• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mother of Marine killed in ISIS bomb attack has her Instagram account disabled after she blamed Biden for her son's death

This kind of censorship violates every ideal of the 1st amendment.

There have been several parents comment on how cold and insensitive Biden was when he spoke to them and during the transfer. Nobody in that group wanted to hear Joe talk about his son Beau, who did not die because some politician sent him into a terrible situation without a proper plan. Joe is a BS'er and a cold hearted liar.

As has been repeatedly explained, the First Amendment applies to the government. Not private corporations.
 
This kind of censorship violates every ideal of the 1st amendment.

There have been several parents comment on how cold and insensitive Biden was when he spoke to them and during the transfer. Nobody in that group wanted to hear Joe talk about his son Beau, who did not die because some politician sent him into a terrible situation without a proper plan. Joe is a BS'er and a cold hearted liar.
So, while working to defend the parents of some dead children and how they handle grief, you denigrate another parent of a dead child and how they handle grief.
 
Last edited:
"and claimed President 'rolled his eyes' and 'turned his back on her' when she confronted him"





And all the leftists cheered because she's probably a Trumper?

This won't change and will likely grow worse unless, by some miracle, a conservative President and Congress has the backbone to take on the threat by big tech capitalist oligopolies and their shilling for the authoritarian state. The few's stranglehold on free expression and willing suppression of speech for government officials (when directed by Democrats) is an existential threat to all modern social communication and, therefore, the exercise of liberty.

Consider that upon the nation's founding, as a small country of only 2 to 3 million the country already had 400 free presses printing and distributing many thousands of essays of political debate - free of oligopolistic strangulation. The denial of social communication by a single press was inconsequential as there were many others of equal size and distribution to choose - and the press freely reprinted the essays of each other. The idea of a nation-wide banning of a writer or editorialist was both impossible and repugnant to most Americans.

Today, it is far different. Instead of 400 presses for a few million, we have a few choke points run by a handful of elites over the hundreds of millions.

The new "trusts" and "robber barons" of oligopoly control over our social communications are:

Twitter
Facebook
Instagram (owned by Facebook)
Youtube (owned by Google)
Amazon.

No matter who you are, try distributing and selling a book, especially a self-press book, without the cooperation of Amazon - a fool's errand.

Again, no matter who you are, attempt to distribute an contrarian opinion to the a following through Twitter or Facebook (and its puppet Instagram) ... another futile endeavor if you hold the "wrong" opinions.

Four companies can and do censor the vast majority of social and published access in America, all using their monopolistic power to crush thought contrary the cultural taboos of the Democratic party.

And its a reality that won't be changed except by a democratic, or even a violent, coup.
 
"and claimed President 'rolled his eyes' and 'turned his back on her' when she confronted him"





And all the leftists cheered because she's probably a Trumper?
You had me until the last line. Then the true spirit of your post reared its partisan head.
 
You had me until the last line. Then the true spirit of your post reared its partisan head.
Mmhm. Suuuure. My crappy opinion TOTALLY swayed you the other way. Totally believable.
 
So......what's this about this mother? Shot down by her own family members?
 
As has been repeatedly explained, the First Amendment applies to the government. Not private corporations.

Except when government directs private entities to shut down free speech, as has Biden administration officials, it is a violation of free speech. Moreover, there is nothing in the first amendment that protects corporations, including one's in communications, from being subject to the same laws against monopolistic markets and practices as everyone else.

The Big Tech cartel of 4 are classic cases that demand a breakup.
 
Ya

Your crappy opinion did exactly that!
So morality goes out the window because you are offended? Sounds like ur judging skills are top notch!

Meanwhile Biden goes swimming all the time and bragged about being able to do 100 pushups but dodged the draft 3 times because of asthma! Thats 2 more draft dodges than Bone Spurs!
 
Her Instagram account was banned briefly. They have not said why the account was banned, only that it was in error. Anything beyond that is speculation at best.
Speculation at best? Bullshit! The people being targeted on social media are people who are posting things that are derogatory to Democrats and their policies. These social media conglomerates after banning someone and it gets major coverage what they did they then claim it was done in "error". Wake up and smell the coffee.
 
Back
Top Bottom