• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Military Industrial Complex + CIA + dead Kennedy = constant war = $$$$$$$$

alanford

Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
59
Reaction score
9
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Let's start from an example and then continue...

Phebe Novakovic was working for the CIA and now she is working for the General Dynamics, the world’s fifth-largest defense contractor.
Background: Her father was a Serb who escaped to the US when he was 17 and started to work as a spy for America, for a foreign country = traitor.
She was married with a Michael Vickers in 1985, a former Green Beret who became the chief strategist for the CIA secret program that armed the mujahadeen as they fought against the Soviet Union’s in Afghanistan. Until this past spring Vickers was undersecretary of defense for intelligence, he retired from government service in April, 2015. As of December 2015, it was announced that he had been appointed to the BAE Systems, INC. Board of Directors (Civil and military aerospace, naval vessels, munitions, land warfare systems). Later, she married David H. Morrison, who was then a top staffer on the House defense appropriations subcommittee, a powerful figure in defense contracting. Later, he was working for the Boeing.

Beside such husbands, in 1992 she joined the White House Office of Management and Budget and rose quickly to become a top official overseeing the defense and intelligence budgets. Five years later she crossed the Potomac to work as a special assistant to William Cohen, then Defense secretary, and his deputy John Hamre. “She had an enormous amount of authority in the contracting world,” says Nicholas Chabraja, who was then General Dynamics’ CEO and became a mentor to Novakovic. So, she was working for the CIA and she was controlling the budget for the defense and then the private military industry employed her to work for them. Phebe got the position of a CEO in General Dynamics, they use her to get contracts. They produce warplanes, marine, missile, combat systems, etc. The last year she got from them $20M bucks, but they had the profit $3 or 3.5 billion from the war, from conflicts produced by the CIA, they sell tanks and other military systems, they are one of those private military/defense contractor like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, United technologies, etc. They are the one behind the war, not only oil/energy billionaires.

Private defense contractors are in Pentagon from 60-ties, already 50 years. They profited from the cold war and after that they supported Gulf War and Iraq war and all other wars. If there is the truth about 9/11 conspiracy, that it was organized by the CIA, to make a new war, then we can see who organized 9/11 (together with Saudi intelligence). People like Phebe have connections in the CIA, they produce conflicts and Phebe use the CIA to get contracts for the General Dynamics. All of them share money from the General Dynamics profit, and this company is not the only one, other companies function in the same way. Her husband was also working for the Boeing before he retired. She and her husband secure conflicts and contracts i.e. profit for the private military contractors. Boeing net profit in 2015: $5.17 billion. Boeing is the world’s second-largest defense contractor and General Dynamics is the world’s fifth-largest defense contractor.

Then I wanted to check who are the owners of these companies that profit from the war. For whom (beside for themselves) Phebe and the CIA produce profit? I supposed the owner are hidden behind many companies and they can have mixed investments, but surely they are billionaires and people like British Queen, they invest money in different companies and banks and companies and banks again invest money in the private military contractors.

Individual shareholders in Boeing are the top people in the company like the chairman James McNerney (in 5 years he got from Boeing $64M bucks, he owns 437,690 shares), Dennis Muilenburg, etc.
Institutional shareholders own 76% of the company and they are: Capital World Investors with 43,810,162 shares, Evercore Trust Company, N.A. with 43,049,097 shares, Vanguard Group, Inc. with 38,799,156 shares, Blackrock, Wells Fargo, UBS, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, etc.

I don't know how to remove attached image, I had to separate post into 3 parts, it was too long.
 

Attachments

  • 70dff8c0d19e8212a1c07ce78e69488e.jpg
    70dff8c0d19e8212a1c07ce78e69488e.jpg
    55.2 KB · Views: 53
Last edited:
As I thought: Capital World Investors is a privately owned investment manager. The firm manages equity and balanced mutual funds for its clients. The firm is based in Los Angeles, California. Capital World Investors operates as a subsidiary of Capital Research and Management Company (Martin A. Romo is the chairman). Capital Research and Management Company operates as a subsidiary of The Capital Group Companies, Inc (Timothy D. Armour is the chairman).
Capital Group is an American financial services company, it ranks among the world’s oldest and largest investment management organizations, with $1.39 trillion in assets under management. Founded in Los Angeles, California in 1931, it is privately held and has offices around the globe in the Americas, Asia, Australia and Europe. They own and Danish TDC 10%, Amazon 6.2%, Lockheed Martin 10%, 10% of Chinese battery producer BYD Co Ltd with 130 000 workers, 8% Telekom Austria Group, 10% Bayer AG, 5% Continental AG that produces parts for cars and mororcycles, 3% Deutche Bank, Siemens AG 3%, VW AG 4%, Ryanair 16.7%, Royal Dutch Shell 10%, Verizon 11.6%, etc.
Of course, we don’t know who are the clients of the Capital Group and its subsidiaries. It is the same case with Evercore Trust Company, N.A. (the CEO is Ciara Burnham) that is a national bank trust and a subsidiary of Evercore. Personal trust services are conducted through Evercore Trust Company, N.A, a national trust bank that, as of September 30, 2014, held US$42.1 billion in assets. We don’t know who are their clients.

United Technologies Corporation (UTC) is also a large military contractor, producing missile and aircraft systems. UTC has also investment from Vanguard, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Evercore Trust, Blackrock, etc. Their net profit in 2015: $7.6 billion.

Phebe and her General Dynamics are 87% owned by institutions. The biggest owner is Longview Asset Management with 33,326,872 shares (11%), formerly known as Longview Management Group, it is a Chicago-based investment fund managed by James A. Star. Other owners are Bank of America, Wells Fargo, BlackRock, Vanguard, Evercore, etc.

We can see that the same companies are repeating, they invest in more companies in the same industry… But again, if Bank of America owns General Dynamics shares, who owns Bank of America? Again the same institutions: the largest institutional stakeholders in Bank of America are asset managers. Bond giant BlackRock tops the list at 5.2% ownership, followed by The Vanguard Group at 4.9%, and the asset management arms of State Street, Fidelity, and T. Rowe Price at 4.3%, 2.5%, and 1.4%, respectively.


It is interesting also to see, on the example of Wikileaks, how much they are mixed with the CIA: The history of Bank of America dates back to October 17, 1904, when Amadeo Pietro Giannini founded the Bank of Italy in San Francisco. The Bank of Italy served the needs of many immigrants settling in the United States at that time, a service denied to them by the existing American banks who were typically discriminatory and often denied service to all but the wealthiest.
In November 2010, Forbes magazine published an interview with Assange in which he stated his intent to publish information which would turn a major U.S. bank “inside out”. In response to this announcement, Bank of America stock dropped 3.2%.
In December 2010, Bank of America announced that it would no longer service requests to transfer funds to WikiLeaks, stating that “Bank of America joins in the actions previously announced by MasterCard, PayPal, Visa Europe and others and will not process transactions of any type that we have reason to believe are intended for WikiLeaks.
In May 2014 many Iranian students in the U.S. and some American-Iranian citizens realized their accounts have been frozen by Bank of America.

Obviously the CIA and executives of the bank are working together, they make money together.

Individual owners of Bank of America: Turning to inside investors, far and away the largest inside owner is Thomas Montag, Bank of America’s chief operating officer, who received the equivalent of more than 1.5 million shares as a part of B of A’s Merrill Lynch acquisition. The second largest holder is chief financial officer Bruce Thompson with 688,383 shares. And in third place is chief executive officer and recently elected board chairman Brian Moynihan with just under 600,000 shares.

All of them are part of the CIA also, they are not just collaborators, they are making money together.


Let’s see more about the military industry, they are so much interconnected with the CIA that they can kill even the president of the USA.
 
The military–industrial complex (MIC) is an informal alliance between the US military and the defense industry which supplies it, seen together as a vested interest which influences public policy. The term is most often used in reference to the system behind the military of the United States, MIC is mentioned in the farewell address of President Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 17, 1961.



It is interesting to see how many videos at the YouTube about Kennedy and Eisenhower are uploaded and linked each to others, to produce confusion and to discredit Kennedy and Eisenhower with the videos about conspiracy and aliens. It means that the CIA took care to publish it in that way that Kennedy and Eisenhower are connected with “conspiracy theories”, even with the aliens, for me, it means that the secret service is responsible for the death of Kennedy.

It is the same when they publish photo of Einstein, they do it always with a tongue, it means he was a scientist, but he was also a communist and spied by the FBI, therefore, they represent him as a crazy scientist. They can’t abolish his scientific success, but they can represent him as a crazy scientist because he was a communist.

70dff8c0d19e8212a1c07ce78e69488e.jpg


The CIA, political toadies who like privileges and money, decide what will be the “PR image” of Kennedy, Eisenhower and Einstein.



Sometimes they go even further, they kill the president. My opinion is that Kennedy was killed by the fired CIA chief Allen Dulles and by the people from MIC. Kennedy was against cold war and wanted to negotiate with the Soviet Union, Kennedy fired Dulles, Kennedy was against the action “The Bay of Pigs” that was created to kill Fidel Castro. It was all public, there is no secret that Kennedy was like that, he had conflicts with Dulles, etc. Kennedy let them to make action against Fidel because it was already planned before Kennedy came to the power. Kennedy accused Allen for lying and manipulating him in the Bay of Pigs fiasco and fired him, logically, Allen misused his power, unofficial connections, to make the revenge. There were and official government reports citing the CIA as uncooperative in investigations about murder, such things fueled opinion that the CIA killed Kennedy. And Dulles continued the same with the family of Kennedy, crowd of them died in many accidents many years later. Secret service always use accidents to kill somebody. Even today, nobody was arrested for all these “accidents”. It means, there are people more powerful than the president, they are the CIA and MIC owned by banks and billionaires.

Conclusion: The CIA mixed themselves with the military defense contractors i.e. with the banks and billionaires. They make profit from the war and if anyone stop American war policy, they will kill him. They got the power to be above the president, that's the result of: the state as a service of rich people. If the president touch interest of riches, he will be dead.


addition: There are constant wars even there where was the peace, for example, Iraq in the time of Saddam was without ISIS. The leader of ISIS was 2 years in American prison, now he and the CIA together make the war. They/ISIS even openly recruit Muslim in the EU for the war against Assad and they use the CIA tools: facebook, twitter, etc. If Al Kaeda used facebook, they would be arrested immediately, twitter and facebook can download javascript code to your computer, to collect and send information about PC, if you visit some accounts they marked as terrorists. The CIA people like Phebe could misuse standpoints of Osama Bin Laden to create the war on terrorism, to create profit for MIC, but Bin Laden was not their man than the enemy, they just misused him, the leader of ISIS is the CIA man. Therefore, American politicians were against mixing of Russians in the war in Syria, beside Americans, the war would continue million years, the same as in the case of Israel and Palestine. The CIA let ISIS to attack Paris, to mix France in the war, to buy weapons from the General Dynamics, Boeing, etc.

All these terrorist attacks just to benefit the MIC, Phebe, banks and billionaires.
This can be changed only with the revolution but they militarize police, they make special prisons for political activists who are against NATO and MIC, they destroyed occupy protests. but banksters are planning new schema similar to the crisis in 2008 and it will be a new chance for the people to stand up and destroy the present system. the time will come for a new occupy.
 
That's an awful lot of information combined into...I don't know, something similar to an X-File?

What would Mulder say?

 
Last edited:
Who is Al Kaeda?
 
Let's start from an example and then continue...

Phebe Novakovic was working for the CIA and now she is working for the General Dynamics, the world’s fifth-largest defense contractor.
Background: Her father was a Serb who escaped to the US when he was 17 and started to work as a spy for America, for a foreign country = traitor.
She was married with a Michael Vickers in 1985, a former Green Beret who became the chief strategist for the CIA secret program that armed the mujahadeen as they fought against the Soviet Union’s in Afghanistan. Until this past spring Vickers was undersecretary of defense for intelligence, he retired from government service in April, 2015. As of December 2015, it was announced that he had been appointed to the BAE Systems, INC. Board of Directors (Civil and military aerospace, naval vessels, munitions, land warfare systems). Later, she married David H. Morrison, who was then a top staffer on the House defense appropriations subcommittee, a powerful figure in defense contracting. Later, he was working for the Boeing.

Beside such husbands, in 1992 she joined the White House Office of Management and Budget and rose quickly to become a top official overseeing the defense and intelligence budgets. Five years later she crossed the Potomac to work as a special assistant to William Cohen, then Defense secretary, and his deputy John Hamre. “She had an enormous amount of authority in the contracting world,” says Nicholas Chabraja, who was then General Dynamics’ CEO and became a mentor to Novakovic. So, she was working for the CIA and she was controlling the budget for the defense and then the private military industry employed her to work for them. Phebe got the position of a CEO in General Dynamics, they use her to get contracts. They produce warplanes, marine, missile, combat systems, etc. The last year she got from them $20M bucks, but they had the profit $3 or 3.5 billion from the war, from conflicts produced by the CIA, they sell tanks and other military systems, they are one of those private military/defense contractor like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, United technologies, etc. They are the one behind the war, not only oil/energy billionaires.

Private defense contractors are in Pentagon from 60-ties, already 50 years. They profited from the cold war and after that they supported Gulf War and Iraq war and all other wars. If there is the truth about 9/11 conspiracy, that it was organized by the CIA, to make a new war, then we can see who organized 9/11 (together with Saudi intelligence). People like Phebe have connections in the CIA, they produce conflicts and Phebe use the CIA to get contracts for the General Dynamics. All of them share money from the General Dynamics profit, and this company is not the only one, other companies function in the same way. Her husband was also working for the Boeing before he retired. She and her husband secure conflicts and contracts i.e. profit for the private military contractors. Boeing net profit in 2015: $5.17 billion. Boeing is the world’s second-largest defense contractor and General Dynamics is the world’s fifth-largest defense contractor.

Then I wanted to check who are the owners of these companies that profit from the war. For whom (beside for themselves) Phebe and the CIA produce profit? I supposed the owner are hidden behind many companies and they can have mixed investments, but surely they are billionaires and people like British Queen, they invest money in different companies and banks and companies and banks again invest money in the private military contractors.

Individual shareholders in Boeing are the top people in the company like the chairman James McNerney (in 5 years he got from Boeing $64M bucks, he owns 437,690 shares), Dennis Muilenburg, etc.
Institutional shareholders own 76% of the company and they are: Capital World Investors with 43,810,162 shares, Evercore Trust Company, N.A. with 43,049,097 shares, Vanguard Group, Inc. with 38,799,156 shares, Blackrock, Wells Fargo, UBS, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, etc.

I don't know how to remove attached image, I had to separate post into 3 parts, it was too long.

So is this all leading up to exposing The Iluminati or something?
 
The propeller on your beanie cap is really on high RPM's this morning.....eh?

Just an observation. I don't think English is the first language of the poster, but the effort is laudable. Now let's talk about CIA history. The CIA began under Donovan immediately after WWII and was the OSS. It morphed to CIA and was specifically for foreign intelligence gathering, spying, and assisting USA CORPORATIONS overseas. It was not allowed to operate domestically. The only USA Corporations overseas were the large multinational Corporations like IBM, ATT, ITT, Banks, Import/Export, Energy, Weapons, etc. ergo the CIA became joined at the hip with these groups. Check United Fruit to understand banana republics and who adjusted governments to help their business. Check ITT and copper and Chile and Allende and Pinochet to see how we helped ITT. Check Zelaya in Honduras. Check Aristide in Haiti. Check Nicaragua, Oliver North(CIA), cocaine, Panama banks, Mena Arkansas, AFDC, Mena, Arkansas, Clintons, Bush, weapons, Cabazon reservation, and remember North's testimony that he was authorized to set up a self-funding group to supply weapons to the Contras in Nicaragua and give them flight training. John Negroponte and death squads in Latin America and Iraq. CIA operatives are established in the State Department to get immunity with diplomatic passports. CIA operatives are planted in the Defense Dept to further military agendas. The CIA now has its' own army. The CIA has perhaps a hundred thousand PMCs, but they are corporate so it is difficult to put a precise number on them. The CIA had 400 operatives in USA newsrooms in 1977 and budgets have increased astronomically. Why would the CIA want to control newsrooms? Energy Corporations operated in Saudi Arabia ergo the CIA helped them and infiltrated Energy at all levels. Corporations will accept CIA plants to help and curry favor.

I liked the beanie cap quote for creativity but there is more fact in the OPs post than CT. CT is the standard response to all investigations that come too close to the truth.
 
Just an observation. I don't think English is the first language of the poster, but the effort is laudable. Now let's talk about CIA history. The CIA began under Donovan immediately after WWII and was the OSS. It morphed to CIA and was specifically for foreign intelligence gathering, spying, and assisting USA CORPORATIONS overseas. It was not allowed to operate domestically. The only USA Corporations overseas were the large multinational Corporations like IBM, ATT, ITT, Banks, Import/Export, Energy, Weapons, etc. ergo the CIA became joined at the hip with these groups. Check United Fruit to understand banana republics and who adjusted governments to help their business. Check ITT and copper and Chile and Allende and Pinochet to see how we helped ITT. Check Zelaya in Honduras. Check Aristide in Haiti. Check Nicaragua, Oliver North(CIA), cocaine, Panama banks, Mena Arkansas, AFDC, Mena, Arkansas, Clintons, Bush, weapons, Cabazon reservation, and remember North's testimony that he was authorized to set up a self-funding group to supply weapons to the Contras in Nicaragua and give them flight training. John Negroponte and death squads in Latin America and Iraq. CIA operatives are established in the State Department to get immunity with diplomatic passports. CIA operatives are planted in the Defense Dept to further military agendas. The CIA now has its' own army. The CIA has perhaps a hundred thousand PMCs, but they are corporate so it is difficult to put a precise number on them. The CIA had 400 operatives in USA newsrooms in 1977 and budgets have increased astronomically. Why would the CIA want to control newsrooms? Energy Corporations operated in Saudi Arabia ergo the CIA helped them and infiltrated Energy at all levels. Corporations will accept CIA plants to help and curry favor.

I liked the beanie cap quote for creativity but there is more fact in the OPs post than CT. CT is the standard response to all investigations that come too close to the truth.
The CIA controls all newsrooms? Proof please.
 
Makes one wonder what newsrooms did before the CIA :confused:

Personally, I suggest we all step back and watch how what is almost certain to be a drive-by truthing implodes on itself. So far nothing worth discussing.
 
The CIA does and always has done a great job in newsrooms. Who has ever heard of Watergate?
 
The CIA controls all newsrooms? Proof please.

1977 Church Committee. Iraq War, Judith Miller, mobile chemical weapons labs. Yellowcake.
 
The CIA controls all newsrooms? Proof please.

Answer your own question. Why would the CIA have 400 operatives in newsrooms?
They're not there to clean the toilets. Gee, what is it that the CIA does?
 
Personally, I suggest we all step back and watch how what is almost certain to be a drive-by truthing implodes on itself. So far nothing worth discussing.
Agreed. Anyone who leads of with this statement:
Let's start from an example and then continue....
THEN follows with THREE "Wall of Text" rants...

AND cannot say up front that he is presenting an "example" of...

....certainly doesn't display the reasoning processes to join in rational discussion. If he cannot say what he is wanting to talk about......

We've seen a few "wall of text" specialists but they area small proportion of the total number of trolls even in these troll rich days.
 
Answer your own question. Why would the CIA have 400 operatives in newsrooms?
They're not there to clean the toilets. Gee, what is it that the CIA does?

They're doing a terrible job.
 
Answer your own question. Why would the CIA have 400 operatives in newsrooms?
They're not there to clean the toilets. Gee, what is it that the CIA does?

Prove that the CIA have 400 operatives in newsrooms. How many newsrooms are there?
 
A good demonstration of how the Military Industrial Complex works, and welcome to the forum New Guy, but most folks would prefer to believe that Ike was hallucinating when he delivered his Farewell Address, just like they like to think that somewhere under those desert sands, Saddam really did have some WMD hidden away. :mrgreen:
 
A good demonstration of how the Military Industrial Complex works, and welcome to the forum New Guy, but most folks would prefer to believe that Ike was hallucinating when he delivered his Farewell Address, just like they like to think that somewhere under those desert sands, Saddam really did have some WMD hidden away. :mrgreen:

How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons
 
Agreed. Anyone who leads of with this statement:

THEN follows with THREE "Wall of Text" rants...

AND cannot say up front that he is presenting an "example" of...

....certainly doesn't display the reasoning processes to join in rational discussion. If he cannot say what he is wanting to talk about......

Naturally Henry thought it was great. :roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom