• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mueller hauled before secret FISA court to address FBI abuses in 2002, Congress told

apdst said:
Mueller has a shady past. Obviously he isn't afraid to break the rules. He violated the law in 75 different cases. This sure don't look good.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&sou...aw0c-LzzWOOWDodarNR2T68k&ust=1549645851667337
Click to expand...

Other sources who worked for Mueller at the time told me the court's concerns arose in 2002 and 2003 — shortly after America was stunned by the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks — when the FISC learned the FBI had omitted material facts from FISA warrant applications in more than 75 terrorism cases that dated back to the late 1990s.

Most of the omissions occurred in FBI work that pre-dated Mueller’s arrival, the sources said. But the court wanted assurances the new sheriff in town was going to stop such widespread abuses.

Mueller told the court the FBI had created a new system called the Woods Procedures — named for the FBI lawyer who drafted them — to ensure FISA warrant applications were accurate and did not omit material information, according to Anderson’s congressional interview.
Click to expand...

So, to summarize:

You are lying when you say that Mueller violated the law in 75 cases. Most of the alleged instances (source for these 75 instances?) happened before his tenure. And very early on in his tenure he enacted policies to prevent this from ever happening.


:lamo
 
What better guy to appoint to this particular investigation?

Someone who knows how to get flawed FISA warrants past the FISA court, in fact, has a history of it.
Using that FISA, based on flawed political paid for oppo research for a FISA warrant against a political opposition candidate, and then a sitting president.
Appointing someone who's connected to all the 'players' in the DOJ and FBI, for the purpose of obscuring and diverting attention from those abuses of power and abuses of process.
Someone connected to Hillary and other Dems.

Some boy scout you got there. :roll:
Doing the political bidding of some, apparently.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom