• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Molding.

BrettNortje

Banned
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
793
Reaction score
22
Location
Cape Town
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist

Now that we understand what molding is, we can try to improve the functions of this type of thing.
 

To get more design out of the inside, we could observe the blowing of the inside of the 'bottle' or other materials to make it more easily shaped, by, instead of just blowing the inside, inserting a 'scalpel' to shape the inside of 'the thing.' that said, it will need one side open, so as to allow the 'shaping thing' inside the mold.

Or, we could try to close it once the object has been shaped, by allowing more mold material onto the outside of the materials to 'close the mold.'
 
Then, we could also try to shape the inside by using an expanding cylinder. this will make the 'shaping device' expand inside the object, and, then retract to the inside of the object again. this can be likened to a little camera that people swallow, except instead of taking pictures, it could disperse materials like a dandy lion or other plant, or 'retract the rods' to the center of the inserted device.
 

This obviously goes to liquid form before it gets hard. this means, of course, if you were to want it to 'dry quickly' you might want to 'flash treat' it with nitrogen to bond it quickly. or, we could use wax? these might be able to put the powder together quickly, then flash treat it with some heat, and the materials will be sewn together with the nitrogen in place or the wax melting off.
 

So, the main problem is; "Fewer knit lines are produced and a smaller amount of fiber-length degradation is noticeable when compared to injection molding." this means we need to make it more interwoven. this would mean that we need to simply turn it, like a steak? this would see the whole product have a once or twice over as if mixing batter, yes?

To do this, we need to only rotate the setting materials. this can be done by flipping the cast side ways or upside down and over. this will see the materials mix slightly in either direction, taking [a] materials over to materials territory, and materials over to [c] materials territory. in short, they will overlap like runners at the olympics holding hands.
 

The main problem here seems to be 'supporting the center barrier of the die.' this would allow for hollowed out things in this type of molding, of course. then, if we could support a 'center barrier,' we could shape the inside of the mold.

This means we need to simply have supports for it enveloped into it. this would see the hollowed out area supported, then the supports themselves become part of the design, allowing for much greater hollowed out potential.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaction_injection_molding said:
The disadvantages are slow cycle times, compared to injection molding, and expensive raw materials.

So, while i cannot see a problem with injection molding, reaction injection molding seems to be slow? injection molding makes multiple injection points to fill the whole inside of the mold with materials, while reaction injection molding;

Thermosetting polymers are used, which requires a curing reaction to occur within the mold.

This can be made easier by using a quicker cooling technique, which i will soon explain to you. if the mold is 'cooled,' say by liquid helium being spilled inside the mold, it will quickly sizzle down to nothing, while the inside of the mold will require mere seconds to cool down as it absorbs the 'ice.'

I remember seeing a red hot nickel ball dropped into a huge piece of ice. the two temperatures quickly reduced each other to room temperature, and, we could do that with this type of problem in reaction injection molding.
 
Or we could just let people who do it and know something about it get on with the job.
 

This is where materials are encased inside a mold to get the desired product or parts. if we were to observe that this is mainly a transfer of shapes of the mold, then we would understand properly.

If we were to observe that the shape of the mold needs to be perfect, as there is no suction or pull, but merely a closed thing that rotates for it to 'set,' then there would be a new desire for 'perfect outcomes.' these can come from holding the cast flat, so that it is 'lying down,' and using electricity to make the insides form quickly. electrocuting the materials will provide better bonding, as they are mixing electrons all over the place, leading to better electron bonds.
 

What did the materials do to deserve execution? It seems a little harsh.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…