• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mississippi: Most Illegals in ICE Raids Stole American Identities

Fledermaus said:
Gibberish. Please try again.

How is paying people who never worked related to at-will employment?
Click to expand...

This no requirement to work in an at-will employment State.

Since the general welfare is a State function, regardless, solving for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment also solves simple poverty. These types of market friendly programs pay for themselves with a positive multiplier of Two or more.
 
danielpalos said:
This no requirement to work in an at-will employment State.

Since the general welfare is a State function, regardless, solving for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment also solves simple poverty. These types of market friendly programs pay for themselves with a positive multiplier of Two or more.
Click to expand...

More claims. No support.

There is a requirement to work if you wish to draw unemployment benefits.

This has nothing to do with "at-will".
 
Fledermaus said:
More claims. No support.

There is a requirement to work if you wish to draw unemployment benefits.

This has nothing to do with "at-will".
Click to expand...

lol. Only something repugnant to general State labor code law may allege to do that and should be "nothing but Repealed".
 
Fledermaus said:
WTF are you babbling about now?

Repeal what?

Why?

To what purpose?
Click to expand...

Simple concepts only right wingers find too difficult to comprehend. legal coincidence or legal conspiracy.

The purpose as always, is a solution not just right wing appeals to ignorance and bigotry.

Solving simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States. Unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, could have solved simple poverty Yesterday, but for the "social horror for the right wing that the Poor" may benefit under our form of Capitalism.
 
danielpalos said:
Simple concepts only right wingers find too difficult to comprehend. legal coincidence or legal conspiracy.

The purpose as always, is a solution not just right wing appeals to ignorance and bigotry.

Solving simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States. Unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, could have solved simple poverty Yesterday, but for the "social horror for the right wing that the Poor" may benefit under our form of Capitalism.
Click to expand...

Rote regurgitation of previous rants.

Unemployment benefits are for those who were previously employed and have been terminated for through no fault of their own.

Period.

It has nothing to do with "at-will" status.
 
Fledermaus said:
Rote regurgitation of previous rants.

Unemployment benefits are for those who were previously employed and have been terminated for through no fault of their own.

Period.

It has nothing to do with "at-will" status.
Click to expand...

You simply appeal to ignorance in any conflict of laws.
 
danielpalos said:
You simply appeal to ignorance in any conflict of laws.
Click to expand...

What conflict?

Unemployment benefits are for those who were previously employed and have been terminated for through no fault of their own.

Period.

It has nothing to do with "at-will" status.

Where is the conflict?
 
Fledermaus said:
What conflict?

Unemployment benefits are for those who were previously employed and have been terminated for through no fault of their own.

Period.

It has nothing to do with "at-will" status.

Where is the conflict?
Click to expand...

General State labor code law at 2922 says employment is at the will of either party with no legal or moral prejudice for any State administered benefits, in any conflict of laws.

There is no State statute enacted by the legislature which says differently.
 
danielpalos said:
General State labor code law at 2922 says employment is at the will of either party with no legal or moral prejudice for any State administered benefits, in any conflict of laws.

There is no State statute enacted by the legislature which says differently.
Click to expand...

So what?

Unemployment benefits have nothing to do with at-will employment.
 
Irredentist said:
Of course, Republicans will ignore the cheapest and most logical solution to this problem, which is simply to grant these migrants work visas. But I guess expensive boondoggles like border walls and mass arrests and deportations are more appealing to those who simply want to "feel" that something is being done, rather than actually solve the problem.
Click to expand...

Cheapest possible employees with the absolutely lowest wages for blue collar employees is the goal of the Democratic Party on behalf of their corporate super rich masters.
 
Fledermaus said:
So what?

Unemployment benefits have nothing to do with at-will employment.
Click to expand...

You still appeal to nothing but ignorance. California general State labor code law at 2922 defines the employment relationship in our State.

For-cause requirements must require for-cause employment; which, EDD must prove to deny or disparage benefits for employment at-will due to that State labor code law which defines the requirements required.
 
danielpalos said:
You still appeal to nothing but ignorance. California general State labor code law at 2922 defines the employment relationship in our State.

For-cause requirements must require for-cause employment; which, EDD must prove to deny or disparage benefits for employment at-will due to that State labor code law which defines the requirements required.
Click to expand...

Word salad.

Unemployment benefits have nothing to do with "at-will" employment.
 
Fledermaus said:
Word salad.

Unemployment benefits have nothing to do with "at-will" employment.
Click to expand...

It doesn't say that in the labor code, the only requirement is notice at the will of either party.

And, you have no State statute enacted by our legislators, assembled, which says differently.
 
danielpalos said:
Employment relationships are established by general State labor code statute law at 2922, enacted by our legislature, assembled.

You are claiming EDD can create statute law, or court rules as an, "other authority"?
Click to expand...

Did you find anything in the link pertaining to "at-will"?
 
Fledermaus said:
So... You have NOTHING tying "at-will" employment to unemployment.
Click to expand...

Only if you appeal to ignorance of the whole concept of employment at the will of either party. There is no requirement to be employed or have been employed on an at-will basis for unemployment benefits in an at-will employment State. Since employment is at-will, unemployment should also be at-will.
 
The right wing has no valid arguments and prefers to stall at the expense of the Poor in winter.

Why does the right wing have a problem with unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom