I don't know where you get your information from, but it is highly flawed and not factual with any type of reason.
It is proven fact that Strzok and paige changed testimony.
As a self-proclaimed adherent to Hanlon’s Razor, I once cynically viewed the frenzied focus on FBI actions during the 2016 Russian election-meddling investigation as partisan and overwrought. Hanlon’s Razor suggests that we never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by...
www.washingtonexaminer.com
In fact the FBI lost the original 302 that was taken by the original investigators that stated they did not think that flynn lied and
wanted to close the case.
The attorneys prosecuting former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn were forced to admit in a Tuesday letter to Flynn’s legal defense that the notes which formed the official docum…
www.nationalreview.com
The attorneys prosecuting former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn were forced to admit in a Tuesday letter to Flynn’s legal defense that the notes which formed the official document describing Flynn’s January 2017 interview were not written by agent Peter Strzok, as they’ve maintained throughout the case.
“We were informed that the notes we had identified as Peter Strzok’s, were actually the other agent’s notes (
see Surreply, Exhibit 1), and what we had identified as the other agent’s notes were in fact Strzok’s notes (
see Surreply, Exibit 2)” the letter to Flynn’s lawyer Sidney Powell reads.
“Those changes added an unequivocal statement that ‘Flynn stated he did not’ — in response to whether Mr. Flynn had asked Kislyak to vote in a certain manner or slow down the UN vote [on sanctions],” Powell wrote. “This is a deceptive manipulation because, as the notes of the agents show, Mr. Flynn was not even sure he had spoken to Russia/Kislyak on the issue. He had talked to dozens of countries.”
“That question and answer does not appear in the notes, yet it was made into a criminal offense,” Powell argued in the motion. “The draft also shows that the agents moved a sentence to make it seem to be an answer to a question it was not.”
Released text messages between Strzok and Page show that on February 10, the same day that news broke from “senior intelligence officials” that Flynn had discussed sanctions with Kislyak, Strozk told Page that he had updated the 302 form to reflect her edits.
“I made your edits, and sent them to Joe. I also emailed you an updated 302 . . . hopefully it doesn’t need much more editing. I will polish it this weekend, and have it ready for Monday. I really appreciate your times and edits,” Strzok said.
why can't you just admit that the these two FBI agents corrupted the entire process.
I have seen judges throw out cases for less than this. Judges have thrown out trial cases because 1 officer didn't sign an evidence sheet.
Judges have declared mistrials and thrown cases out because an agent touched something he wasn't supposed to.
The fact that we have 2 FBI agents changing testimony the FBI "lost" the original 302 form and original notes taken by the original detectives clearly shows criminal misconduct.