• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Minimum Wage Debate

Why-Wal-Mart-Cant-Pay-Employees-15-hour-The-Libertarian-Eye.jpg

Increasing the cost of labor in a time when people are already having trouble finding a job is catastrophic to those with the least amount of skills and experience (the poor). Big businesses can comply with the costs, but smaller companies in their early stages of production can not afford to do so, which creates oligopolies. Abolishing the minimum wage would give those without the ability to find work, gain experience and get their foot in the door to work their way up the ladder; as well as give the middle class a chance to become self employed and employ others. The business can choose to pay a person $0.00 by not hiring them, while preventing them from entering the labor market. Morally, the state should have no say in coming between two consenting individuals.

In order to argue for a raise in the minimum wage must show- that increases overtime have not effected teens entering the labor market, promotes competition, doesn't favor big business, and the state can morally use the threat of force to stop an employer for hiring an employee under the minimum wage.
 
I didn't check the numbers, but, if true, that's one powerful case. Thanks.
 
Bravo! Score one for common sense...
 
Of course a minimum wage will reduce the number of jobs probably mostly at the low end.
 
joG;bt2866 said:
Of course a minimum wage will reduce the number of jobs probably mostly at the low end.
Okay, let's say they reduce their employees by half. Using the same numbers, they'd still be out of business.
 
The root of this problem is because jobs like these were meant for teens to make a little bit of money. After careers, meant for adults, which payed real money, severely dropped, people lost the ability to make money. We need to create better paying jobs for the older people in our society instead of petty jobs meant for teens
 
MaggieD;bt2862 said:
I didn't check the numbers, but, if true, that's one powerful case. Thanks.

The numbers are wrong, badly wrong. For one, it assumes all employed work 8 hours a day every day. In fact, under 500k of Walmart's 1 million hourly employees work full time(34+ hours a week). An old saying: figures never lie, but liars figure. Including salaried employees, people already making over 10 an hour, and part employees in their calculations shows that either the graphic was made to mislead, or the person who made it is clueless.
 
Back
Top Bottom