- Joined
- Dec 14, 2005
- Messages
- 1,704
- Reaction score
- 10
- Location
- New Hampshire
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
There is basically but two political parties/ideologies that currently make up the American electoral spectrum--the Conservatives and the Liberals--of which one gets to represent the majority in Congress, and the seat to the presidency. There are of course, offshoot affiliations such as Ralph Nader’s Green House Gaseous Party and Bernie Sanders’s Socialist Party, but thank God those two and the remaining splinter groups have negligible to zero clout in exercising political policy.
Frankly, I do not believe that this so-called ‘moderate’, or ‘independent’, or ‘undecided’, or ‘middle roader’, or the ‘fence sitter’ populace is going to decide the outcome of any of our national elections. Anyone who is intelligent enough to exercise their right to vote, has already determined what ideology they favor (whether it be with the Republicans on strong kick arse defense, or with liberals for cutting and running).
World history tells us that there will always be wars rife with ethnic cleansing and or ethnic feuding.
I believe the ‘moderate’ stance on war to be similar to that of the liberal stance. While the moderate tends to be a dove/pacifist to war--so does the liberal. Both are apt to display a ‘Visualize World Peace’ bumper sticker in hopes of garnering support or sympathy from a resolve-minded hawkish Conservative that they hope gets hoodwinked into falling prey to their empty and surreal bleeding heart rhetoric.
Moderates and Liberals alike tend to placate the ramifications of war by insisting on negotiations, peace accords, exercising détente policy, quid pro quo adaptations, and appeasement propositions. Could someone please tell me of how it had worked when using any of the aforementioned plans for peace and tranquility in our lifetime?
Didn’t Jimmy Carter get a Nobel Peace Prize for his symbolic holding of hands with leaders of Egypt and Israel as a notion that peace had finally been reached in that area? What a joke! How are the Muslim and Israeli people getting along today?
How did negotiating or attempting to negotiate with Hitler, Mussolini, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Kruschev, Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Bin Laden, Saddam, Allatoyah, or any other modern day despot help to ease tensions, or help to bring about peace in any recognizable manner?
Frankly, I do not believe that this so-called ‘moderate’, or ‘independent’, or ‘undecided’, or ‘middle roader’, or the ‘fence sitter’ populace is going to decide the outcome of any of our national elections. Anyone who is intelligent enough to exercise their right to vote, has already determined what ideology they favor (whether it be with the Republicans on strong kick arse defense, or with liberals for cutting and running).
World history tells us that there will always be wars rife with ethnic cleansing and or ethnic feuding.
I believe the ‘moderate’ stance on war to be similar to that of the liberal stance. While the moderate tends to be a dove/pacifist to war--so does the liberal. Both are apt to display a ‘Visualize World Peace’ bumper sticker in hopes of garnering support or sympathy from a resolve-minded hawkish Conservative that they hope gets hoodwinked into falling prey to their empty and surreal bleeding heart rhetoric.
Moderates and Liberals alike tend to placate the ramifications of war by insisting on negotiations, peace accords, exercising détente policy, quid pro quo adaptations, and appeasement propositions. Could someone please tell me of how it had worked when using any of the aforementioned plans for peace and tranquility in our lifetime?
Didn’t Jimmy Carter get a Nobel Peace Prize for his symbolic holding of hands with leaders of Egypt and Israel as a notion that peace had finally been reached in that area? What a joke! How are the Muslim and Israeli people getting along today?
How did negotiating or attempting to negotiate with Hitler, Mussolini, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Kruschev, Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Bin Laden, Saddam, Allatoyah, or any other modern day despot help to ease tensions, or help to bring about peace in any recognizable manner?