- Joined
- Sep 9, 2005
- Messages
- 34,963
- Reaction score
- 12,361
- Location
- Pennsylvania
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
FFS I wasn't being literal. I was presenting an impression to get the point across.You are free to do so but since you invented the whole thing its pretty meaningless
But I do agree with you 100%, that voice you made up in your head does sound like an asshole!
The crazy assumptions you came up with that were nothing like my post in any context or even verbiage what so ever seemed very pompous and ignorant.
IM glad i didnt actually write any of that retarded **** you posted and it was just made up in your head
feel free to answer any of those questions by the way.
Id like to know how you thought my post addressed everybody and called them MFers when only 3-5 people were crying about the speech they didnt like. And also what about that fact led you to the conclusion that it made me awesome lol
You could be a great fantasy writer
FFS I wasn't being literal. I was presenting an impression to get the point across.
You're all "in X number of pages, no one has come up with a good response to FACTS!"
Then 20 pages later you say the same thing.
It makes me think of an asshole crowing about how his side is still winning. Sure, he's right, but that only makes it WORSE. You WANT him to be wrong just so he'll stop. Even though you know it's wrong to want that.
Not just this thread. Many topics you comment on give me this impression, or something like that.again this just seems illogical to me
this is the part i dont get.
whos side are you talking about?
I have no side? in fact in this thread i havent even support a "side"
and how does one(a person) actually "win" if there is no side?
can you tell me what the sides of this thread are?
so im understanding. 3-4 people bashed one group of people practicing free speech and cheered others, some even denied it was free speech for the gorup they dont like. So when I ask for an example and it is ignored thats "my side winning"???
interesting . . . .
my only point was to see if those 3-4 posters could try to defend their factually false claim or could simply just admit they were wrong saying it wasnt free speech.
I know i simply admit when i make a mistake and i seen you do the same. This is why i treat you with integrity and dont play shoot the fish in the barrel with you no matter what you say. :shrug:
some people are incapable of that
well youll find me doing that most places where where somebody was blatantly dishonestNot just this thread. Many topics you comment on give me this impression, or something like that.
I dunno, really.
I suppose your posting style just grates on my nerves for some reason.
I'm perfectly find with calling out stupidity and the like.well youll find me doing that most places where where somebody was blatantly dishonest
unfortunately theres thats not rare, If i could make it rare i would but thats not my call :shrug:
I'm perfectly find with calling out stupidity and the like.
Do it myself, in my own way.
I just disagree with your style and methods, I suppose. They grate.
I'm perfectly find with calling out stupidity and the like.
Do it myself, in my own way.
I just disagree with your style and methods, I suppose. They grate.
Still find it odd that something grates thats not directed at you
but hey to each his own
The New Enemies Lists - Charles Krauthammer, Washington Post
". . . . I had not foreseen how donor lists would be used not to ferret out corruption but to pursue and persecute citizens with contrary views. Which corrupts the very idea of full disclosure. It is now an invitation to the creation of enemies lists. Containing, for example, Brendan Eich, forced to resign as Mozilla CEO when it was disclosed that six years earlier he’d given $1,000 to support a referendum banning gay marriage. He was hardly the first. Activists compiled blacklists of donors to Proposition 8 and went after them. Indeed, shortly after the referendum passed, both the artistic director of the California Musical Theatre in Sacramento and the president of the Los Angeles Film Festival were hounded out of office. . . . "eace
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?