9/11 really was an inside job....
 
Mr Person said:
What, did you expect Giuliani to announce Trump's guilt?

:lamo






Yeah, that's what the rest of us do when we see you've posted another **** thread.
Click to expand...

What if we put forth some no name lady who aledges that sometime between 30 and 40 years ago, at some unknown place, Mueller sexually assaulted her?
 
Grokmaster said:
Question for the Pro-Mueller DP members: IF HE DID , INDEED DO THIS...what say you?

(Odds of that question being actually answered, instead of A.) Ad homs on me, B.) desperate deflections, C.) ridiculously invalid "analogies", D.) all other responses other than answering the question asked.....1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Roughly).



Yaaaawwnnnnn…..
Click to expand...

If he had wings and could fly and shoot rockets from his arms....what about that?

giphy.gif
 
beefheart said:
And, you have yet to answer about your disaster of a thread where you claimed that Melania is the only first lady to visit a war zone since 1969.

When are you gonna do that....huh?
Click to expand...

What's there to answer about? Lara Bush's trip I forgot about? Ok.


NOW:

Question for the Pro-Mueller DP members: IF HE DID , INDEED DO THIS...what say you?

(Odds of that question being actually answered, instead of A.) Ad homs on me, B.) desperate deflections, C.) ridiculously invalid "analogies", D.) all other responses other than answering the question asked.....1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Roughly).



Right again.


Yaaawwwnnnnn….. the DP left is so predictably WEAK...why? Makes it DULL here....
 
Redress said:
What if 9/11 really was an inside job....
Click to expand...

What if...C A T.....really spelled....dog....







That's our revenge of the nerds moment of the day.
 
beefheart said:
If he had wings and could fly and shoot rockets from his arms....what about that?

giphy.gif
Click to expand...

Question for the Pro-Mueller DP members: IF HE DID , INDEED DO THIS...what say you?

(Odds of that question being actually answered, instead of A.) Ad homs on me, B.) desperate deflections, C.) ridiculously invalid "analogies", D.) all other responses other than answering the question asked.....1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Roughly).



Yaaaawwnnnnn…..
 
Grokmaster said:
What's there to answer about? Lara Bush's trip I forgot about? Ok.


NOW:

Question for the Pro-Mueller DP members: IF HE DID , INDEED DO THIS...what say you?

(Odds of that question being actually answered, instead of A.) Ad homs on me, B.) desperate deflections, C.) ridiculously invalid "analogies", D.) all other responses other than answering the question asked.....1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Roughly).



Right again.


Yaaawwwnnnnn….. the DP left is so predictably WEAK...why? Makes it DULL here....
Click to expand...

Uh, Hillary, Barbara, Laura and Michelle.

You got owned, like you do on every thread.

What is your end game? Are you paid to put out this garbage?

Who are your handlers?
 
Grokmaster said:
What's there to answer about? Lara Bush's trip I forgot about? Ok.
Click to expand...

You forgot about literally every first lady including Michelle Obama.

Actually, you didn't forget. Some crackpot told you that Melania was the first in decades and you just... believed them. Didn't bother to check.
 
Deuce said:
You forgot about literally every first lady including Michelle Obama.

Actually, you didn't forget. Some crackpot told you that Melania was the first in decades and you just... believed them. Didn't bother to check.
Click to expand...

It was just the same old propaganda that his Russian handlers told him to post.
 
Grokmaster said:
Question for the Pro-Mueller DP members: IF HE DID , INDEED DO THIS...what say you?

(Odds of that question being actually answered, instead of A.) Ad homs on me, B.) desperate deflections, C.) ridiculously invalid "analogies", D.) all other responses other than answering the question asked.....1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Roughly).



Yaaaawwnnnnn…..
Click to expand...

Grok you’re a crock
 
KevinKohler said:
What if we put forth some no name lady who aledges that sometime between 30 and 40 years ago, at some unknown place, Mueller sexually assaulted her?
Click to expand...

Then you will have an opportunity to pretend that the entire left automatically believes every single accusation of sexual misconduct, when in fact they did not. This could then be used to call liberals hypocrites.

You will also have an opportunity to present yourself is too good to do that, but to nonetheless pretend that the left are hypocrites not because of that, but because they never believe it when it's against a Dem and do believe it when it's against an R, when in fact that's not the case. So I suppose you could also use that to call liberals hypocrites.



Of course...if you are too good to do that, you already know that there were a whole slew of reasons that various people did not like liberals, none of which relied on some rule of absolute belief. You too will know what this group of people is not fungible. You will recall the many instances where liberals here on DP took varying positions not tied to party in sex assault cases. You will note the treatment of liberals like Weinstein, C.K. Louis and the like by other liberals. You might even recall Al Franken resigning, even though the only thing a Kavanaugh-defender would say was "evidence" was the picture of him merely pretending to be leaning in to grab a woman's breasts, since of course we're supposed to disbelieve accusations even if they're made under oath and even if, at a normal criminal trial, the testimony of a single witness can be sufficient to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.

And so, knowing all this, you'll take back your clever little rhetorical jab and because of how honest and fairly you'll be playing, you will therefore acknowledge that it really depends on all of the unique circumstances of the case.




But really, if you must, you always can pretend like automatically treating accusations as meaningless while attacking the left for automatically doing the polar opposite is scoring some kind of point...
 
Mr Person said:
Then you will have an opportunity to pretend that the entire left automatically believes every single accusation of sexual misconduct, when in fact they did not. This could then be used to call liberals hypocrites.

You will also have an opportunity to present yourself is too good to do that, but to nonetheless pretend that the left are hypocrites not because of that, but because they never believe it when it's against a Dem and do believe it when it's against an R, when in fact that's not the case. So I suppose you could also use that to call liberals hypocrites.



Of course...if you are too good to do that, you already know that there were a whole slew of reasons that various people did not like liberals, none of which relied on some rule of absolute belief. You too will know what this group of people is not fungible. You will recall the many instances where liberals here on DP took varying positions not tied to party in sex assault cases. You will note the treatment of liberals like Weinstein, C.K. Louis and the like by other liberals. You might even recall Al Franken resigning, even though the only thing a Kavanaugh-defender would say was "evidence" was the picture of him merely pretending to be leaning in to grab a woman's breasts, since of course we're supposed to disbelieve accusations even if they're made under oath and even if, at a normal criminal trial, the testimony of a single witness can be sufficient to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.

And so, knowing all this, you'll take back your clever little rhetorical jab and because of how honest and fairly you'll be playing, you will therefore acknowledge that it really depends on all of the unique circumstances of the case.




But really, if you must, you always can pretend like automatically treating accusations as meaningless while attacking the left for automatically doing the polar opposite is scoring some kind of point...
Click to expand...

Believe? Maybe not. But in full support of a completely groundless, politically inconvenient never ending investigation? Absolutely.

Which is the same that is being suggested here.
 
Um...DOJ investigation turns up thousands of missing texts from Peter Strzok and Lisa Page

Seriously, it took all of 10 seconds to find this.

An investigation by the Justice Department’s watchdog into missing text messages from the FBI-issued cellphones of former investigators Lisa Page and Peter Strzok recovered thousands of text messages on agency-issued phones belonging to the pair.

But it did not attribute the missing texts to malicious intent on behalf of the two but rather a technology failure by the FBI’s tool meant to sweep up text messages, according to a new report.
 
Deuce said:
You forgot about literally every first lady including Michelle Obama.

Actually, you didn't forget. Some crackpot told you that Melania was the first in decades and you just... believed them. Didn't bother to check.
Click to expand...

What, do you expect him to admit he was wrong? He's always wrong, always posting lies, propaganda and conspiracy theories and utilizing all caps, bolding and big fonts (which make him more credible he thinks). Just like his hero King TangFace, he's never gonna admit he's wrong.
 
Deuce said:
You forgot about literally every first lady including Michelle Obama.

Actually, you didn't forget. Some crackpot told you that Melania was the first in decades and you just... believed them. Didn't bother to check.
Click to expand...

What, do you expect him to admit he was wrong? He's always wrong, always posting lies, propaganda and conspiracy theories and utilizing all caps, bolding and big fonts (which make him more credible he thinks). Just like his hero King TangFace, he's never gonna admit he's wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom