“It’s embarrassing, yes. We’re going to get to the bottom of it,” Waltz said, adding that he was consulting with Elon Musk: “We’ve got the best technical minds looking at how this happened.”
"Of course I didn’t see this loser in the group. It looked like someone else. Whether he did it deliberately or it happened in some other technical mean is something we’re trying to figure out.”
Although Waltz claimed a staffer was not responsible, Trump appeared to make contradictory remarks in a Newsmax interview, saying: “We believe … somebody that was on the line, with permission, somebody that … worked with Mike Waltz at a lower level, had Goldberg’s number or call through the app, and somehow this guy ended up on the call.” It’s unclear what exactly the president was suggesting, since Goldberg was added to a text chat, not a phone call.
Coldbert can **** off and nobody would care.Colbert lets loose...
You are ignoring something very important that Waltz said...that the contact in the Signal app had one person's name and, instead of their number, it had that reporter's number. Yes, Waltz is doing the right thing and taking full responsibility for this happening, but he knows HE didn't do that and you can be damned sure he's going to find out who did.These guys look worse and worse.
Waltz struggles to explain what happened but he has Elmo looking into it...
Later in the interview he suggests Goldberg might have hacked into the text group....
The most clueless person might still be Donald Trump who at first knew nothing about this, even after the Atlantic story was being widely reported, and now thinks it was a phone call...
Mike Waltz claims ‘full responsibility’ for Signal chat group leaked to journalist
Trump adviser says he can’t explain how Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg’s number was included in the group chatwww.theguardian.com
I'm not that gullible but you do you.You are ignoring something very important that Waltz said...that the contact in the Signal app had one person's name and, instead of their number, it had that reporter's number
So can someone else, we all know!Coldbert can **** off and nobody would care.
Or….don't use Signal to discuss bombing a country.You are ignoring something very important that Waltz said...that the contact in the Signal app had one person's name and, instead of their number, it had that reporter's number. Yes, Waltz is doing the right thing and taking full responsibility for this happening, but he knows HE didn't do that and you can be damned sure he's going to find out who did.
I would hate to be that person.
Thanks for the morning chuckle….You are ignoring something very important that Waltz said...that the contact in the Signal app had one person's name and, instead of their number, it had that reporter's number. Yes, Waltz is doing the right thing and taking full responsibility for this happening, but he knows HE didn't do that and you can be damned sure he's going to find out who did.
I would hate to be that person.
The Signal app isn't the problem. It is certified by all the government security agencies as being secure.Or….don't use Signal to discuss bombing a country.
Crazy concept. Mind blowing, I’m sure.
You post such hilariously inaccurate shit...The Signal app isn't the problem. It is certified by all the government security agencies as being secure
Just going to make stuff up now are you?The problem is that someone manipulated the app and inserted false contact information into it.
Mike Waltz has "taken" full responsibility for this breech and as such he is who first and foremost needs to be in that proverbial "world of hurt".The Signal app isn't the problem. It is certified by all the government security agencies as being secure.
The problem is that someone manipulated the app and inserted false contact information into it.
I would hate to be that person. They are about to be in a world of hurt.
Nope.Just going to make stuff up now are you?
I believe he has.Mike Waltz claims ‘full responsibility’ for Signal chat group leaked to journalist.
Has Mike Waltz been charged with any and all appropriate charges for having allowed this leak?
If not, why not?
What charges has he been charged with, then? Do you know?I believe he has.
No, no it isn't. The use of signal is the entire problem, not that they embarrassed themselves with an unintentional invite. Commercial apps (ALL OF THEM) are much easier to compromise than government SCIFs and high security communication systems. If our enemies hadn't already hacked signal before this incident, they damn well have now. Then there is the REASON they are using signal. It automatically deletes messages after a short time. We have government record keeping laws which they are intentionally circumventing. It's illegal and corrupt as hell.The Signal app isn't the problem. It is certified by all the government security agencies as being secure.
The problem is that someone manipulated the app and inserted false contact information into it.
I would hate to be that person. They are about to be in a world of hurt.
Likewise the clueless and incompetent moron, Gabbard, Trump picked as DNIColdbert can **** off and nobody would care.
You didn't read the entire article, did you?You post such hilariously inaccurate shit...
NSA warned of vulnerabilities in Signal app a month before Houthi strike chat
NSA warned of vulnerabilities in Signal app a month before Houthi strike chat
The National Security Agency sent a bulletin in February warning of Russian hackers trying to access encrypted conversations on Signal.www.cbsnews.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?