Gibberish
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2005
- Messages
- 6,339
- Reaction score
- 1,269
- Location
- San Diego, CA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
I'm currently about half way through the book: Misquoting Jesus by Bart Ehrman. For those of you who have not heard of it you can find the description at the end of this post.
I agree with the concept and still cannot grasp how followers of the bible see this book as basically passed down by God. Now the book itself has great stories on moral issues and I think overall it teaches good lessons. Though it should be taken in as such, a collection of stories.
What are your thoughts on the bible? It is proven to be written by many men over a course of hundereds of years and most of the authors were seperated by the actual person in the story by three or four degrees. So where is the believe that the book in infallible?
I agree with the concept and still cannot grasp how followers of the bible see this book as basically passed down by God. Now the book itself has great stories on moral issues and I think overall it teaches good lessons. Though it should be taken in as such, a collection of stories.
What are your thoughts on the bible? It is proven to be written by many men over a course of hundereds of years and most of the authors were seperated by the actual person in the story by three or four degrees. So where is the believe that the book in infallible?
The popular perception of the Bible as a divinely perfect book receives scant support from Ehrman, who sees in Holy Writ ample evidence of human fallibility and ecclesiastical politics. Though himself schooled in evangelical literalism, Ehrman has come to regard his earlier faith in the inerrant inspiration of the Bible as misguided, given that the original texts have disappeared and that the extant texts available do not agree with one another. Most of the textual discrepancies, Ehrman acknowledges, matter little, but some do profoundly affect religious doctrine. To assess how ignorant or theologically manipulative scribes may have changed the biblical text, modern scholars have developed procedures for comparing diverging texts. And in language accessible to nonspecialists, Ehrman explains these procedures and their results. He further explains why textual criticism has frequently sparked intense controversy, especially among scripture-alone Protestants. In discounting not only the authenticity of existing manuscripts but also the inspiration of the original writers, Ehrman will deeply divide his readers. Although he addresses a popular audience, he undercuts the very religious attitudes that have made the Bible a popular book. Still, this is a useful overview for biblical history collections. Bryce Christensen
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved