.....
I find this all very amusing and comical. And the Bundies should be commended for stirring up the nut cases and rounding them up for easy arrests. These militia folk are paranoid freaks (just read the link "possible drone strike"). The oathkeepers believe that they have been infiltrated. SO picture a group of paranoid people who distrust even their fellow soldiers. If the feds show up in force these nuts will be shooting their own first believing that they were infiltrators, but more likely they would all just **** their pants and give up. It really is pathetic seeing these full grown men sitting on top of a hill pretending to be look outs. I mean wtf are they going to to do?
The 1st amendment doesn't let you stop people on public roads, and so the 1st amendment doesn't apply.
The militia isn't operating under orders from a 'proper authority', they are conducting illegal activity, and so this 'militia' is little better than gang members.
Concerns growing about militia members at Bundy ranch - 8 News NOW
So like I said in other topics about this developing story, its gone beyond the unpaid fees for gazing on Federal land and turned into a question of whether or not we are going to allow an active insurgency to operate within this country.
Also, is it more ironic or sad that these folks who claim to want freedom are acting in exactly the manner of an authoritarian?
Seems like there has been a whole lot of demonizing going on.
Lets hope no one gets hurt.
Concerns growing about militia members at Bundy ranch - 8 News NOW
So like I said in other topics about this developing story, its gone beyond the unpaid fees for gazing on Federal land and turned into a question of whether or not we are going to allow an active insurgency to operate within this country.
Also, is it more ironic or sad that these folks who claim to want freedom are acting in exactly the manner of an authoritarian?
Nobody but the police or the owner of a property (and then only on his own property itself) has the right to do traffic stops or set up road blocks. Even the police does not force residents of an area to prove they are from there without a legal basis for such behavior and these armed clowns supporting Bundy have neither the legal right or the legal justification for their actions.
In all seriousness, if they stopped me, I would shoot them. I call on all residents so affected in that area to likewise take up arms and respell these 'militia'.
It would be interesting to see what these people would do if a driver simply drove right through the little road block.
Would they attempt a forced stop?
Would they simply stare impotently and be embarrassed?
What if the driver called 911 and said they felt threatened?
Stand your Ground anyone?
In all seriousness, if they stopped me, I would shoot them. I call on all residents so affected in that area to likewise take up arms and respell these 'militia'.
Concerns growing about militia members at Bundy ranch - 8 News NOW
So like I said in other topics about this developing story, its gone beyond the unpaid fees for gazing on Federal land and turned into a question of whether or not we are going to allow an active insurgency to operate within this country.
Also, is it more ironic or sad that these folks who claim to want freedom are acting in exactly the manner of an authoritarian?
Insurgency? :doh Who came armed first? Let me guess, you equate this to all pro-gun folks. Just because it uses the term 'militia' doesn't equate a legitimate US militia.
:failpail: on your known anti 2nd stance to paint all pro-gun as insurgence.
What?
All is not well in Militiaville. Oath Keepers » Blog Archive » Bundy Ranch Advisory for April 29, 2014
Incidentally the Oathkeepers are officially the militia group affiliated with the Bundy Ranch. Which hasnt pleased other militia groups. Apparently the militia community doesnt like that title so they no call themselves the patriot community.
"And that is true. And that is why Oath Keepers is being kicked in the teeth by people purporting to be pillars of the patriot community. "
Also it should be noted that the Bundies/Oathkeepers have named this the "The Bundy Ranch Revolution".
"This advisory will be an encapsulation of a much larger story with numerous feature or peak points to reveal in coming weeks and months. The Bundy Ranch Revolution against federal land management within the several States is positively huge. My comment to Stewart Rhodes regarding the gravity and significance of the Bundy stand is that it is a watershed moment in Twenty-first Century American history, and I am totally proud of Oath Keepers for jumping in with the Bundy family and their good neighbors."
They obviously want to make this a big deal and they go as far as calling it a revolution. They think that they are going to setup a military base in Nevada and through that base command a revolution. They believe that Americans will back them and pick up their firearms and rise against the government.
I find this all very amusing and comical. And the Bundies should be commended for stirring up the nut cases and rounding them up for easy arrests. These militia folk are paranoid freaks (just read the link "possible drone strike"). The oathkeepers believe that they have been infiltrated. SO picture a group of paranoid people who distrust even their fellow soldiers. If the feds show up in force these nuts will be shooting their own first believing that they were infiltrators, but more likely they would all just **** their pants and give up. It really is pathetic seeing these full grown men sitting on top of a hill pretending to be look outs. I mean wtf are they going to to do?
The 1st amendment doesn't let you stop people on public roads, and so the 1st amendment doesn't apply.
The militia isn't operating under orders from a 'proper authority', they are conducting illegal activity, and so this 'militia' is little better than gang members.
Insurgency? :doh Who came armed first? Let me guess, you equate this to all pro-gun folks. Just because it uses the term 'militia' doesn't equate a legitimate US militia.
Concerns growing about militia members at Bundy ranch - 8 News NOW
So like I said in other topics about this developing story, its gone beyond the unpaid fees for gazing on Federal land and turned into a question of whether or not we are going to allow an active insurgency to operate within this country.
Also, is it more ironic or sad that these folks who claim to want freedom are acting in exactly the manner of an authoritarian?
agreed, they have no right to stop anybody, and maybe this rancher is out of line, too. but we already KNOW what Feds tend to do to women and children, since waco and Ruby Ridge, so having LOTS of people watching them closely, is a GOOD thing.
Doesn't matter who camed armed first, there is NOTHING that gives these "militia" people the right to stop cars and ask for "proof" of where they live.
Has nothing to do with gun rights, etc, these people right now are overstepping their bounds.
just because it uses the term 'militia' doesn't equate a legitimate US militia
Actually, they are committing false imprisonment, which is highly illegal. My opinion is that the Feds should just move in and mop up.
Idiots like Weaver and Koresh, are different than Bundy.Sorry can't stand with anyone who supported a Waco or ruby ridge, what those people would have liked to do to my people would have been worse than death.
Sorry, did not mean Waco.
I would love to see them try. You think the feds are ready to fight more than a million people?
Sure, kill 'em all. :mrgreen:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?