- Joined
- Oct 15, 2020
- Messages
- 37,056
- Reaction score
- 18,259
- Location
- Greater Boston Area
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
You’re here defending it.I didn't mention the clip. Why do you lie so much?
You’re here defending it.I didn't mention the clip. Why do you lie so much?
If by “we” you’re including Twitter, yes, that’s the point.Can we please get back to Hunter Biden’s laptop?
This is beyond comedy and has hit a new level of absurdity.
Yes, just imagine if something like that were to happen …
Please expound on your point.If by “we” you’re including Twitter, yes, that’s the point.
Me.Apparently the OP clip partially relates to ”lies like the laptop actually belonging to Hunter Biden?”
How many of you agree MSNBC does not need a laugh track?
How many of you found Melber’s commentary funny?
He’s been very clear about his reasons. What problem do you find with them?
No, there is no need to. If you don’t already see the irony in that clip then there is no value in you discovering it now. It would kill the buzz.Please expound on your point.
Read what he (Musk) has said about. I get the sense you haven’t.Call me the cynic if you must, but I do not buy the bumper sticker rhetoric you call "very clear about his reasons."
I am a computer illiterate old man (85) who still has only a flip phone, let alone the ability to post at something called Twitter.You on Twitter, parser?
This is beyond comedy and has hit a new level of absurdity.
Yes, just imagine if something like that were to happen …
Depends on the price they paid.How does Elon Musk’s impending purchase of Twitter and privatizing it affect Hunter Biden and his controversial laptop?
Why would Ari Melber or anyone else question Musk’s ability or underlying motives to set Twitter up as an equal opportunity purveyor/platform for the exchange of written thoughts by Twitter users?
Did any of you watch the OP clip then laugh at Melber‘s commentary? I didn’t find it funny.
So what if Musk called a British caver a “pedo guy”. Vernon Unsworth sued Musk for defamation. An American jury took less than an hour to return a unanimous jury in Musk’s favor.
If the deal goes through as published, congratulations to Twitter stockholders! I wish I held some shares. I’ve already lost 6-figures in the market since Thanksgiving.
I didn't watch it.Apparently the OP clip partially relates to ”lies like the laptop actually belonging to Hunter Biden?”
How many of you agree MSNBC does not need a laugh track?
How many of you found Melber’s commentary funny?
Musk agreed to pay $54.20/share, 38% premium to the stock’s closing price of April 1.Depends on the price they paid.
I know that. But a whole bunch of people paid more than $54.20.Musk agreed to pay $54.20/share, 38% premium to the stock’s closing price of April 1.
Melber does not mention Hunter Biden or Hunter’s laptop. Melber expresses concern that Musk‘s control of Twitter might adversely affect the integrity of our American election processes.I didn't watch it.
Thanks. Was it funny, as was asserted by the OP?Melber does not mention Hunter Biden or Hunter’s laptop. Melber expresses concern that Musk‘s control of Twitter might adversely affect the integrity of our American election processes.
Twitter’s price per share briefly exceeded $52 on Monday, closing at $51.70, highest closing value in about five months.I know that. But a whole bunch of people paid more than $54.20.
I'm not sure what you're point is.Twitter’s price per share briefly exceeded $52 on Monday, closing at $51.70, highest closing value in about five months.
I have to do some ”selling off’ this week, somewhere in the 25-40K range, for a property renovation project.
Not funny.Thanks. Was it funny, as was asserted by the OP?
Most investors already in Twitter or who jumped in after Musk announced his bid stand to profit.I'm not sure what you're point is.
I would love to “sell off” this week just about anything in my portfolio at price per share from five months ago.I'm not sure what you're point is.
You're assuming that they still hold the stock. There's no way to know that.Most investors already in Twitter or who jumped in after Musk announced his bid stand to profit.
It's hard to grasp because political discourse these days is so fluid and each party are hypocrits who change stances based upon the direction the wind is blowing.The real absurdity with this Twitter and Musk fiasco is how quickly everyone abandons free market principles (as well as several other principles) when it no longer suits them.
Musk has every right to buy Twitter, Twitter has every right to organize the sale. Assuming all goes through including privatizing Twitter, Musk has every right to change terms and conditions inviting back whoever the hell he wants to. Those previously kicked off the platform may or may not come back, that is up to them.
However, you have every right to stay or leave the platform no matter what Twitter and/or Musk does.
Given the lackluster successes of Truth Social and GETTR the risk for Musk is going too far with the idea and turning Twitter into the next arguably conservative leaning social media failure. Free market principles still apply, assuming there is demand for an alternative to Twitter someone will step forward and fulfill that demand assuming enough leave.
Why are these things so difficult for so many to grasp?
I don’t have much choice but to make assumptions. I don’t study the financial markets for short term gain.You're assuming that they still hold the stock. There's no way to know that.