more bias in the media...... (1 Viewer)

[ProudAmerican]

the look on the face of the libs after reading this would be priceless to see.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,198177,00.html

Wall Street started the day lower after Iran warned it would curtail distribution if Western nations punish or attack the country over its nuclear arms program, unnerving a market already concerned that severe hurricane activity could devastate Gulf Coast refineries again this summer. A barrel of light crude gained 62 cents to $72.60 on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

I fault Fox news here for assuming Irans nuclear program is for arms. IMO, they should have said "suspected nuclear arms program"

while I believe thats exactly what it is....we dont yet have proof. I think taking recent history into account about how we probably got a lot of things wrong in Iraq....assuming anything about Iran before proof is found is dangerous.

 

[Billo_Really]

The biggest threat to our economy is Bush taking a $2 billion surplus and going on a spending spree that cannot be paid off without the help of other nations and our childrens' childrens' children!

 

[BigDog]

I think taking recent history into account about how we probably got a lot of things wrong in Iraq....assuming anything about Iran before proof is found is dangerous.

Finally, something we argue on. :lol:

 

[ProudAmerican]

Finally, something we argue on. :lol:

its called bi-partisan thinking. using your brain and not towing the party line. you should try it sometime.

 

[ProudAmerican]

The biggest threat to our economy is Bush taking a $2 billion surplus and going on a spending spree that cannot be paid off without the help of other nations and our childrens' childrens' children!

start a thread on it.

as long as you are in this thread, try to stay on topic and not hijack it.

 

[BigDog]

its called bi-partisan thinking. using your brain and not towing the party line. you should try it sometime.

I don't have a party to be for.

 

[ProudAmerican]

I don't have a party to be for.

If I had a nickel for everytime a liberal said that, Id be a rich man.

 

[::Major_Baker::]

how was my face supposed to change?

 

[::Major_Baker::]

If I had a nickel for everytime a liberal said that, Id be a rich man.

And your party? where the hell did that vanish to?

 

[BigDog]

If I had a nickel for everytime a liberal said that, Id be a rich man.

I didn't say I wasn't a liberal. I said I don't belong to a party. Therefore, I can't be partisan. Now, can you debate man to man and refrain from easy, and inaccurate answers that attempt to side step actual thought?

 

[ProudAmerican]

I didn't say I wasn't a liberal. I said I don't belong to a party. Therefore, I can't be partisan. Now, can you debate man to man and refrain from easy, and inaccurate answers that attempt to side step actual thought?

you have proven you are incapable of honest debate....so I guess my answer is no.

and in your mind, you may not belong to a party....but it is certainly clear which party you consistently make excuses for.

 

[BigDog]

you have proven you are incapable of honest debate....so I guess my answer is no.

and in your mind, you may not belong to a party....but it is certainly clear which party you consistently make excuses for.

I have made no excuses. It is not I who is apologising for Bush's lies. That would be you.

 

[Billo_Really]

Originally Posted by ProudAmerican
start a thread on it.

as long as you are in this thread, try to stay on topic and not hijack it.

And just what exactly is the topic? Economy? Iran? What...

 

[ProudAmerican]

And just what exactly is the topic? Economy? Iran? What...

if you cant figure that out for yourself, then I guess you have no business in the thread.

 

[BodiSatva]

Proud American

What the heck is that Big Dog talking about?
Did you apologize for Bush's lies?
Did you say that you were sorry because Bush did something wrong?

I wonder where some people get these ideas?

Originally Posted by BigDog
Now, can you debate man to man and refrain from easy, and inaccurate answers that attempt to side step actual thought?

Originally Posted by Proud American
you have proven you are incapable of honest debate....so I guess my answer is no.

YOU MEAN...."I am capable of having a debate man to man, it is YOU that has proven to be incapable of an honest debate...so with YOU this task will not be possible"

THAT , is serious Ownage.