- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 3,851
- Reaction score
- 1,170
- Location
- EUSSR
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
UAE is a fascist group: Unite Against Fascism - RationalWikiAbout 3,000 police officers were deployed to keep a group of 500 members of the right-wing English Defence League(aka, the so-called racists), or EDL, apart from a larger group of anti-racist protesters, including Unite Against Fascism.
Its joint secretaries are Weyman Bennett and Sabby Dhalu,[3] while Islamic fundamentalist Azad Ali is vice chair.[4] Unite Against Fascism also counts among its brass a number of members of a communist group, the Socialist Workers Party.
Unquestionably violent behaviour
Some of their demonstrators have been arrested for violence after attacking members of right-leaning groups, or the police
Assault on woman at Tower Hamlets
At an EDL protest in Tower Hamlets on 3 September 2011 a bus carrying 44 EDL supporters was attacked by counter-protesters.[20] A video posted to YouTube shows the bus pulling away, revealing a woman lying on the ground behind it. A group of people then approach the woman, at which point the video becomes too blurry to make out what happens.[21] It was later revealed that the woman, named Joanne Dickens, was kicked in the head while lying on the ground and sustained a broken jaw
-- UAE is a fascist group: --
To be accurate, the only accusation they are fascist in your link comes from a Pat Condell quote.
Apart from that - everyone in the article seems to be calling everyone else a fascist - they all seem to be either left-wing fascists, right-wing fascists, centre ground fascists - even moderate fascists.
The word is losing all meaning by overuse and inaccurate use.
Fine, then they're communists.
Islamism represent a viciously totalitarian belief system that is anti-humanist to the core, micromanages people's lives down to the iota and is built upon lock-step conformity.
Seems to me that Britain has a problem on its hands, especially in terms of the lack of intellectual clarity necessary to distinguish between opposition to totalitarianism and racism. The waters are so muddied that it now seems nigh on impossible to find the language necessary to oppose this totalitarian belief system at all.
So basically the American right wing social conservative ideology..
Ah but don't you read the latest from America?
Our totalitarians run amok, our fascists breed in vast numbers and we're all in lockstep on our way to Mecca.
The UK is about to become a muslim state. 3% of the population has cowed the other 97% and our Queen wears a burka.
Ah but don't you read the latest from America?
Our totalitarians run amok, our fascists breed in vast numbers and we're all in lockstep on our way to Mecca.
The UK is about to become a muslim state. 3% of the population has cowed the other 97% and our Queen wears a burka.
I don't know, it seemed the ADL became the main boogie man after the Lee Rigby murder.
there does seem an unwillingness to actually deal with the issue as it exists, akin to the eggshell walking that followed the street grooming scandals.
The "ADL?" The anti-defamation league?
What did they have to do with Lee Rigby? The bogeymen were islamist fanatics who were willing to attack soldiers with meat cleavers. Don't know where you get your news from..
Again, not sure where you get your news from - there was quite a bit of discussion in the UK. Same with the grooming scandals which I think you're trying to suggest are a muslim on white girl thing?
Shame it ruins the narrative but paedophilia is the primary problem as evidenced by the fact Pakistani Paedophile gangs are not just targeting white girls. They are (shock horror) also targeting brown girls too.
Recent evidence suggests these paedophile muslim grooming gangs are also targeting muslim girls too - where does it leave right wing American outrage at "lockstep Britain bowing down and appeasing the muslim invader" who will rape only white wimmin and chilluns?
Sorry, I meant the EDL
Maybe you're knee jerk nationalism is making you respond in a silly manner to a simple typo?
-- Dude, I'm not watching a 29 minute video.
But a few questions--
In actual fact, you made a wrongful assertion about the EDL being the "bogeymen" but maybe it's better to attack me for nationalism instead because you have nothing to respond to in proper debate.
By the way, you can search my record on the EDL. I have not condemned them ever on this forum, to me they represent (sometimes) a legitimate concern around integration in this country.
That about sums it up.
You'd rather repeat American accusations grounded only in the facts provided by one-sided reportage from dodgy websites than watch an investigative video with witnesses and facts.
Watch the f****n video. Read the f****n links. These gangs are paedophile gangs first and foremost. You may prefer a narrative that they are racist, on some kind of mission etc but they are paedophiles and should be treated as such.
-- Again, I have no obligation to watch a 29 minute video when you can easily offer something more concise. --
Ah but don't you read the latest from America?
Our totalitarians run amok, our fascists breed in vast numbers and we're all in lockstep on our way to Mecca.
The UK is about to become a muslim state. 3% of the population has cowed the other 97% and our Queen wears a burka.
Our Queen wears a burka?
You're living in cloud-cuckoo land. Britain is in no way about to become a muslim state. It's increasingly secular, which means less Christian, which I think you are mistaking for Islamisation.
1) No, I fully stand by that assertion, and recall "higgens" making similar coments at the time
2) I did respond. My response was that it's silly to make a bunch of hay over an obvious typo
I don't like the EDL either. But what does that have to do with anything I posted here? My issue was the EDL becoming the boogeyman after islamic extremists just decapitated some random guy in the streets and that people were trying to equivocate that with some ****s tossing sausages at people
Indeed it does, because asking to watch a 29 minute video is rather unreasonable, when you can offer more specific citations.
1)What is with your need to turn every discussion into some pointless, nationalist pissing match?
2) I get my news from outlets like Al-jazeera and the BBC
3) Again, I have no obligation to watch a 29 minute video when you can easily offer something more concise
lol, why not just offer something more concise or address the questions
Our Queen wears a burka?
You're living in cloud-cuckoo land. Britain is in no way about to become a muslim state. It's increasingly secular, which means less Christian, which I think you are mistaking for Islamisation.
They have stopped telling us that muslims will be the population majority by 2020 but there's lots of idiocy still apparent.
)
Which posters would these be, eh?
I joined in 2007 and have seen you thank many of those such posters in all this time. Check your own thanks or likes history.
Nuff said. Rumour and speculation over facts and proper investigation every time with you guys.
Thread over, goodbye.