- Joined
- Jun 22, 2019
- Messages
- 14,987
- Reaction score
- 12,379
- Location
- Oregon's High Desert
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
What do you call the slaughter of 60,000,000 unborn children?
I call it none of your business... and they are not children. They are embryo's and fetus's.
Who or what gave you the authority to make a statement like this? Was it something you gleaned from the liberal media? ... or just a product of your own delusional influences?
And when did the "Very Conservative" start yelling for Mama State to come and shut down individual liberties?
What sort of strawman is it you are trying to build here? And how does this even relate to the topic in question?Never. They never did that and never will. You want to see "shut down" individual liberties? Perhaps you should go live in China for a few months --- that might reset your false expectation.
What sort of strawman is it you are trying to build here? And how does this even relate to the topic in question?
As far as abortion goes, the so called "Conservative" camp of Pro Lifers are insanely Statist and altruistic.
Exactly. You, my friend, are a Statist.Golly, is it opposite day or something? Statist: relating to or characteristic of a political system in which the state has substantial centralized control over social and economic affairs.
Does that sound like a constitutional representative republic or a socialist philosophy?
What? :lamoIt's a direct response to your post, and it's very relevant. You brought up individual liberties so if it is off topic it's the discussion that you started.... so yeah, direct that question back at yourself.
Bro, who are you even talking to? :lamoSo China is a no go? That's what I thought. Go back to your free, open capitalistic society built from the ground up by conservatives. What does this mean? Christians created the most free and open society in the history of the world. And you are calling them "statists"?! This is liberal paradox #022.
Cute graph. I am uninterested in statistics and think the main reason people of today are so dumb is because they have an unhealthy obsession with statistics and trust statistics more than they trust reality itself.
Who or what gave you the authority to make a statement like this? Was it something you gleaned from the liberal media? ... or just a product of your own delusional influences?
Never. They never did that and never will.
Then you are pro-choice! Welcome to the enlightened, fair and kind side of the debate... congratulations!
How so?
Who or what gave you the authority to make a statement like this? Was it something you gleaned from the liberal media? ... or just a product of your own delusional influences?
Never. They(conservatives) never did that (ask the government of take liberties away) and never will. You want to see "shut down" individual liberties? Perhaps you should go live in China for a few months --- that might reset your false expectation.
Exactly. You, my friend, are a Statist.
What? :lamo
Bro, who are you even talking to? :lamo
Cute graph. I am uninterested in statistics and think the main reason people of today are so dumb is because they have an unhealthy obsession with statistics and trust statistics more than they trust reality itself.
Sure... you stop women from right to privacy and we come and take you guns, your freedom of religion, etc.
Sure, you want the the State to step in and regulate the market service of abortion simply because you personally do not like abortions. You rely on the State to step in and wipe out the elements of society you personally dislike and keep those things you do like legal.I like how you didn't answer my question. LOL lots of fluff in that post. Typical! :lamo
Can you explain why you think I'm a statist?
First of all, I am not a Liberal and secondly I do not even like abortion, but since I am not Statist and since I understand economics, I do not want to impose my personal preferences on others and do not like the State to step in and regulate the market. It is very simple.Unhealthy obsession? I think dealing with the facts is a healthy obsession. Obviously, when you deal in facts, liberals don't like it one bit. Hence, your response is no surprise. So it sounds like, based on your reply, you would prefer to remain ignorant to the facts of abortion? LOL why am I not surprised? :lamo
If you actually read my posts instead of jerking off to the emblem of your prefered Statist Party, you would see that I very clearly stated that it is up to each and every adult indivudal themselves to take responsibility for their own actions - Want sex, but no pregnancy? Then shag with protection.You do realize that pregnancy is a natural reproductive process that has occurred for thousands of years, right? As in women have estrogen for a reason? Women have ovaries for a reason? Let me provide the context that is clearly "lacking" from your entire understanding of the issue, if women didn't get pregnant, the death of the human race would follow quickly, right? Why are you raising cain over a natural life giving biological process?
No, it is death, but speaking of the matter in those terms is irrelevant since it only serves to drift the debate further and further away from a solution. My provided solutions are very clear and based on reality rather than on philosophical abstractions and love for the State.Do you really think it's better to kill unborn children? Oh wait... you are doing them a favor, right? And it's compassion, not death that's the real motive for abortion, right?
You are Statist and that is the only thing that is clear. As long as individuals are dressed and lights are turned on, you will advocate indivudal autonomy, but when clothes come off and lights go down, you cry for the State to help you. You demand the individual to sacrifice their own desires for "the common good of the collective" which not only makes you a Statist but also an altruist.EDIT: So you condemn the natural biological process of life, yet you rave about the un natural process of abortion?
Do I have all my ducks in a row now? Please, if one is out of place, tell me.
I like how you didn't answer my question. LOL lots of fluff in that post. Typical! :lamo
Can you explain why you think I'm a statist?
You do realize that pregnancy is a natural reproductive process that has occurred for thousands of years, right?
As in women have estrogen for a reason?
Women have ovaries for a reason?
Let me provide the context that is clearly "lacking" from your entire understanding of the issue, if women didn't get pregnant, the death of the human race would follow quickly, right?
Why are you raising cain over a natural life giving biological process?
Do you really think it's better to kill unborn children?
unborn children
Oh wait... you are doing them a favor, right?
And it's compassion, not death that's the real motive for abortion, right?
EDIT: So you condemn the natural biological process of life, yet you rave about the un natural process of abortion?
Do I have all my ducks in a row now? Please, if one is out of place, tell me.
First of all, I am not a Liberal and secondly I do not even like abortion, but since I am not Statist and since I understand economics, I do not want to impose my personal preferences on others and do not like the State to step in and regulate the market. It is very simple.
This is such a ridiculous post that it is kinda astounding that anybody would post it... I assume that you are young?
If a woman has an abortion or not it is none of your business. ... leave women alone. ... it is not his call if she keeps it our not.
That is rather cute since you are the one who - just like them - asks the government to step in and limit and the things in society that you personally do not like. A true conservative knows that a large problems that exist in society are spiritual rather than political and thus believe they should be handled on the local level and that they are to be solved organically rather than politically.I still group you in with the liberals because you share the same delusional persuasions.
Abortion is genocide, no matter how you cut the cake.
Since I'm a 12 year old
Double standard much? LOL
Yes, it must be "ridiculous" to save a life.
About how long has it been since you actually ingested truth? Because from here, it looks like you have some very serious delusions going on.
Next time try to bring actual context and facts to your post. Your one word answers and excessive use of emojis betray your confidence.
Since I'm a 12 year old I can relate to your excessive use of emojis and near-total lack of understanding. I think I've seen you around.
You ride the short bus, right?
Ridiculous? I think that word is reserved for people who prefer to kill (or defend the act) unborn, defenseless children.
Abortion is genocide, no matter how you cut the cake. The blood is on you hands.
Incorrect.
Definition of genocide
: the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group
Genocide | Definition of Genocide by Merriam-Webster
Abortion does not fit the definition in any way, shape or form.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?