- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Messages
- 104,278
- Reaction score
- 26,203
- Location
- Houston, in the great state of Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
We're not talking about intimidating judges to attack on Jewish people that are Muslims were expecting that they don't help illegal aliens evade immigration enforcement.Intimidating judges to attack an outgroup scapegoat is right out the Nazi playbook.
No, only Donald Trump is!She isn’t above the law.
So the law is the law only when it suits your agenda?
Well, THAT would have at least one benefit, it would give Righties a hard..........Yeah I agree Joe Biden should be prosecuted.
no such thing as "states rights". Rights are given to people. States have powers.The feds using state courthouses is a real disrespect to state's rights. It really interferes with their ability to function. If these guys know they're going to court, there's no reason why that can't arrest them before he gets there.
Laws and application of the law can be weaponized.
Laws do not execute themselves. It's people who execute the law, and right now, the law is being executed for the purposes of debasing certain classes of people. Everyone talks about resistance. This is what resistance looks like.
Martin Luther King disobeyed the law.
Rosa Parks disobeyed the law.
Were they wrong, or were the laws wrong?
And it would show that nobody's above the law but leftists think they're above the law. They think whatever moral ends they fabricate justifies the means.Well, THAT would have at least one benefit, it would give Righties a hard..........
that woud be the best outcome. I don't care about her as an individual - what happens or not - I don't think she's fit to be on the benchI predict that she won’t be returned to the bench.
Did you JUST say NOBODY is above the law? OMG, seriously? How disloyal are you? TRUMP is above the law. If you can't say so you are not a true Trumper.And it would show that nobody's above the law but leftists think they're above the law. They think whatever moral ends they fabricate justifies the means.
We're not talking about intimidating judges to attack on Jewish people that are Muslims were expecting that they don't help illegal aliens evade immigration enforcement.
It's call a word salad. Some people are very good at it.Wut?
Do you think it's wrong to deport illegal immigrants?
Of course not. Deport away - with due process.
Beyond that, a state judge isn't required to cooperate with gestapo efforts to apprehend them.
How about under Clinton or Kennedy? How far back in time do YOU want to go to deflect from the current conversation?Was it "gestapo efforts" under Obama and Biden?
Was it "gestapo efforts" under Obama and Biden?
This should be an interesting case. Clearly the prosecution is confident it has enough evidence to convict based on intent, so we'll see what they have when this goes to trial.
No, and that's fair to point out, and I'm surprised you actually made the reference - proof that they weren't actually as weak on enforcement as some conservatives argue. Biden was weak in his messaging, particularly coming out of the pandemic. He underestimated the pent-up demand for immigrant labor that was waiting to take advantage of the US economy's reopening. I won't deny that. But he did change course, and he proved it could be done without this ugly spectacle we're seeing now.
Why is arresting illegal immigrants "gestapo effort" under Trump, but not under Biden or Obama?
Because of the way that Trump is doing it, versus how Biden and Obama did.
You know, what you guys are cheering for. That's what we think is fascist.
No “bipartisan horse shit” to it.Yeah take that bipartisan horse shit somewhere else.
Sounds like a "they did it too" admission.Hasn't the left spent the last year saying that isn't a thing?
So long as it is done legally. Flores was in a court, the Chief Judge had informed the ICE agents that the court had not put in place a procedure for federal agents to enforce their warrants within his offices.Do you think it's wrong to deport illegal immigrants?
no such thing as "states rights". Rights are given to people. States have powers.
~~
the principle of federal supremacy, established by the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2), means that federal laws, including the Constitution and treaties, are the supreme law of the land and take precedence over conflicting state laws. This principle is foundational to American federalism, ensuring a unified national legal framework while allowing for state-level governance
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?