So intelligence agencies should run sources? We're getting somewhere. Should they keep those sources absolutely private?
I don't know, let's find out. A bit of metadata, address, buying habits, phone number, and then SSN on top of it? I'll take it. I mean....what good is it gonna do me, right? So you should be totally comfortable posting all that information right here online.
No. Do you think that's what they do? You seem to be very....let's say "new" to the intelligence process.
Um...why do you think you're the same as NSA? That's what I'm asking. What oversight do you have? That's the question.
I've signed many consent to monitor forms in my life...But never to you. So why should I?
Like i said earlier. More openess to FISA courts. More regulation.
Oh honey, I've worked for the NSA. I know exactly what metadata is and how it's used. I don't know why you think giving it to you and anyone reading this would be the same as giving it to the NSA. Is giving my social security number to you the same as giving it to the IRS or my bank?
Thank you for acknowledging that metadata can contain significant personal information that you wouldn't want shared with strangers.
Thank you for acknowledging that metadata can contain significant personal information that you wouldn't want shared with strangers.
...what? What is that in answer to? What regulation? Any? Make sure Meade is up to fire code? Add more anti mold regulation to the tunnel at Kunia?
It's very opens to FISA courts.
More openness. Restrict their powers. You think the NSA just got these powers out of the blue? This is what I am in favor of: Chairman of key House committee agrees to proceed with NSA reform bill | World news | theguardian.com Believe its a great start. But unfortunatley I believe the bill died.
Can
You
Read
A
Article
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?