• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Moscow Acknowledges Mysterious Rocket Explosion Involved Nuclear Workers

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
112,402
Reaction score
102,556
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Moscow Acknowledges Mysterious Rocket Explosion Involved Nuclear Workers

We know that the Russians are working on some kind of nuclear propulsion for a cruise missile.


Area of the nuclear accident in the northern White Sea.


As always, Russia is hiding details of a nuclear accident. This incident occurred at a Russian Navy proving ground near the village of Nyonoksa on the White Sea. It seems the Russians were again testing a Buresvestnik (SSC-X-9 Skyfall) nuclear-powered cruise missile. The missile has failed on each of its five previous tests.

Related: U.S.-Based Experts Suspect Russia Blast Involved Nuclear-Powered Missile
 
Aaaaand, progress goes "boom".
 
Nuclear powered, but not nuclear warhead? What are the latest radiation numbers?
 
Nuclear powered, but not nuclear warhead? What are the latest radiation numbers?

According to Greenpeace, the radiation numbers in Severodvinsk rose to 6x normal levels, but this is still below a dangerous situation and they returned to normal after 24 hours. The Buresvestnik (Petrel) is actually bi-propelled. The initial phase is a solid fuel turbo-jet, which then switches over to being powered by the heat decay of nuclear isotopes. Getting such a device to work in a missile traveling at super/hypersonic speed is vastly different than a successful bench test in a research lab. The Russians state that such a cruise missile could stay aloft indefinitely, which may or may not be true, but I fail to see the utility in this. Either you are going to strike something or you are not. US Navy surface ships and submarines enable any location on the globe to be targeted and struck by cruise missiles.
 

Why do Russians love to play with radioactivity?

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…