• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Minuteman Volunteers Build Fence in CA

Re: The reaction begins

Little-Acorn said:
I kind of prefer the fence design the Minutemen have suggested.

bf_display.jpg


The cameras and electronic gizmos are sexy, but can be taken out fairly easily. There's no substitute for manned patrols, even with a good fence.

The purpose of the fence is not to stop all illegal crossings. It would be great if that were possible, but it's not. The purpose is to cut crossings way down, and slow down the ones who have the resources to get through it anyway, enough that the Border Patrol can get there and take care of them.

The fence our guys built on April 29 was obviously not intended to stop all crossing attempts - it was pretty paltry. Its purpose was to publicize the fact that there are a lot of people willing to put time and effot into building SOMETHING to keep illegal crossers out.

Donations sent for the Minuteman fence project, are spent on the one in the design above, not quickie jobs thrown together in a weekend like the April 29 one. The people who showed up to build that one, paid for it themselves.

Three things are needed to secure our souther border:

1.) Build a good fence.
2.) Man it adequately.
3.) Prosecute employers who hire illegal aliens.

That would work, but I prefer old-style stone walls. And not just on out southern borders, but also on our northern borders. We're at war and we can't just trust a line in the sand, if you take my meaning.
 
Re: The reaction begins

Little-Acorn said:
I kind of prefer the fence design the Minutemen have suggested.

bf_display.jpg


The cameras and electronic gizmos are sexy, but can be taken out fairly easily. There's no substitute for manned patrols, even with a good fence.

The purpose of the fence is not to stop all illegal crossings. It would be great if that were possible, but it's not. The purpose is to cut crossings way down, and slow down the ones who have the resources to get through it anyway, enough that the Border Patrol can get there and take care of them.

The fence our guys built on April 29 was obviously not intended to stop all crossing attempts - it was pretty paltry. Its purpose was to publicize the fact that there are a lot of people willing to put time and effot into building SOMETHING to keep illegal crossers out.

Donations sent for the Minuteman fence project, are spent on the one in the design above, not quickie jobs thrown together in a weekend like the April 29 one. The people who showed up to build that one, paid for it themselves.

Three things are needed to secure our souther border:

1.) Build a good fence.
2.) Man it adequately.
3.) Prosecute employers who hire illegal aliens.


Some of us prefer to live in a free country not behind prison walls.
 
Re: The reaction begins

disneydude said:
Yeah and racist is a term to people who use the type of derogatory language that you use constantly on these boards. Unless you have a complete lapse of memory take a look at your posts they are constantly filled with racist and other derogatory terms. At least the term "racist" fits in this situation.

Dude, cry me a river...:boohoo: :boohoo: :boohoo:



disneydude said:
Yes, Un-American. The term fits perfectly in this situation. Anyone in this country who feels that they are "entitled" simply due to birth do not understand that American values are not free. You are undeserving of American freedoms when you expect to get things simply because you were born. Freedoms are not entitlements. People who display behaviors unfitting of the principles that our freedoms are founded on are not deserving of those freedoms.
Who the hell are you to say what I deserve and don't deserve? You don't know my entire history, the things I've done for this country (though small differences they made) I've still done things to make my existence here better. Ever heard of the American Dream? To get rich or ie trying? At least I'm doing it legally.


disneydude said:
That is simply not true. You constantly spew your hatred out between whatever group you want to rag on - spics, wetbacks, fags...etc. etc. etc.
Remember that the people on these boards, unless they are new, know your history. You can't make a statement like this without being called out on it.
I only use wetbacks as a term for ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS! What about that do you not comprehend??? In fact, you're the racist by insinuating that all illegal immigrants are of the hispanic persuasion, and that's not true. You forgot about asians, russians, europeans, and arabs. They come here illegally too you know.
 
Re: The reaction begins

disneydude said:
Some of us prefer to live in a free country not behind prison walls.
No problem. As an American citizen, you are allowed to cross the border in a southerly direction, at any time. See, they aren't prison walls at all.

When do you plan to go?

:roll:

(Silly and vacuous non-argument disposed of)

.
 
Re: The reaction begins

disneydude said:
Some of us prefer to live in a free country not behind prison walls.

For us to be in a "FREE" country, as you keep repeating relentlessly. We'd have to be an anarchy; cuz then we'd be free to do whatever we damn well please. But that isn't so. We live in a gov't with limited liberties. Am I free to murder George Clooney? Yes, but I'd get punished for it. And in a "free" country, there are no punishments. Nothing is free, NOTHING!
 
Little-Acorn, nice plan where'd you find it? It'd definitely be better with at least one concrete barrier in it though, Israel's looks much more formidable. Patrols shouldn't be too much of a problem, after all the military are on the federal payroll anyway, better to have them out there than sitting around or playing wargames. I'm pretty sure the guys and gals over in Baghdad would prefer a border posting to what they're doing at the moment.
 
Re: The reaction begins

Donkey1499 said:
Dude, cry me a river...:boohoo: :boohoo: :boohoo:
No ones crying dude. Just thought that you should know that when you choose to use derogatory/racist language, you make YOURSELF look uneducated.



Donkey1499 said:
Ever heard of the American Dream? To get rich or die trying?
.

I'm sorry....I didn't get the civic lesson that the American Dream is to get rich or die trying....that sounds more like a Rap album to me. I didn't know that most Americans were that greedy.



Donkey1499 said:
I only use wetbacks as a term for ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS! What about that do you not comprehend??? In fact, you're the racist by insinuating that all illegal immigrants are of the hispanic persuasion, and that's not true. You forgot about asians, russians, europeans, and arabs. They come here illegally too you know.


Where did I ever insuate that all immigrants are of the hispanic persuasion. You are hallucinating.
 
Re: The reaction begins

disneydude said:
No ones crying dude. Just thought that you should know that when you choose to use derogatory/racist language, you make YOURSELF look uneducated.



.

I'm sorry....I didn't get the civic lesson that the American Dream is to get rich or die trying....that sounds more like a Rap album to me. I didn't know that most Americans were that greedy.






Where did I ever insuate that all immigrants are of the hispanic persuasion. You are hallucinating.

Ok, humor me. How is "wetback" a racist/derogatory term? Describe it in full detail.

Being a rap star is one of many American Dreams. Or are poor people supposed to keep dreaming about being poor? Screw that! I want duckets!


Your insinuation? That was just my hunch.
Uneducated? Yeah I just spent 12 years of my life drooling on my textbook and scratching my armpits continuously. Yup, and I'm so God damn stupid that even though I was accepted into a vo-ed for photography I just rub my camera across my belly and hope that Skittles pop out of the lens.
 
Donkey1499,

Ok, humor me. How is "wetback" a racist/derogatory term? Describe it in full detail.

Being a rap star is one of many American Dreams. Or are poor people supposed to keep dreaming about being poor? Screw that! I want duckets!


Your insinuation? That was just my hunch.
Uneducated? Yeah I just spent 12 years of my life drooling on my textbook and scratching my armpits continuously. Yup, and I'm so God damn stupid that even though I was accepted into a vo-ed for photography I just rub my camera across my belly and hope that Skittles pop out of the lens.

Very funny! :rofl


disneydude,

Where did I ever insuate that all immigrants are of the hispanic persuasion

When you said "wetback" is a racist/derogatory term. :mrgreen:
 
^
Your post defies logic.

You can't honestly be saying that you believe the term "wetback" is a positive term. The term is always thrown around as an insult and is derogatory.
Explain to me how the term is not a racist term and while you are at it, explain to me how saying it is a racist term implies that I am the one applying it towards Mexicans.

Again, your logic is completely illogical (or are you trying to play dumb).
 
disneydude said:
^
Your post defies logic.

You can't honestly be saying that you believe the term "wetback" is a positive term. The term is always thrown around as an insult and is derogatory.
Explain to me how the term is not a racist term and while you are at it, explain to me how saying it is a racist term implies that I am the one applying it towards Mexicans.

Again, your logic is completely illogical (or are you trying to play dumb).

Oh, and "racist" isn't a negative term? How 'bout this. I'm 3/4 White and 1/4 Native American. Ok, I'm a honkey-*** cracker! I'm also a dirty, son of a bitchin' Injun. There, I played on my own races. Happy now?

Are you a mexican? Cuz if not then WHY THE HELL ARE YOU OFFENDED OVER THE WORD"WETABACK"????????????????
 
One other thing, disneydude, that I forgot to put into a previous post.
How the hell does the use of a word qualify me as being "unedumakated"???

Oh yeah, I'm a red neck, NASCAR-lovin, chicken-eatin', hick, good-'ol-boy from the south that is a racist who doesn't like negroes, spics, japs, chinks, gooks, polocks, heebs, towel-heads, injuns, daegoes, micks, limeys, cubes, or anything else that ain't white. Whatever....:roll:
 
disneydude,

Your post defies logic.

Don't let me get started on yours Micky. ;)

You can't honestly be saying that you believe the term "wetback" is a positive term. The term is always thrown around as an insult and is derogatory.

Yeah I think so too I was just trying to help you understand Donkey's post.
 
Dammit! Wetback isn't derogatory when applied to criminals. Yes ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ARE CRIMINALS. And once you understand that, then you'll understand where I come from.
 
Donkey1499 said:
Oh, and "racist" isn't a negative term? How 'bout this. I'm 3/4 White and 1/4 Native American. Ok, I'm a honkey-*** cracker! I'm also a dirty, son of a bitchin' Injun. There, I played on my own races. Happy now?

Are you a mexican? Cuz if not then WHY THE HELL ARE YOU OFFENDED OVER THE WORD"WETABACK"????????????????


Whether I am Mexican or not is irrelevant. I can be offended by racist language using the term "******" even if I am not black, or "fag" even if I am not gay, or "Chink" or "Spic" or "Wetback" or "Injun" even when I am none of the above.

The terms are not used in a positive way, they are used in a degrogatory way to degrade people. They are used to by people to demean people that they feel are "lesser" than them.

Further, when these terms are used they do make you look less educated, because they are usually used by people who are less educated. You generally don't hear professionals throwing around these terms.


and BTW: If its important for you to really know: I am not Mexican or of any Latin descent.
 
disneydude said:
Whether I am Mexican or not is irrelevant. I can be offended by racist language using the term "******" even if I am not black, or "fag" even if I am not gay, or "Chink" or "Spic" or "Wetback" or "Injun" even when I am none of the above.

The terms are not used in a positive way, they are used in a degrogatory way to degrade people. They are used to by people to demean people that they feel are "lesser" than them.

Further, when these terms are used they do make you look less educated, because they are usually used by people who are less educated. You generally don't hear professionals throwing around these terms.


and BTW: If its important for you to really know: I am not Mexican or of any Latin descent.

I've got friends of just about every racial persuasion, and we use the slurs towards each other all the time. No harm done. A black guy called me "whitey" the other day, but I didn't get offended (he smiled when he said it, by the way). I'm never offended by racial slurs. Like I said before, race is only skin-deep. It's people like you that piss me off. Calling me a racist just because I use a word "Oh no donkey, that's not nice." Who gives a rat's ***? I don't, mainly because who would want to receive one? (LOL)
If you let a word that's not directed at you get to you, then I pity you.
 
Donkey1499 said:
I've got friends of just about every racial persuasion, and we use the slurs towards each other all the time. No harm done. A black guy called me "whitey" the other day, but I didn't get offended (he smiled when he said it, by the way). I'm never offended by racial slurs. Like I said before, race is only skin-deep. It's people like you that piss me off. Calling me a racist just because I use a word "Oh no donkey, that's not nice." Who gives a rat's ***? I don't, mainly because who would want to receive one? (LOL)
If you let a word that's not directed at you get to you, then I pity you.

Its one thing throwing around racial slurs between friends knowing that it is done in jest. It is quite another to use hate language when speaking derogatory about a class of people. Personally, you can call me any name in the book and I could give a rat's ***. I have been called many things by many people and I have thick enough skin that it doesn't bother me personally. However, I recognize that there are a lot of people who do care and I actually care more about hate language directed at them then I do about when it is directed at me. You can say that you are not "racist" but you use derogatory racist language. Maybe you aren't "racist" but when something "quacks like a duck.....its usually a duck".
 
disneydude said:
Its one thing throwing around racial slurs between friends knowing that it is done in jest. It is quite another to use hate language when speaking derogatory about a class of people. Personally, you can call me any name in the book and I could give a rat's ***. I have been called many things by many people and I have thick enough skin that it doesn't bother me personally. However, I recognize that there are a lot of people who do care and I actually care more about hate language directed at them then I do about when it is directed at me. You can say that you are not "racist" but you use derogatory racist language. Maybe you aren't "racist" but when something "quacks like a duck.....its usually a duck".

So, calling a group of ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS (who are criminals, by the way) a bunch of WETBACKS is racist and derogatory? That is just stupid. So calling legal immigrants "LEGAL" and calling illegal immigrants "WETBACKS" is in a way racist? That's stupid!
Whoa, I'm confusing myself with this BS.
Anywho, if immigrants come here LEGALLY, fine by me. They are normal people. But if they come here ILLEGALLY and mock my country and her rules, then I'm gonna call it how I see it. And those ILLEGAL immigrants are wetbacks. PERIOD.
 
What's the big deal?

Carlos Mencia uses the term on his show all the time. In fact I have have heard him use every colorful and 'derogatory' term to poke fun at every race and ethnicity the world over.

We really need to get away from this PC crap.

Slightly off topic, but if there were to ever be a Caucasian stand up comedian who made jokes the likes of which Chapelle and Mencia make, they would instantly be branded a racist. Double standards aren't helping much with race relations either.
 
SixStringHero said:
What's the big deal?

Carlos Mencia uses the term on his show all the time. In fact I have have heard him use every colorful and 'derogatory' term to poke fun at every race and ethnicity the world over.

We really need to get away from this PC crap.

Slightly off topic, but if there were to ever be a Caucasian stand up comedian who made jokes the likes of which Chapelle and Mencia make, they would instantly be branded a racist. Double standards aren't helping much with race relations either.

You sir, are correct! Political correctness and censorship has gone WAY too far. It's on the verge of stopping Free Speech, which is protected by the First Amendment, for those who didn't know.

George Carlin says racial slurs all the time.
 
Donkey1499 said:
Oh yeah, I'm a red neck, NASCAR-lovin, chicken-eatin', hick, good-'ol-boy from the south that is a racist who doesn't like negroes, spics, japs, chinks, gooks, polocks, heebs, towel-heads, injuns, daegoes, micks, limeys, cubes, or anything else that ain't white. Whatever....:roll:
Umm, we are. White that is. There's a lot of other ethnicities, and god knows this government will let just about anyone in, but we're still white in the majority. I don't mind being a Limey though, used the term myself in a recent post. Its better than getting scurvey.:mrgreen:
 
JamesRichards said:
Umm, we are. White that is. There's a lot of other ethnicities, and god knows this government will let just about anyone in, but we're still white in the majority. I don't mind being a Limey though, used the term myself in a recent post. Its better than getting scurvey.:mrgreen:

Well us "unedumakated" folk think of limies as fags in queer clothing. :roll:
 
Would you ladies mind ceasing your petulant little purse fight over naughty words, long enough to get a word in edgewise about the actual topic of this thread? How many of you even remember what it is?

The fence design I posted a diagram of, comes from a group who put up the weeneedafence.com website. They are affiliated with the Minutemen, and Chris Simcox has often referred to it in his various speeches on the immigration problem.

It's true that a solid concrete barrier added to the design, would look formidable, and this might have some positive efect in the effort to get people to stop crossing the border illegally. But it might also have bad effects - a concrete wall supports a ladder to get over it, better than concertina wire does. Plus, you can't see through it. One of the functions of the proposed fence, is to give the Border patrol time to get to the scene of people with enough resources to defeat the fence, before they can successfully cross. A concrete barrier would greatly hinder the BP finding them in time, and would give the crossers tons more time and conncealment to do their thing. So a concrete barrier would have both pluses and minuses. It's the designers' considered opinion that the design as it is, gets the job done the best way possible, of giving the BP time and ability to zero in on the few groups that are able to get through it.

Sure, parts of the little fence we put up near Campo, CA could be gotten through with a large pair of linesmen's pliers. That fence's goal was not the same as the posted design's. The little fence was put up to publicize the fact that people want the border secured , enough that they are willing to put in their own time, money, and sweat to help do it. The posted design will actually do the closing, effectively and for moderate cost.
 
Little-Acorn said:
Would you ladies mind ceasing your petulant little purse fight over naughty words, long enough to get a word in edgewise about the actual topic of this thread? How many of you even remember what it is?

The fence design I posted a diagram of, comes from a group who put up the weeneedafence.com website. They are affiliated with the Minutemen, and Chris Simcox has often referred to it in his various speeches on the immigration problem.

It's true that a solid concrete barrier added to the design, would look formidable, and this might have some positive efect in the effort to get people to stop crossing the border illegally. But it might also have bad effects - a concrete wall supports a ladder to get over it, better than concertina wire does. Plus, you can't see through it. One of the functions of the proposed fence, is to give the Border patrol time to get to the scene of people with enough resources to defeat the fence, before they can successfully cross. A concrete barrier would greatly hinder the BP finding them in time, and would give the crossers tons more time and conncealment to do their thing. So a concrete barrier would have both pluses and minuses. It's the designers' considered opinion that the design as it is, gets the job done the best way possible, of giving the BP time and ability to zero in on the few groups that are able to get through it.

Sure, parts of the little fence we put up near Campo, CA could be gotten through with a large pair of linesmen's pliers. That fence's goal was not the same as the posted design's. The little fence was put up to publicize the fact that people want the border secured , enough that they are willing to put in their own time, money, and sweat to help do it. The posted design will actually do the closing, effectively and for moderate cost.

The double fences and ditches would be better for functionality, but a wall just looks more intimidating. Especially with turrets (watchtowers) every 50-100 ft. And about the ladders, you just pour hot tar down those. And the others who actually manage to get over the fence should be herded up like cattle and have nets thrown over them. Then just automatically deport them to southern Mexico. They'll think twice before starting another trek on foot.
Also, a mine field should be placed on the Mexican/Canadian sides.
 
Back
Top Bottom